The Most Malignant Sonnet Ever Written

[Flanders]

Simply voting for candidates who swear they will protect and defend this country has never been enough. Had their oath of office been enough Americans would not now be a half-a-tick away from losing their country forever. I am happy to report that there is ray of hope. Bob Unruh’s most informative article is a MUST READ for everyone concerned about illegal immigration and United Nations refugees pouring into this country through open-borders:

A report analyzing America’s legislative gridlock on immigration under the Obama administration shows that the states originally controlled foreign nationals’ access to their territory, a policy that worked well for the nation in its first century.

It was when Washington stuck its fingers into the pie that the circumstances leading to today’s gridlock developed.​

Stunner! Constitution lets states tackle immigration
Posted By Bob Unruh On 09/06/2016 @ 9:56 pm

Stunner! Constitution lets states tackle immigration​

I cannot improve improve upon Unruh’s details; so I will close with my oft-stated contempt for Emma Lazarus’ malignant sonnet. This single piece of filth contributed more to America’s lost sovereignty than did American presidents, the Congress, and the Supreme Court because it has taken on the legitimacy of law:

https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Mc8131925c29532c60c36d226cf60c7e1o0&pid=Api&w=234&h=181

NOTE: The New Colossus corresponds with the beginning of Socialism in America and the start of America’s decline:

Author John T. Cunningham wrote that "The Statue of Liberty was not conceived and sculpted as a symbol of immigration, but it quickly became so as immigrant ships passed under the statue. However, it was Lazarus's poem that permanently stamped on Miss Liberty the role of unofficial greeter of incoming immigrants".

Myth No. 1: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore..." Well, not quite. Emma Lazarus's 1883 poem "The New Colossus" -- written in the year the Statue of Liberty was dedicated -- has been taken by many to reflect a true picture of immigration. This is not the case. From the colonial period on, there were standards that immigrants had to meet. Originally addressed at the regional level, then by the states, they were eventually federalized. The immigration stations, such as the one at Ellis Island in New York harbor, were not welcoming centers. They were processing points for the inspection and certification of new arrivals. Individuals with physical or mental problems, or who were known to be criminals in their country of origin, were denied entry. Older or underage family members required sponsorship. All of this was to ensure that the newly arrived immigrants would not be a burden to their new country and could either support themselves or be supported by others.​

XXXXX​

Myth No. 2: People come here because they want to become Americans.

XXXXX​

Myth No. 3: Everyone is really seeking the same things.​

November 28, 2010
The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration
By Frank Burke

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_dangerous_mythology_of_imm.html​

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The only thing dangerous is this sort of ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

 

[Flanders]

UPDATE​

I guarantee that Edel Rodriguez does not known a damn thing about the meaning of the Statue of Liberty, but he did hit upon a good idea. Chop off democracy’s head:

http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxne...0.img.jpg/876/493/1486221219462.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

The artist behind the illustration is Cuban-born Edel Rodriguez who came to the U.S. as a political refugee in 1980, The Washington Post reported.

“It's a beheading of democracy, a beheading of a sacred symbol,” Rodriguez told the paper in defending the illustration. “And clearly, lately, what's associated with beheadings is ISIS, so there's a comparison” between the ISIS extremist group and Trump.​

German magazine sparks furor with cover of Trump beheading Statue of Liberty
Published February 04, 2017

German magazine sparks furor with cover of Trump beheading Statue of Liberty​

https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.pKXso-9r3zrpAyLv-KUH8gEsDe&pid=Api&w=243&h=181

This terrible sonnet is nowhere to be seen on The Statue of Liberty in Paris:

This single piece of filth contributed more to America’s lost sovereignty than did American presidents, the Congress, and the Supreme Court because it has taken on the legitimacy of law:

Incidentally, Socialism’s ideology denies liberty. Every time liberalism’s garbage is threatened Socialist America-haters come out in full force citing the Statue of Liberty as though they are the Lady’s greatest defenders.

This piece of Euro trash had me in tears because she came here, and then devoted the freedoms she got for free by promoting Emma Lazuras’ filth:

VIDEO ▼

Madeleine Albright: There Are Tears in the Eyes of the Statue of Liberty - Breitbart

Finally, the latest crapola phrase was coined by the filthiest piece of garbage of them all taking about harsh treatment for people trying to kill us:

​

Now the sewer rat’s phrase is trotted out by his clones every time one of liberalism’s scared cows is challenged.

 

[Flanders]

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.3UB8g_L9wpbLcW07arG97gEsDh&pid=Api&w=155&h=100&c=7

This is an additional reason to remove that disgusting plaque:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5NXHFlXUAArE2S.jpg

Banner reading 'Refugees welcome' appears at base of Statue of Liberty
By JULIA JACOBO
Feb 21, 2017, 5:55 PM ET

Banner reading 'Refugees welcome' appears at base of Statue of Liberty​

 

[xband]

Simply voting for candidates who swear they will protect and defend this country has never been enough. Had their oath of office been enough Americans would not now be a half-a-tick away from losing their country forever. I am happy to report that there is ray of hope. Bob Unruh’s most informative article is a MUST READ for everyone concerned about illegal immigration and United Nations refugees pouring into this country through open-borders:

A report analyzing America’s legislative gridlock on immigration under the Obama administration shows that the states originally controlled foreign nationals’ access to their territory, a policy that worked well for the nation in its first century.

It was when Washington stuck its fingers into the pie that the circumstances leading to today’s gridlock developed.​

Stunner! Constitution lets states tackle immigration
Posted By Bob Unruh On 09/06/2016 @ 9:56 pm

Stunner! Constitution lets states tackle immigration​

I cannot improve improve upon Unruh’s details; so I will close with my oft-stated contempt for Emma Lazarus’ malignant sonnet. This single piece of filth contributed more to America’s lost sovereignty than did American presidents, the Congress, and the Supreme Court because it has taken on the legitimacy of law:

https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Mc8131925c29532c60c36d226cf60c7e1o0&pid=Api&w=234&h=181

NOTE: The New Colossus corresponds with the beginning of Socialism in America and the start of America’s decline:

Author John T. Cunningham wrote that "The Statue of Liberty was not conceived and sculpted as a symbol of immigration, but it quickly became so as immigrant ships passed under the statue. However, it was Lazarus's poem that permanently stamped on Miss Liberty the role of unofficial greeter of incoming immigrants".

Myth No. 1: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore..." Well, not quite. Emma Lazarus's 1883 poem "The New Colossus" -- written in the year the Statue of Liberty was dedicated -- has been taken by many to reflect a true picture of immigration. This is not the case. From the colonial period on, there were standards that immigrants had to meet. Originally addressed at the regional level, then by the states, they were eventually federalized. The immigration stations, such as the one at Ellis Island in New York harbor, were not welcoming centers. They were processing points for the inspection and certification of new arrivals. Individuals with physical or mental problems, or who were known to be criminals in their country of origin, were denied entry. Older or underage family members required sponsorship. All of this was to ensure that the newly arrived immigrants would not be a burden to their new country and could either support themselves or be supported by others.​

XXXXX​

Myth No. 2: People come here because they want to become Americans.

XXXXX​

Myth No. 3: Everyone is really seeking the same things.​

November 28, 2010
The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration
By Frank Burke

Articles: The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration​

Sonnet rings nine to me when I use hexidecimal.

 

[Flanders]

were not welcoming centers. They were processing points for the inspection and certification of new arrivals. Individuals with physical or mental problems, or who were known to be criminals in their country of origin, were denied entry.

This is sickening (no pun intended):

Psychiatrists and other doctors in Chicago and across the country have been caught helping immigrants gain U.S. citizenship by providing fake medical opinions, records show.​

02/24/2017, 06:36pm
Doctors gave fake medical opinions to help win citizenship
Frank Main

Doctors gave fake medical opinions to help win citizenship​

The sickening part is that psychiatrists are deciding immigration policy:

Psychiatrists who are so inclined use the power the government gave them to protect murderers from the death penalty. Where the hell does that authority originate? and who gave it to them? And where’s the proof that criminals cannot fool a psychiatrist. Bottom line: There is a huge difference between character witnesses and experts. I’m not even sure character witnesses should be allowed in capital cases until witnesses testifying to a defendant’s bad character are heard.

Every mass murderer who doesn’t pull his own plug ends up with an insanity defense. The irony is that psychiatry, an elitist control-tool at best, saves mass murderers from the death penalty. Those are the same people who would abolish the Second Amendment. Think about that for a while.

It is the ideology behind parasite-driven laws that needs to be questioned. The parasite class promotes legislation that provides tax dollar employment wherever possible. Parasites care about one thing only and it ain’t the mentally disturbed as evidenced by the array of drugs forced upon patients in today’s government-funded version of Bedlam monitored by the courts. It is tax dollar incomes buttressed by lifetime tenure at the public trough that draws the meanest of parasites to the mentally ill.

Psychiatric evaluations, psychological counseling, and all the rest of the liberal garbage placed thousands of new parasites into education bureaucracies. Their mandate is to brainwash the non-violent young who show signs of resisting socialism’s doctrine. Result: Personality-engineering has become a mainstay in America’s schools.

Remember Harvey?​

XXXXX​

To me, I see psychiatrists as overpaid bullshit artists who only cure serious mental disorders in movies and novels, while, psychologists resemble propagandists more than doctors. When all is said and done both rely on forcing their morality on their victims just as priests have done throughout history.​

And let us not forget this:

The Roman Catholic Church has been in the confession racket a lot longer than everybody else. Almost from America’s beginning priests were given the confessional-privilege (1813). Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists, followed suit with similar protections. I would take the privilege away from priests and psychiatrists before I would take it away from the others. If you are dumb enough to tell priests and psychiatrists anything you do not deserve protection.​

Collective Absolution​

 

[xband]

A Sonnet has nine stanzas. QED

 

[Flanders]

A Sonnet has nine stanzas. QED

sonnet (noun)​

1. A 14-line verse form usually having one of several conventional rhyme schemes.

2. A poem in this form.​

To xband: I count 14:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

 

[xband]

A Sonnet has nine stanzas. QED

sonnet (noun)​

1. A 14-line verse form usually having one of several conventional rhyme schemes.

2. A poem in this form.​

To xband: I count 14:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

I misspell dilemma on purpose and spell it delemma like in dele.

 

[emilynghiem]

The only thing dangerous is this sort of ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

What makes it twice as dangerous C_Clayton_Jones
is when both sides blame the other for doing it,
and fail to see they are equally espousing fear and hatred.
It's like a double-blind set up.

If even one side is aware the problem is mutual, there's a chance to steer clear and out of trouble.
But if both sides are blind to their biases, how can we expect to see any change to a vicious cycle?

 

[xband]

The only thing dangerous is this sort of ignorance, bigotry, and hate.

What makes it twice as dangerous C_Clayton_Jones
is when both sides blame the other for doing it,
and fail to see they are equally espousing fear and hatred.
It's like a double-blind set up.

If even one side is aware the problem is mutual, there's a chance to steer clear and out of trouble.
But if both sides are blind to their biases, how can we expect to see any change to a vicious cycle?

If they don't agree with us, Willie Peter their ass.