KittenKoder
Senior Member
What can I say ?---science is proven wrong by itself almost daily. Yank the heart out of that robot carrying your brain and let me know how well your brain works afterwords.
Computers need a fuel source just as much as our brains, they are just simpler machines and thus their requirements are fewer (only one fuel source). Our blood is what carries the fuel sources, moved by our hearts, through our veins. The mechanical computer uses electricity only (our bodies produce it's own using other fuels) transported from a power source (battery or power plant) to the parts with wires. The analogy is not flawed, just simplistic. Biology goes into far more detail and explains all the different processes but the concepts of robotics and computers actually mimic living beings. As a matter of fact they have been experimenting with producing simple duplicates of brains using our mechanical technology for decades, and many robotics hobbyists use an insect level computer brain in their robots (very simplistic and only capable of minimal learning). If the power source of a computer is cut, all the RAM vanishes, effectively "killing" it, the only salvation is that with mechanical brains we can save the data, on hard drives, so when the power source is restored it can reload that data, thus allowing it to be revived infinitely. The analogy actually continues much more than this, down to how muscles and hydrolics function the same. The cells in our bodies work specific jobs, just like tiny little machines, and like machines our bodies wear out eventually. So again, how are we that different beyond having a spirit or soul?
Since robotics and computers were INVENETED by the human mind how could they do anything but reflect the workings of a human mind ? Yes-yourand does nothing to prove that body chemistry doesn't affect ones thinking or resulting behavior.analogy is flawed and simplistic.
You think that the robot analogy for the human body says that? No, it does not. The analogy does more to show that every system within the body is connected, not separate and that by altering the body chemistry you can alter brain development, though with our understanding of the brain this is not a good thing for anyone before a specific age (which varies slightly with each person and cannot be predicted accurately yet). The brain is not static until such an age and altering the physiology of someone before it does become static can only risk more harm than good.