The New York Times doesn't realize that we only have ONE president and endorses 2 women lol

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Even their headline is FAKE NEWS lol

Those two nitwits are not leading in the polls so what "democrats" have chosen them? The elites?
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

The New York Times? Oh yes, hold on, I forgot :eusa_doh:

upload_2020-1-20_22-44-51.png
 
NYT has forgotten that Hillary is (allegedly) female? After all, she IS destined to be the 2020 Democrat Party nominee no matter how many suicides it might require.

Hillary to be the Democrat candidate in 2020, 2024, 2028 and 2032....:smoke:

mg1ZbL7.jpg
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Why is this confusing for you?

In a break with convention, the
editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate
Democratic candidates for president.

Exactly. And, they decided to break with convention because the candidate hasn't been chosen by the party yet, so they are giving everyone options as to who they think are the 2 best. Incidentally, both women have different views on where they want to take the party, which is one reason they chose 2. Saw an interview with a NYT reporter today, and they said that was the reason they chose 2.
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Why is this confusing for you?

In a break with convention, the
editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate
Democratic candidates for president.

Exactly. And, they decided to break with convention because the candidate hasn't been chosen by the party yet, so they are giving everyone options as to who they think are the 2 best. Incidentally, both women have different views on where they want to take the party, which is one reason they chose 2. Saw an interview with a NYT reporter today, and they said that was the reason they chose 2.

The things these snowflakes choose to freak out over is just odd.
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Other Left-Wing publications mock Far-Left New York Times bizarro Vagina-Based-Penis-Free Double Endorsement, when for example the Left-Wing Guardian of England and the Left-Wing Politico mock this you know it's going to produce hilarity all round for some time:

Nolte: New York Times Mercilessly Mocked for Warren-Klobuchar Endorsement | Breitbart

Even that Leftist Nate Silver sees this as incredibly stupid:

upload_2020-1-20_23-48-33.png


And some Elizabeth Warren supporters who are not fully on the Slow Train realise how STUPID it is of The New York Times endorsing BOTH women when ONLY ONE of them can get the nomination:

upload_2020-1-20_23-47-16.png
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Why is this confusing for you?

In a break with convention, the
editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate
Democratic candidates for president.

You obviously are not intellectually capable of comprehending or you would already know, you must be one of those Leftists that has an IQ of 220 or whatever :rolleyes-41: WTF even some Leftists are Tweeting and Blogging how completely stupid this double endorsement is.
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Why is this confusing for you?

In a break with convention, the
editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate
Democratic candidates for president.

You obviously are not intellectually capable of comprehending or you would already know, you must be one of those Leftists that has an IQ of 220 or whatever :rolleyes-41: WTF even some Leftists are Tweeting and Blogging how completely stupid this double endorsement is.

And you agree with them...guess that makes you the leftist.
 
It is just their first draft - who knows how many 'endorsements' for President will follow.

Have The New York Times ranted yet about how racist the Democrats are because ALL remaining candidates are White now that they eliminated ALL the candidates that were Brown and Black?
 
Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President

Hedging their bets?
Playing identity politics?
Virtue signaling?
Just plain stupid?

Why is this confusing for you?

In a break with convention, the
editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate
Democratic candidates for president.

You obviously are not intellectually capable of comprehending or you would already know, you must be one of those Leftists that has an IQ of 220 or whatever :rolleyes-41: WTF even some Leftists are Tweeting and Blogging how completely stupid this double endorsement is.

And you agree with them...guess that makes you the leftist.

Whatever :rolleyes-41: Of course you INSIST you are the most Conservative member of this forum, except that we have NEVER seen you post ANYTHING remotely Conservative or EVEN conservative....as I say....whatevah :smoke:
 

Forum List

Back
Top