The National Review

[lastword]

By all means we deserve to see how this plays out. Even the National Review supports that.

They say:

In other words, without any sort of supporting evidence, we should not put much stock in the sensational and belated claim of Trump himself participating in the rape of a young teenager. But it’s not so easy to dismiss the same charge as it applies to Jeffrey Epstein – or the significant possibility that Trump, like Clinton, may have been closer to Epstein’s now-infamous sexual abuses than he lets on.

 

[hjmick]

Link.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

By all means we deserve to see how this plays out. Even the National Review supports that.

They say:

In other words, without any sort of supporting evidence, we should not put much stock in the sensational and belated claim of Trump himself participating in the rape of a young teenager. But it’s not so easy to dismiss the same charge as it applies to Jeffrey Epstein – or the significant possibility that Trump, like Clinton, may have been closer to Epstein’s now-infamous sexual abuses than he lets on.

You know the National Review has ALWAYS been a Never Trumper organization dont you?

“Never Trump” Finished & Russia Election Hacking Criticism | National Review

 

[Auld Phart]

By all means we deserve to see how this plays out. Even the National Review supports that.

They say:

In other words, without any sort of supporting evidence, we should not put much stock in the sensational and belated claim of Trump himself participating in the rape of a young teenager. But it’s not so easy to dismiss the same charge as it applies to Jeffrey Epstein – or the significant possibility that Trump, like Clinton, may have been closer to Epstein’s now-infamous sexual abuses than he lets on.

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.