The majority of Americans distrust the MSM because the MSM ignores the 5Ws of journalism!

[healthmyths]

If you ever sat through Journalism 101, [as I Healthmyths had in college!] you know all about the Five Ws and one H. For the rest of you, you may find this concept helpful when preparing interview questions or writing factual news stories. This concept may help you write better news releases too, considering they should contain news.
Five Ws and One H: The Secret to Complete News Stories

• Who was involved?
• What happened?
• Where did it take place?
• When did it take place?
• Why did that happen?

Today's MSM has forgotten these principles as evidence by some examples of the White House gaggle when asking President Trump...idiotic, totally NON-journalistic questions like this:

“Can you promise that the president will tell the truth tonight? Will he tell the truth?” Acosta asked as Conway spoke with reporters about the speech outside the White House.
https://nypost.com/2019/01/08/kellyanne-conway-calls-jim-acosta-smart-ass-in-heated-exchange/

What kind of NON-Journalistic, antagonistic question!
Where in that question was there any question asking the 5 Ws?
NO WHERE!

Acosta was simply being an antagonist! Not a journalist. As a result is it any wonder millions of Americans like me are reading/watching/listening to the MSM with a totally jaundiced demeanor.
The MSM has totally ignored the principles of journalism and are presenting biased news that more and more of us are ignoring. Why is the Dallas Morning News, NYTimes, among others having financial problems and IT is NOT only because of the Internet or social media! Newspaper Death Watch

In part it is because of what the following study shows.
Study: Here's Just How Insanely Biased News Reporting On Trump Was In 2018
NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.

Since he was inaugurated on January 20, 2017, MRC has been tracking "every moment of coverage of President Trump on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts," which a total of some 23 million viewers watch on average every night. And what they've found since they first started watching is amazingly consistent: the media's spin on all Trump-related stories has been "incessantly hostile: 90% negative, vs. just 10% positive (excluding neutral statements)."

Study: Here's Just How Insanely Biased News Reporting On Trump Was In 2018

NOW I truly don't expect you raging, emotionally driven anti-Trump people to respond because anything you say is truly non-factual!

But this is meant for those millions of honest people that still believe the MSM is unbiased and these people shake their heads in confusion when they hear the negative news about the President.

Folks... Trump IS a braggart! Is Obnoxious! Is loud. Boisterous! NO question!
But he has gotten things done in two years that have not been done in 50 years!
IN spite of the 90% incessant negative press!
FACTS!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The MSM is employed by the Democratic Party to push their ideals and agenda. They care nothing for hard news.

 

[g5000]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

No, they're not. Shepard Smith is a prime example.

 

[anynameyouwish]

If you ever sat through Journalism 101, [as I Healthmyths had in college!] you know all about the Five Ws and one H. For the rest of you, you may find this concept helpful when preparing interview questions or writing factual news stories. This concept may help you write better news releases too, considering they should contain news.
Five Ws and One H: The Secret to Complete News Stories

• Who was involved?
• What happened?
• Where did it take place?
• When did it take place?
• Why did that happen?

Today's MSM has forgotten these principles as evidence by some examples of the White House gaggle when asking President Trump...idiotic, totally NON-journalistic questions like this:

“Can you promise that the president will tell the truth tonight? Will he tell the truth?” Acosta asked as Conway spoke with reporters about the speech outside the White House.
https://nypost.com/2019/01/08/kellyanne-conway-calls-jim-acosta-smart-ass-in-heated-exchange/

What kind of NON-Journalistic, antagonistic question!
Where in that question was there any question asking the 5 Ws?
NO WHERE!

Acosta was simply being an antagonist! Not a journalist. As a result is it any wonder millions of Americans like me are reading/watching/listening to the MSM with a totally jaundiced demeanor.
The MSM has totally ignored the principles of journalism and are presenting biased news that more and more of us are ignoring. Why is the Dallas Morning News, NYTimes, among others having financial problems and IT is NOT only because of the Internet or social media! Newspaper Death Watch

In part it is because of what the following study shows.
Study: Here's Just How Insanely Biased News Reporting On Trump Was In 2018
NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.

Since he was inaugurated on January 20, 2017, MRC has been tracking "every moment of coverage of President Trump on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts," which a total of some 23 million viewers watch on average every night. And what they've found since they first started watching is amazingly consistent: the media's spin on all Trump-related stories has been "incessantly hostile: 90% negative, vs. just 10% positive (excluding neutral statements)."

Study: Here's Just How Insanely Biased News Reporting On Trump Was In 2018

NOW I truly don't expect you raging, emotionally driven anti-Trump people to respond because anything you say is truly non-factual!

But this is meant for those millions of honest people that still believe the MSM is unbiased and these people shake their heads in confusion when they hear the negative news about the President.

Folks... Trump IS a braggart! Is Obnoxious! Is loud. Boisterous! NO question!
But he has gotten things done in two years that have not been done in 50 years!
IN spite of the 90% incessant negative press!
FACTS!
View attachment 240456

The same 5 things that the alternative truth media ignore.

 

[g5000]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

No, they're not.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

 

[healthmyths]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Actually the FACT is not guesses as you are wont to do, that well here read the quote!

NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.
The most "fair and balanced" was in fact Fox News, which was "52% negative vs. 48% positive," the outlet notes.

Harvard STUDY so make fun of it!

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

 

[g5000]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Actually the FACT is not guesses as you are wont to do, that well here read the quote!

NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.
The most "fair and balanced" was in fact Fox News, which was "52% negative vs. 48% positive," the outlet notes.

Harvard STUDY so make fun of it!

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

Fool Me A Thousand Times



...Fox News said there was a "stand down order", and there was no stand down order…

Since The Blaze said a Mexican was stuffing an Arizona ballot box, and that Mexican was NOT stuffing an Arizona ballot box…

Since Breitbart said Chuck Hagel met with Friends of Hamas, and there is no such thing as the Friends of Hamas.

Since Bill O'Reilly said he was in combat, when he was a thousand miles from combat...

Since Fox News said the Marines guarding our embassy in Egypt were denied live ammo, and our Marines were NOT denied live ammo…

Since the right wing media hacks said 93 million people will lose their employer health insurance by the end of 2014, and 93 million people have NOT lost their health insurance…

Since Laura Ingraham said Obama was going to be impeached within three weeks, and Obama was NOT impeached…

Since Fox News said you can print ballots at home in Colorado, and you CANNOT print ballots at home in Colorado…

Since the credulous were told Michelle Obama and Elizabeth Warren had deleted Hillary from their Twitter accounts, and they did NOT delete Hillary from their Twitter accounts…

Since the credulous were told Obama was born in Kenya, and Obama was NOT born in Kenya…

Since the rubes were told Obama demanded to be sworn in on the Koran, and Obama did NOT demand to be sworn in on the Koran…

Since the credulous were told Obama banned Christmas cards on Military Bases, and Obama did NOT ban Christmas cards on military bases…

Since Fox News reported Obama banned Nativity scenes by Executive Order, and Obama did NOT ban Nativity scenes…

Since the credulous were told Obama cut God out of his Thanksgiving addresses every year, and believed it without even…you know…LOOKING to see if that was true, and Obama did NOT leave God out of any of his Thanksgiving or Christmas messages…

Since Fox News reported Obama used his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during a government shutdown, and Obama did NOT use his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during the shutdown…

Since World News Daily reported Obama wears a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”, and Obama does NOT wear a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”…

Since Fox News reported “far more children died last year drowning in their bath tubs than were accidentally killed by guns”, and far more children died from accidental gun deaths…

Since Fox News reported the Texas School Board of Education is considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution, and the Texas School Board of Education is NOT considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution…

Since the credulous bleeved Obama banned the Confederate flag by Executive Order…

Since the credulous bleeved Operation Jade Helm was a joint UN/US government takeover of the American southwest…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that said Obama has banned the Pledge of Allegiance…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Bill Clinton rape video…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Yoko Ono had an affair with Hillary Clinton…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a postal worker destroying Trump ballots…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Clinton’s campaign chairman wrote a racist screed that was actually written by a Netherlands nazi…

Since Donald Trump and millions of his Chumps fell for a hoax that John Podesta wrote something about Benghazi that a Newsweek reporter actually wrote…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax the Oregon mass shooter was on a Russian terror watch list which Obama refused to take…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that the Pope said there is no true religion and there is no hell…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Hillary body double on 9/11…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax video about Democratic primary voting fraud which was actually a video of Russian voting fraud which had been deliberately manipulated…

Since the credulous parroted a lie that Obama was trying to get us all killed by Ebola, and that Ebola was going to kill millions of American last year…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about Obama being snubbed for handshakes…

Since the credulous fell for the “death panels” hoax…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that 70 Congressional Democrats are members of the Communist party…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that DHS had bought 1.6 billion rounds of ammo…

At what point do you fools WAKE UP!?!?!

 

[g5000]

Geezus, how many times have I caught the pseudocons getting right back in line to drink their propagandists' piss after busting them?

Sorry, rubes. I'm not as stupid as you are. So I don't fall for your bullshit that the "MSM", whatever that means, are the only ones lying. Your own propagandists lie to you every single day. Including the Chief Executive Propagandist in the White House.

I've watched you chugging piss like it was Kool-Aid.

 

[healthmyths]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Actually the FACT is not guesses as you are wont to do, that well here read the quote!

NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.
The most "fair and balanced" was in fact Fox News, which was "52% negative vs. 48% positive," the outlet notes.

Harvard STUDY so make fun of it!

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

Fool Me A Thousand Times



...Fox News said there was a "stand down order", and there was no stand down order…

Since The Blaze said a Mexican was stuffing an Arizona ballot box, and that Mexican was NOT stuffing an Arizona ballot box…

Since Breitbart said Chuck Hagel met with Friends of Hamas, and there is no such thing as the Friends of Hamas.

Since Bill O'Reilly said he was in combat, when he was a thousand miles from combat...

Since Fox News said the Marines guarding our embassy in Egypt were denied live ammo, and our Marines were NOT denied live ammo…

Since the right wing media hacks said 93 million people will lose their employer health insurance by the end of 2014, and 93 million people have NOT lost their health insurance…

Since Laura Ingraham said Obama was going to be impeached within three weeks, and Obama was NOT impeached…

Since Fox News said you can print ballots at home in Colorado, and you CANNOT print ballots at home in Colorado…

Since the credulous were told Michelle Obama and Elizabeth Warren had deleted Hillary from their Twitter accounts, and they did NOT delete Hillary from their Twitter accounts…

Since the credulous were told Obama was born in Kenya, and Obama was NOT born in Kenya…

Since the rubes were told Obama demanded to be sworn in on the Koran, and Obama did NOT demand to be sworn in on the Koran…

Since the credulous were told Obama banned Christmas cards on Military Bases, and Obama did NOT ban Christmas cards on military bases…

Since Fox News reported Obama banned Nativity scenes by Executive Order, and Obama did NOT ban Nativity scenes…

Since the credulous were told Obama cut God out of his Thanksgiving addresses every year, and believed it without even…you know…LOOKING to see if that was true, and Obama did NOT leave God out of any of his Thanksgiving or Christmas messages…

Since Fox News reported Obama used his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during a government shutdown, and Obama did NOT use his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during the shutdown…

Since World News Daily reported Obama wears a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”, and Obama does NOT wear a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”…

Since Fox News reported “far more children died last year drowning in their bath tubs than were accidentally killed by guns”, and far more children died from accidental gun deaths…

Since Fox News reported the Texas School Board of Education is considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution, and the Texas School Board of Education is NOT considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution…

Since the credulous bleeved Obama banned the Confederate flag by Executive Order…

Since the credulous bleeved Operation Jade Helm was a joint UN/US government takeover of the American southwest…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that said Obama has banned the Pledge of Allegiance…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Bill Clinton rape video…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Yoko Ono had an affair with Hillary Clinton…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a postal worker destroying Trump ballots…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Clinton’s campaign chairman wrote a racist screed that was actually written by a Netherlands nazi…

Since Donald Trump and millions of his Chumps fell for a hoax that John Podesta wrote something about Benghazi that a Newsweek reporter actually wrote…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax the Oregon mass shooter was on a Russian terror watch list which Obama refused to take…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that the Pope said there is no true religion and there is no hell…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Hillary body double on 9/11…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax video about Democratic primary voting fraud which was actually a video of Russian voting fraud which had been deliberately manipulated…

Since the credulous parroted a lie that Obama was trying to get us all killed by Ebola, and that Ebola was going to kill millions of American last year…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about Obama being snubbed for handshakes…

Since the credulous fell for the “death panels” hoax…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that 70 Congressional Democrats are members of the Communist party…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that DHS had bought 1.6 billion rounds of ammo…

At what point do you fools WAKE UP!?!?!

Well wow... but you totally ignore this study...

 

[g5000]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Actually the FACT is not guesses as you are wont to do, that well here read the quote!

NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.
The most "fair and balanced" was in fact Fox News, which was "52% negative vs. 48% positive," the outlet notes.

Harvard STUDY so make fun of it!

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

Fool Me A Thousand Times



...Fox News said there was a "stand down order", and there was no stand down order…

Since The Blaze said a Mexican was stuffing an Arizona ballot box, and that Mexican was NOT stuffing an Arizona ballot box…

Since Breitbart said Chuck Hagel met with Friends of Hamas, and there is no such thing as the Friends of Hamas.

Since Bill O'Reilly said he was in combat, when he was a thousand miles from combat...

Since Fox News said the Marines guarding our embassy in Egypt were denied live ammo, and our Marines were NOT denied live ammo…

Since the right wing media hacks said 93 million people will lose their employer health insurance by the end of 2014, and 93 million people have NOT lost their health insurance…

Since Laura Ingraham said Obama was going to be impeached within three weeks, and Obama was NOT impeached…

Since Fox News said you can print ballots at home in Colorado, and you CANNOT print ballots at home in Colorado…

Since the credulous were told Michelle Obama and Elizabeth Warren had deleted Hillary from their Twitter accounts, and they did NOT delete Hillary from their Twitter accounts…

Since the credulous were told Obama was born in Kenya, and Obama was NOT born in Kenya…

Since the rubes were told Obama demanded to be sworn in on the Koran, and Obama did NOT demand to be sworn in on the Koran…

Since the credulous were told Obama banned Christmas cards on Military Bases, and Obama did NOT ban Christmas cards on military bases…

Since Fox News reported Obama banned Nativity scenes by Executive Order, and Obama did NOT ban Nativity scenes…

Since the credulous were told Obama cut God out of his Thanksgiving addresses every year, and believed it without even…you know…LOOKING to see if that was true, and Obama did NOT leave God out of any of his Thanksgiving or Christmas messages…

Since Fox News reported Obama used his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during a government shutdown, and Obama did NOT use his own money to keep a Muslim museum open during the shutdown…

Since World News Daily reported Obama wears a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”, and Obama does NOT wear a Muslim ring which says “There Is No God But Allah”…

Since Fox News reported “far more children died last year drowning in their bath tubs than were accidentally killed by guns”, and far more children died from accidental gun deaths…

Since Fox News reported the Texas School Board of Education is considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution, and the Texas School Board of Education is NOT considering banning references to Christmas and the Constitution…

Since the credulous bleeved Obama banned the Confederate flag by Executive Order…

Since the credulous bleeved Operation Jade Helm was a joint UN/US government takeover of the American southwest…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that said Obama has banned the Pledge of Allegiance…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Bill Clinton rape video…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Yoko Ono had an affair with Hillary Clinton…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a postal worker destroying Trump ballots…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that Clinton’s campaign chairman wrote a racist screed that was actually written by a Netherlands nazi…

Since Donald Trump and millions of his Chumps fell for a hoax that John Podesta wrote something about Benghazi that a Newsweek reporter actually wrote…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax the Oregon mass shooter was on a Russian terror watch list which Obama refused to take…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that the Pope said there is no true religion and there is no hell…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about a Hillary body double on 9/11…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax video about Democratic primary voting fraud which was actually a video of Russian voting fraud which had been deliberately manipulated…

Since the credulous parroted a lie that Obama was trying to get us all killed by Ebola, and that Ebola was going to kill millions of American last year…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax about Obama being snubbed for handshakes…

Since the credulous fell for the “death panels” hoax…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that 70 Congressional Democrats are members of the Communist party…

Since the credulous fell for a hoax that DHS had bought 1.6 billion rounds of ammo…

At what point do you fools WAKE UP!?!?!

Well wow... but you totally ignore this study...
View attachment 240491

Note the year, dipshit. Early 2017.

When Obama was in office, the "tone of negative coverage" by your piss outlets was through the roof.

Karma's a BITCH.

 

[otto105]

Of course, Fox News, Breitbart, The Washington Times, The National Enquirer, investors.com, and Sputnik are the exceptions to this balderdashery...




BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Actually the FACT is not guesses as you are wont to do, that well here read the quote!

NewsBusters notes that Harvard media scholar Thomas Patterson's analysis of NBC's and CBS's news coverage found similar results: the former's coverage was 93% negative, while the latter's was 91% negative. CNN and leading newspapers were also egregiously biased.
The most "fair and balanced" was in fact Fox News, which was "52% negative vs. 48% positive," the outlet notes.

Harvard STUDY so make fun of it!

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

Negative/positive coverage (of trump I assume) has nothing to do with facts and how there presented.

 

[g5000]

PREZ: I eat dead babies for breakfast.

REPORT: Prez says he eats dead babies for breakfast.

TARD: Look at the negative reporting! Give the guy a break!

 

[g5000]

If you tards are tired of the negative reporting about Trump, maybe he shouldn't lie so much, or grab pussies, or cheat on his wife, or suck off Putin in public.

 

[healthmyths]

If you tards are tired of the negative reporting about Trump, maybe he shouldn't lie so much, or grab pussies, or cheat on his wife, or suck off Putin in public.

You had NO problem with "pussy" when Obama claimed to have it!

Here is exactly what Trump said from the transcript:
Trump: "And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
“Whatever you want,” Bush responded.
Trump: "Grab’em by the pussy," Trump then said. "You can do anything.”
Trump's most infamous video will be played near the White House

DID Trump say HE ACTUALLY GRABBED them by the pussy or do you want to believe that?
Be honest.

You want it to be that he DID say that.

But did he admit that "I Donald Trump, grabbed them by the pussy"?

Now did Obama say "Gotta have them ribs, and pussy too" Yes he did! He said those exact words.
Do you believe that he actually did "gotta have them ribs and pussy too"?


You tell me the difference between the two statements. Trump did not admit to "grabbing pussy" any more then Obama said he had to have ribs and pussy!

 

[g5000]

If you tards are tired of the negative reporting about Trump, maybe he shouldn't lie so much, or grab pussies, or cheat on his wife, or suck off Putin in public.

You had NO problem with "pussy" when Obama claimed to have it!

Here is exactly what Trump said from the transcript:
Trump: "And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
“Whatever you want,” Bush responded.
Trump: "Grab’em by the pussy," Trump then said. "You can do anything.”
Trump's most infamous video will be played near the White House

DID Trump say HE ACTUALLY GRABBED them by the pussy or do you want to believe that?
Be honest.

You want it to be that he DID say that.

But did he admit that "I Donald Trump, grabbed them by the pussy"?

Now did Obama say "Gotta have them ribs, and pussy too" Yes he did! He said those exact words.
Do you believe that he actually did "gotta have them ribs and pussy too"?


You tell me the difference between the two statements. Trump did not admit to "grabbing pussy" any more then Obama said he had to have ribs and pussy!

Wow. I can't believe you are so retarded you can't tell the difference between GRABBING pussy WITHOUT CONSENT and getting laid.

 

[westwall]

If you tards are tired of the negative reporting about Trump, maybe he shouldn't lie so much, or grab pussies, or cheat on his wife, or suck off Putin in public.

You had NO problem with "pussy" when Obama claimed to have it!

Here is exactly what Trump said from the transcript:
Trump: "And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
“Whatever you want,” Bush responded.
Trump: "Grab’em by the pussy," Trump then said. "You can do anything.”
Trump's most infamous video will be played near the White House

DID Trump say HE ACTUALLY GRABBED them by the pussy or do you want to believe that?
Be honest.

You want it to be that he DID say that.

But did he admit that "I Donald Trump, grabbed them by the pussy"?

Now did Obama say "Gotta have them ribs, and pussy too" Yes he did! He said those exact words.
Do you believe that he actually did "gotta have them ribs and pussy too"?


You tell me the difference between the two statements. Trump did not admit to "grabbing pussy" any more then Obama said he had to have ribs and pussy!

Wow. I can't believe you are so retarded you can't tell the difference between GRABBING pussy WITHOUT CONSENT and getting laid.

No, what is amazing is the level of intellectual dishonesty you must sink to to further your false meme.

 

[healthmyths]

If you tards are tired of the negative reporting about Trump, maybe he shouldn't lie so much, or grab pussies, or cheat on his wife, or suck off Putin in public.

You had NO problem with "pussy" when Obama claimed to have it!

Here is exactly what Trump said from the transcript:
Trump: "And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
“Whatever you want,” Bush responded.
Trump: "Grab’em by the pussy," Trump then said. "You can do anything.”
Trump's most infamous video will be played near the White House

DID Trump say HE ACTUALLY GRABBED them by the pussy or do you want to believe that?
Be honest.

You want it to be that he DID say that.

But did he admit that "I Donald Trump, grabbed them by the pussy"?

Now did Obama say "Gotta have them ribs, and pussy too" Yes he did! He said those exact words.
Do you believe that he actually did "gotta have them ribs and pussy too"?


You tell me the difference between the two statements. Trump did not admit to "grabbing pussy" any more then Obama said he had to have ribs and pussy!

Wow. I can't believe you are so retarded you can't tell the difference between GRABBING pussy WITHOUT CONSENT and getting laid.

Did Trump say he actually grabbed a pussy? Grab’em by the pussy," Trump then said. "You can do anything.”
Where did Trump say "he grab'em" ?