The Low Fertility Of Urban Liberals Is A Feature Not A Bug

[Steinlight]

March 14, 2014 by CH

There is much hand-wringing by the hypocrati over the below-replacement fertility rates of overeducated, urban leftoid, credentialist suck-up, status whoring SWPLs. However will civilization carry on if our progressive snarkmeisters disappear down the sinkhole of Darwinian finality?

Well, I’m here to tell you that Western civilization will carry on quite well, and certainly better than it has the past 60 years. For evidence of the source of my sureness, review this quote by Thomas Aquinas on the Catholic Church’s prohibition of cousin marriage aka inbreeding:

"Afterwards, however, towards these latter times the prohibition [against cousin marriage] of the Church has been restricted to the fourth degree, because it became useless and dangerous to extend the prohibition to more remote degrees of consanguinity. Useless, because charity waxed cold in many hearts so that they had scarcely a greater bond of friendship with their more remote kindred than with strangers: and it was dangerous because through the prevalence of concupiscence and neglect men took no account of so numerous a kindred, and thus the prohibition of the more remote degrees became for many a snare leading to damnation."

Aquinas was a man who rightly perceived the dangers inherent in both too little and too much outbreeding. (Were we blessed with such wise men today!) Inbreeding encourages clan-based violence and decreases social trust, two consequences that are anathema to the development of modern civ. But too much outbreeding (EatPrayBang!) decreases charitable kin-feeling and incentivizes a decadent ennui that severs the citizen’s sense of obligation to his nation and co-ethnics.

Where is this thought leading? The native stock of the West is clearly suffering from a mental sickness caused by too much outbreeding. Universalism is the religion of liberal whites, and they cleave so strongly to this secular religion that they are happy, nay overjoyed!, to throw the borders open and bequeath their hard-won territory and culture to battalions of Third Worlders and other temperamentally distant aliens, who of course given large enough numbers will promptly, whether wittingly or consequentially, execute its destruction.

The liberal SWPLs’ universalist instinct is so deeply embedded that it’s become a danger to their own reproductive fitness. If it were just themselves they were (unproductively) screwing, that would be fine; unfortunately they’re screwing everyone who has to live under their administrative tyranny.

So it is with great sadistic glee that I put two and two together and conclude that the passing of the sweep of SWPL liberals into the prolapsed hole of history will prove, ultimately, a good thing for the reconstitution and continuation of Western civilization, and in particular of America. Whether through the act of some subconscious calculation, or environmental disincentive, or perhaps via a divinely directed cosmic rebalancing working magic on the impervious hindbrains of self-destructive fools, the children of universalist leftoids are fewer by the hour, and their complete demise closer by the day.

We should be welcoming this fitness adjustment for the ray of hope it delivers. Prosperity can turn on accidental fortune. Runaway universalism, it would appear, contains the seed of its doom, and in its death there will be rebirth. The gods of the copybook headings will have their laugh at last.

So pass out the condoms, fire up the abortion mills, parade the sluts, stream the cuck porn, shove those freebie Pills down the throats of SWPL princesses, and bask in your righteousness, knowing that your tribute in distasteful utilitarianism will pay handsome rewards to your posterity.

Truly, the SWPL is the cuckold of the world. Pronounce it “swipple”. Let it snap off the lips with pleasing hatefulness. It stands for “white person who gets a leetle chill down his neck when a black doctor is on the TV”. Remind the SWPL in your company that there is no moral obligation to uplift the world’s wretched refuse. If they balk, remind them again of their atheism.

Read here:
The Low Fertility Of Urban Liberals Is A Feature Not A Bug | Chateau Heartiste

 

[Moonglow]

I had 4 kids and a few I probably didn't know about.........

 

[Steinlight]

I had 4 kids and a few I probably didn't know about.........

You either aren't a liberal or are an outlier. SWPL Betaboys don't have 4 kids and possibly more. Unless you just pretend to be the liberal/feminist to give women the tingles like Ryan Gosling does.

Another possibility is you are getting cuckolded by your wife, you might wanna give those little bundles o' joy DNA tests to make sure you aren't getting taken for a ride.

 

[LonBabby]

How is babby formed?

 

[Steinlight]

How is babby formed?

Da ****?

 

[waltky]

New hope for infertile women...

Mouse implanted with ovaries made by 3D printer gives birth, offering new hope for infertile women
Thursday 18th May, 2017 — Infertile women have been offered new hope after scientists created ovaries on a 3D printer and used them to produce healthy offspring.

For the first time ever, U.S. researchers printed an artificial ovary and implanted it in a mouse, which went on to produce eggs, mate successfully, and give birth to healthy pups. Although the procedure has only been tested on animals so far, the long- term aim is to help restore fertility and hormone production in women who have undergone chemotherapy or who suffer from other infertility issues, such as polycystic ovaries. “The real breakthrough here is we’re building a real ovarian prosthesis and the goal of this project is to be able to restore fertility to young cancer patients who have been sterilized by their cancer treatment,” said Dr Teresa Woodruff, reproductive scientist director at the Women’s Health Research Institute, Northwestern University, Illinois. “Right now, we’re able to do that with young mice and the goal ultimately is to provide this to (human) patients.

The prosthetic ovaries, called scaffolds by scientists, were printed using liquid gelatin made from broken-down collagen, a natural material which is found in ligaments, tendons, muscles, bones and skin, researchers reported in the journal Nature Communications. The ovary walls were engineered to have a lattice-like porous structure, so they could interact with body tissues and trigger the production of eggs, while also being strong enough to cope with implantation. The sac-like structure also allows room for the egg cells to mature and ovulate and for blood vessels to form within the implant, enabling the hormones to circulate and trigger lactation after giving birth.

The procedure has only been tested on animals so far, but the long- term aim is to help restore fertility and hormone production in women who have undergone chemotherapy or who suffer from other infertility issues​

Dr Monica Laronda, co-lead author of the research, said: “What happens with some of our cancer patients is that their ovaries don’t function at a high enough level and they need to use hormone replacement therapies in order to trigger puberty. “Our technician removed the ovary of the mouse, replaced it with our scaffold, stitched it all back up and we mated some of those animals and we were able to get live birth. The team is now working on enlarging the scaffold so that it could be in tested on larger animals, and eventually humans.”

Martin Ledwick, the head cancer information nurse at Cancer Research UK, said: “Fertility preservation is an important issue for many patients whose treatment is likely to leave them infertile. It’s good to see research into new ways that might maintain fertility. But so far this work has only been done in mice so it’s not yet clear whether it might be useful for people in the future.”

Mouse implanted with ovaries made by 3D printer gives birth, offering new hope for infertile women

See also:

‘Astonishing’ hope for infertile women after cancer drug found to make ovaries produce new eggs
December 5, 2016 – Infertile women have been offered new hope after scientists found that a common cancer drug triggers the development of new eggs, an outcome previously thought to be impossible.

In a discovery hailed as “astonishing,” researchers at the University of Edinburgh proved that it is possible to reverse the clock and coax the ovaries back into a pre-pubescent state where they begin to produce new eggs. Women are born with all their eggs, which is why conceiving grows harder with age, as the eggs become old and damaged before running out entirely. But scientists noticed that women who had undergone chemotherapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma with a drug combination known as ABVD had up to 10 times the number of eggs as healthy women. Far from damaging the chance of having a baby, the cancer drugs actually have improved their fertility.

The researchers speculate that the shock of chemotherapy may trigger stem cells in the ovaries into producing new follicles, the hair-like structures that each produce a single egg. Lead researcher Evelyn Telfer of the University of Edinburgh’s school of biological sciences, said: “We were astonished when we saw what had happened to the tissue. It looked like pre-pubescent tissue with a high density of follicles and clustering that you don’t normally see in an adult. “We knew that ABVD does not have a sterilizing effect like some cancer drugs can, but to find new eggs being made, in such huge numbers – that was very surprising to see.”

Women who had undergone chemotherapy with ABVD had up to 10 times the number of eggs as healthy women.​

Telfer said the outcome of the study may prove to be “significant and far-reaching,” adding that “it is significant that the same effect was seen in all of the women on ABVD”. Scientists analyzed samples of ovarian tissue donated by 14 women who had undergone chemotherapy, alongside tissue from 12 healthy women. They found that the tissue from eight of the cancer patients treated with ABVD had between four and 10 times more eggs compared with tissue from women who had received a different chemotherapy, or healthy women of a similar age. The ovarian tissue was in healthy condition, appearing similar to tissue from young women’s ovaries.

Although the eggs are in an immature state, the scientists are trying to discover how they were created, then work out a way to bring them to maturity. It is unclear if the eggs in their current form would be functional. Charles Kingsland, a fertility expert at Liverpool Women’s Hospital, said: “This is a very small but extremely interesting study. It’s very early days but may give an insight as to how the ovary can make new eggs, which previously we thought was impossible.” The study was published in the journal Human Reproduction, and supported by the Medical Research Council.

‘Astonishing' hope for infertile women after cancer drug found to make ovaries produce new eggs

Related:

Wombs will be grown for infertile women from their own stem cells in 10 years, specialist says
June 22, 2016 - Infertile women could be implanted with new wombs grown from their own stem cells within 10 years, the doctor who achieved the first uterus transplant has predicted.

Professor Mats Brannstrom carried out the first womb transplant in 2014, which allowed a Swedish woman to give birth to a healthy baby boy. He has since undertaken nine more procedures, resulting in a total of five births. But he told a conference in Birmingham the future lies in bio-engineering, which lessens risk factors. At present, women undergoing the operation must be given strong immunosuppressant drugs to prevent their bodies from rejecting the new womb, which is donated by a family member or close friend. But if a new womb could be grown from their own stem cells no drugs would be needed and there would be fewer complications.

The doctor has performed several successful womb transplants​

Brannstrom told delegates that womb “patches” had already been successfully grown in rats from stem cells and the procedure could be perfected for humans within 10 or 15 years. “The concept is you create from stem cells of the recipient and transplant that into the recipient,” he told the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists world congress. “These may be the future, but we’ll of course need a lot of research,” he said, referring to a time frame of “not in five years, but perhaps in 10-15 years.”

Womb transplants help women suffering from Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility (AUFI), which occurs when a faulty or absent uterus prevents an embryo from implanting. AUFI affects around 12,000 women in Britain. Richard Smith, who leads the U.K. Uterine Transplant Research Programme, lauded Brannstom’s “very important proof of concept”, and said “the success of the Swedish team shows that at least some of these women will be able to bear their own child where before there was no hope.”

Wombs will be grown for infertile women from their own stem cells in 10 years, specialist says

 

[waltky]

Uncle Ferd willin' to do his part to help remedy the situation...

The U.S. fertility rate just hit a historic low. Some demographers worry it's a baby crisis
Saturday 1st July, 2017 - And, of course, demographers pin the blame on millennials, saying the supposedly coddled generation is delaying or opting out of parenthood entirely

The United States is in the midst of what some worry is a baby crisis. The number of women giving birth has been declining for years and just hit a historic low. If the trend continues – and experts disagree on whether it will – the country could face economic and cultural turmoil. According to provisional 2016 population data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday, the number of births fell 1 percent from a year earlier, bringing the general fertility rate to 62.0 births per 1,000 women ages 15 to 44. The trend is being driven by a decline in birthrates for teens and 20-somethings. The birthrate for women in their 30s and 40s increased – but not enough to make up for the lower numbers in their younger peers.

A country’s birthrate is among the most important measures of demographic health. The number needs to be within a certain range, called the “replacement level,” to keep a population stable so that it neither grows nor shrinks. If too low, there’s a danger that we wouldn’t be able to replace the aging workforce and have enough tax revenue to keep the economy stable. Countries such as France and Japan that have low birthrates have put pro-family policies into place to try to encourage couples to have babies. The flip side can also be a problem. Birthrates that are too high can strain resources such as clean water, food, shelter and social services, problems faced by India, where the fertility rate has fallen over the past few decades but still remains high. The debate now is about whether the United States is headed toward a “national emergency,” as some have feared, or whether this is a blip and the birthrate will level off soon. “It’s about millennials,” says Donna Strobino, a professor of population, family and reproductive health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Declining pregnancy rates have demographers worried we are headed toward a "baby crisis."​

Those supposedly entitled young adults with fragile egos born in the 2000s who live in their parents’ basements and hop from job-to-job — it turns out they’re also much less likely to have babies, at least so far. Some experts think millennials are just postponing parenthood while others fear they’re choosing not to have children at all. Strobino is among those who is optimistic and sees hope in the data. She points out that the fall in birthrates in teens – an age when many pregnancies tend to be unplanned – is something we want and that the highest birthrates are now among women 25 to 34 years of age. “What this is is a trend of women becoming more educated and more mature. I’m not sure that’s bad,” she explained.

Indeed, as fertility treatments have extended the age of childbearing, the birthrates among women who are age 40 to 44 are also rising. William Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, points out that despite the recent decline, the U.S. fertility rate still remains relatively high compared to many other developed countries like Germany and Italy. The United States also still has more births than deaths. And we still have a growing labor force. All these things mean, he said, “I don’t think that’s cause for alarm.” Frey attributed the decline in birthrates to a women’s “lifestyle” choice as well as the fact the economy has been in a funk. Times of economic downturn or uncertainty tend to cause a drop in birthrates, but when things turn around they tend to bounce back in a kind of catch-up period. “Every year I say when the economy is getting better then we’ll start having more children,” he said, “and I’m still expecting that to happen.”

The U.S. fertility rate just hit a historic low. Some demographers worry it’s a baby crisis

 

[JimBowie1958]

I had 4 kids and a few I probably didn't know about.........

What you did with those billy goats doesnt count, dude.

 

[Blackrook]

It's always true that those who believe in God have more children than those who don't believe in God. The younger generation, brainwashed in Democratically-run public schools, and subject to the influences of the gay promoting Hollywood culture, no longer sees a point in marriage, forming a family, or having children. We may see a great die-off, and depopulation throughout the West, but also in Russia, China, and Japan. Immigrants from poor, third-world countries will continue to have many children, and their children will take our places.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It's always true that those who believe in God have more children than those who don't believe in God. The younger generation, brainwashed in Democratically-run public schools, and subject to the influences of the gay promoting Hollywood culture, no longer sees a point in marriage, forming a family, or having children. We may see a great die-off, and depopulation throughout the West, but also in Russia, China, and Japan. Immigrants from poor, third-world countries will continue to have many children, and their children will take our places.

You wont see it in Russia. They have already turned their demographic numbers around and have a growing population.


They have learned their lessons after 80+ years of leftist rule.

 

[FJO]

It's always true that those who believe in God have more children than those who don't believe in God. The younger generation, brainwashed in Democratically-run public schools, and subject to the influences of the gay promoting Hollywood culture, no longer sees a point in marriage, forming a family, or having children. We may see a great die-off, and depopulation throughout the West, but also in Russia, China, and Japan. Immigrants from poor, third-world countries will continue to have many children, and their children will take our places.

I am a seventy-eight years old white guy, and happy that I will not see the day when white people will be the minority.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's always true that those who believe in God have more children than those who don't believe in God. The younger generation, brainwashed in Democratically-run public schools, and subject to the influences of the gay promoting Hollywood culture, no longer sees a point in marriage, forming a family, or having children. We may see a great die-off, and depopulation throughout the West, but also in Russia, China, and Japan. Immigrants from poor, third-world countries will continue to have many children, and their children will take our places.

Pretty amusing that you view the people who don't believe in absurd stories of magical beings guiding their lives as the ones who have been brainwashed.

 

[Meathead]

March 14, 2014 by CH

There is much hand-wringing by the hypocrati over the below-replacement fertility rates of overeducated, urban leftoid, credentialist suck-up, status whoring SWPLs. However will civilization carry on if our progressive snarkmeisters disappear down the sinkhole of Darwinian finality?

Well, I’m here to tell you that Western civilization will carry on quite well, and certainly better than it has the past 60 years. For evidence of the source of my sureness, review this quote by Thomas Aquinas on the Catholic Church’s prohibition of cousin marriage aka inbreeding:

"Afterwards, however, towards these latter times the prohibition [against cousin marriage] of the Church has been restricted to the fourth degree, because it became useless and dangerous to extend the prohibition to more remote degrees of consanguinity. Useless, because charity waxed cold in many hearts so that they had scarcely a greater bond of friendship with their more remote kindred than with strangers: and it was dangerous because through the prevalence of concupiscence and neglect men took no account of so numerous a kindred, and thus the prohibition of the more remote degrees became for many a snare leading to damnation."

Aquinas was a man who rightly perceived the dangers inherent in both too little and too much outbreeding. (Were we blessed with such wise men today!) Inbreeding encourages clan-based violence and decreases social trust, two consequences that are anathema to the development of modern civ. But too much outbreeding (EatPrayBang!) decreases charitable kin-feeling and incentivizes a decadent ennui that severs the citizen’s sense of obligation to his nation and co-ethnics.

Where is this thought leading? The native stock of the West is clearly suffering from a mental sickness caused by too much outbreeding. Universalism is the religion of liberal whites, and they cleave so strongly to this secular religion that they are happy, nay overjoyed!, to throw the borders open and bequeath their hard-won territory and culture to battalions of Third Worlders and other temperamentally distant aliens, who of course given large enough numbers will promptly, whether wittingly or consequentially, execute its destruction.

The liberal SWPLs’ universalist instinct is so deeply embedded that it’s become a danger to their own reproductive fitness. If it were just themselves they were (unproductively) screwing, that would be fine; unfortunately they’re screwing everyone who has to live under their administrative tyranny.

So it is with great sadistic glee that I put two and two together and conclude that the passing of the sweep of SWPL liberals into the prolapsed hole of history will prove, ultimately, a good thing for the reconstitution and continuation of Western civilization, and in particular of America. Whether through the act of some subconscious calculation, or environmental disincentive, or perhaps via a divinely directed cosmic rebalancing working magic on the impervious hindbrains of self-destructive fools, the children of universalist leftoids are fewer by the hour, and their complete demise closer by the day.

We should be welcoming this fitness adjustment for the ray of hope it delivers. Prosperity can turn on accidental fortune. Runaway universalism, it would appear, contains the seed of its doom, and in its death there will be rebirth. The gods of the copybook headings will have their laugh at last.

So pass out the condoms, fire up the abortion mills, parade the sluts, stream the cuck porn, shove those freebie Pills down the throats of SWPL princesses, and bask in your righteousness, knowing that your tribute in distasteful utilitarianism will pay handsome rewards to your posterity.

Truly, the SWPL is the cuckold of the world. Pronounce it “swipple”. Let it snap off the lips with pleasing hatefulness. It stands for “white person who gets a leetle chill down his neck when a black doctor is on the TV”. Remind the SWPL in your company that there is no moral obligation to uplift the world’s wretched refuse. If they balk, remind them again of their atheism.

Read here:
The Low Fertility Of Urban Liberals Is A Feature Not A Bug | Chateau Heartiste

Obviously, castration plays a hand.

 

[Cellblock2429]

March 14, 2014 by CH

There is much hand-wringing by the hypocrati over the below-replacement fertility rates of overeducated, urban leftoid, credentialist suck-up, status whoring SWPLs. However will civilization carry on if our progressive snarkmeisters disappear down the sinkhole of Darwinian finality?

Well, I’m here to tell you that Western civilization will carry on quite well, and certainly better than it has the past 60 years. For evidence of the source of my sureness, review this quote by Thomas Aquinas on the Catholic Church’s prohibition of cousin marriage aka inbreeding:

"Afterwards, however, towards these latter times the prohibition [against cousin marriage] of the Church has been restricted to the fourth degree, because it became useless and dangerous to extend the prohibition to more remote degrees of consanguinity. Useless, because charity waxed cold in many hearts so that they had scarcely a greater bond of friendship with their more remote kindred than with strangers: and it was dangerous because through the prevalence of concupiscence and neglect men took no account of so numerous a kindred, and thus the prohibition of the more remote degrees became for many a snare leading to damnation."

Aquinas was a man who rightly perceived the dangers inherent in both too little and too much outbreeding. (Were we blessed with such wise men today!) Inbreeding encourages clan-based violence and decreases social trust, two consequences that are anathema to the development of modern civ. But too much outbreeding (EatPrayBang!) decreases charitable kin-feeling and incentivizes a decadent ennui that severs the citizen’s sense of obligation to his nation and co-ethnics.

Where is this thought leading? The native stock of the West is clearly suffering from a mental sickness caused by too much outbreeding. Universalism is the religion of liberal whites, and they cleave so strongly to this secular religion that they are happy, nay overjoyed!, to throw the borders open and bequeath their hard-won territory and culture to battalions of Third Worlders and other temperamentally distant aliens, who of course given large enough numbers will promptly, whether wittingly or consequentially, execute its destruction.

The liberal SWPLs’ universalist instinct is so deeply embedded that it’s become a danger to their own reproductive fitness. If it were just themselves they were (unproductively) screwing, that would be fine; unfortunately they’re screwing everyone who has to live under their administrative tyranny.

So it is with great sadistic glee that I put two and two together and conclude that the passing of the sweep of SWPL liberals into the prolapsed hole of history will prove, ultimately, a good thing for the reconstitution and continuation of Western civilization, and in particular of America. Whether through the act of some subconscious calculation, or environmental disincentive, or perhaps via a divinely directed cosmic rebalancing working magic on the impervious hindbrains of self-destructive fools, the children of universalist leftoids are fewer by the hour, and their complete demise closer by the day.

We should be welcoming this fitness adjustment for the ray of hope it delivers. Prosperity can turn on accidental fortune. Runaway universalism, it would appear, contains the seed of its doom, and in its death there will be rebirth. The gods of the copybook headings will have their laugh at last.

So pass out the condoms, fire up the abortion mills, parade the sluts, stream the cuck porn, shove those freebie Pills down the throats of SWPL princesses, and bask in your righteousness, knowing that your tribute in distasteful utilitarianism will pay handsome rewards to your posterity.

Truly, the SWPL is the cuckold of the world. Pronounce it “swipple”. Let it snap off the lips with pleasing hatefulness. It stands for “white person who gets a leetle chill down his neck when a black doctor is on the TV”. Remind the SWPL in your company that there is no moral obligation to uplift the world’s wretched refuse. If they balk, remind them again of their atheism.

Read here:
The Low Fertility Of Urban Liberals Is A Feature Not A Bug | Chateau Heartiste

/---- My first cousin was smoking hot at 22 and the thought crossed my mind but the Church said that's a big no no.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com