'The Love-Muscle' must pay his bills

[dannyboys]

Billy has got to pay his bills. To do this he takes money at $500,000 a speech from the Russian mafia who in turn are allowed to purchase uranium bearing US property.
BTW. Who's Bill married to?
Bill Clinton on Getting Millions for Speeches I Got To Pay Our Bills - Breitbart

 

[TheOldSchool]

Yeah no former President besides Bill Clinton has ever been paid to speak anywhere

 

[mudwhistle]

Yeah no former President besides Bill Clinton has ever been paid to speak anywhere

He still gets a pension and a tax-free expense account for life from his time as president.
It would be interesting to find out exactly how much money he's getting from taxpayers in the Arkansas and everywhere else.

Not to mention his wife still has her license to practice law and his has most likely been reinstated. Instead they're out there collecting $500k per speaking engagement and collecting billions through their foundation in trade for special favors. This is the face of corruption.

 

[Hossfly]

Yeah no former President besides Bill Clinton has ever been paid to speak anywhere

Half a mil for a speech. What kind of message does that red-nosed, redneck cracker convey? Secrets of the universe? So his ho' can sell goodies to the reds?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Yeah no former President besides Bill Clinton has ever been paid to speak anywhere

He still gets a pension and a tax-free expense account for life from his time as president.
It would be interesting to find out exactly how much money he's getting from taxpayers in the Arkansas and everywhere else.

Not to mention his wife still has her license to practice law and his has most likely been reinstated. Instead they're out there collecting $500k per speaking engagement and collecting billions through their foundation in trade for special favors. This is the face of corruption.

Just like when they were in office ...


George W. Bush tops list of ex-presidents' expenses in 2012 at $1.3 million

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former President Bill Clinton's 8,300-square-foot Harlem office near the Apollo Theater costs taxpayers nearly $450,000. George W. Bush spends $85,000 on telephone fees, and another $60,000 on travel. Jimmy Carter sends $15,000 worth of postage - all on the government's dime.

Topping the list in 2012 was George W. Bush, who got just over $1.3 million last year.

 

[Moonglow]

Before Reagan became a politician and his legacy of an actor died out..The only way he stayed afloat was doing speeches.. If the idiots want to shell out those kind of bucks for a speech, there is no law against it..

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Apparently people don't want to spend near that much to hear GW.



George W. Bush racks up $15 million in speaking fees

That's undeniably a lot of dough--but consider how it stacks up against the fees collected by Bush's predecessor, former President Bill Clinton.


By the end of 2009--nine years after Clinton's final term--the former president had already earned $65 million in speaking fees, which included $7.5 million for 36 paid speeches in 2009 alone, according to CNN's analysis of wife Hillary Clinton's 2010 financial disclosure report. That's $208,000 per speech on average for 2009.

 

[Hossfly]

C.O.L.A.

 

[mudwhistle]

Before Reagan became a politician and his legacy of an actor died out..The only way he stayed afloat was doing speeches.. If the idiots want to shell out those kind of bucks for a speech, there is no law against it..

Rich people don't pay out that kind of cash for nothing. They expect something in return. And foreigners who shell out half a million per speech are expecting a lot.

 

[Hossfly]

Apparently people don't want to spend near that much to hear GW.



George W. Bush racks up $15 million in speaking fees
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/george-w-bush-racks-15-million-speaking-fees-192157129.html
That's undeniably a lot of dough--but consider how it stacks up against the fees collected by Bush's predecessor, former President Bill Clinton.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/george-w-bush-racks-15-million-speaking-fees-192157129.html
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/george-w-bush-racks-15-million-speaking-fees-192157129.html
By the end of 2009--nine years after Clinton's final term--the former president had already earned $65 million in speaking fees, which included $7.5 million for 36 paid speeches in 2009 alone, according to CNN's analysis of wife Hillary Clinton's 2010 financial disclosure report. That's $208,000 per speech on average for 2009.

That's probably because G.W. isn't a groveling money grubber like the Cuntons. He was wealthy before he was Governor and President. The other two are freeloaders.

 

[gipper]

This is more about the MSM double standard. Reagan did one speech in Japan for $1 million. The media crucified him for using the presidency to enrich himself...not so much with Billybob.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Apparently people don't want to spend near that much to hear GW.



George W. Bush racks up $15 million in speaking fees
That's undeniably a lot of dough--but consider how it stacks up against the fees collected by Bush's predecessor, former President Bill Clinton.
By the end of 2009--nine years after Clinton's final term--the former president had already earned $65 million in speaking fees, which included $7.5 million for 36 paid speeches in 2009 alone, according to CNN's analysis of wife Hillary Clinton's 2010 financial disclosure report. That's $208,000 per speech on average for 2009.

That's probably because G.W. isn't a groveling money grubber like the Cuntons. He was wealthy before he was Governor and President. The other two are freeloaders.

You musta missed this but ...

You're right that GW came from (bin Laden oil) money. That's how his daddy was able to buy the presidency for him. If he has so much money, why is he sucking at the public teat?

You really believe that if one is not born to money, they're "freeloaders"? Is that true for all presidents or only for the "other two"? And who are the "other two"?

You're quite a stupid person.

 

[dannyboys]

The fact that a couple of habitual crooks and con artists like the Clintons are the flag bearers for the DNC explains why the US is so fucked up.

 

[Katzndogz]

Because other presidents got speaking fees it's okay for Bill Clinton to sell uranium to the Russians.

It makes sense only to democrats.

 

[Moonglow]

Before Reagan became a politician and his legacy of an actor died out..The only way he stayed afloat was doing speeches.. If the idiots want to shell out those kind of bucks for a speech, there is no law against it..

Rich people don't pay out that kind of cash for nothing. They expect something in return. And foreigners who shell out half a million per speech are expecting a lot.

As far as I know that how they pass the bucks around also.

 

[Hossfly]

Apparently people don't want to spend near that much to hear GW.



George W. Bush racks up $15 million in speaking fees
That's undeniably a lot of dough--but consider how it stacks up against the fees collected by Bush's predecessor, former President Bill Clinton.
By the end of 2009--nine years after Clinton's final term--the former president had already earned $65 million in speaking fees, which included $7.5 million for 36 paid speeches in 2009 alone, according to CNN's analysis of wife Hillary Clinton's 2010 financial disclosure report. That's $208,000 per speech on average for 2009.

That's probably because G.W. isn't a groveling money grubber like the Cuntons. He was wealthy before he was Governor and President. The other two are freeloaders.

You musta missed this but ...

You're right that GW came from (bin Laden oil) money. That's how his daddy was able to buy the presidency for him. If he has so much money, why is he sucking at the public teat?

You really believe that if one is not born to money, they're "freeloaders"? Is that true for all presidents or only for the "other two"? And who are the "other two"?

You're quite a stupid person.