The liberal positions of self proclaimed "conservative" Republicans

Bass v 2.0

Biblical Warrior For God.
Jun 16, 2008
11,405
1,458
98
Pennsylvania
1. Loose interpretation of the Second Amendment which grants unrestricted access to firearms for all Americans.

2. Laisezz-faire free markets with no restrictions on what big businesses can do.

3. Little to no environmental restriction laws, just let everyone do what the hell they feel free to do until environmental problems become very serious and even then just deny it.

4. Little to no taxation.


There are more things, I'm just getting started.
 
These aren't actual Conservative ideas, they're just your interpretation of them.

These are ideas that are embraced by retards who like calling themselves conservatives, there's not much of anything conservative about the Republican Party.

Do you have anything like actual evidence that anyone credible holds those beliefs? I realize that's hitting below the belt here.
 
These are ideas that are embraced by retards who like calling themselves conservatives, there's not much of anything conservative about the Republican Party.

Do you have anything like actual evidence that anyone credible holds those beliefs? I realize that's hitting below the belt here.

Your kidding right? I.mean a simple google search will score you 100's of articles on each of these first four subjects.
again stop it.with the sudden " why what are you talking about" amnesia. Its stupid and nobody is.buying it.

Then you wont have any problem bringing a credible source for this, right?
 
Your kidding right? I.mean a simple google search will score you 100's of articles on each of these first four subjects.
again stop it.with the sudden " why what are you talking about" amnesia. Its stupid and nobody is.buying it.

Then you wont have any problem bringing a credible source for this, right?

Not right now. Im on my phone at work. Maybe later if the baby doesn't fuse.
You got nothing. As usual.
Neg repped for being a 'tard.
 
1. Loose interpretation of the Second Amendment which grants unrestricted access to firearms for all Americans.

2. Laisezz-faire free markets with no restrictions on what big businesses can do.

3. Little to no environmental restriction laws, just let everyone do what the hell they feel free to do until environmental problems become very serious and even then just deny it.

4. Little to no taxation.


There are more things, I'm just getting started.

Assuming your characterization of their position is accurate - which it isn't - what is "liberal" about any of those positions?
 
1. Loose interpretation of the Second Amendment which grants unrestricted access to firearms for all Americans.

2. Laisezz-faire free markets with no restrictions on what big businesses can do.

3. Little to no environmental restriction laws, just let everyone do what the hell they feel free to do until environmental problems become very serious and even then just deny it.

4. Little to no taxation.


There are more things, I'm just getting started.

Assuming your characterization of their position is accurate - which it isn't - what is "liberal" about any of those positions?

That was what I was wondering.
 
1. Loose interpretation of the Second Amendment which grants unrestricted access to firearms for all Americans.

2. Laisezz-faire free markets with no restrictions on what big businesses can do.

3. Little to no environmental restriction laws, just let everyone do what the hell they feel free to do until environmental problems become very serious and even then just deny it.

4. Little to no taxation.


There are more things, I'm just getting started.

historyguideku7.jpg
 
Those are conservative positions. Why would anyone call them liberal?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
During the Republican Presidential Debate, MB said she would dismantle the EPA. Could that be considered "Eco-Friendly"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These are ideas that are embraced by retards who like calling themselves conservatives, there's not much of anything conservative about the Republican Party.

Do you have anything like actual evidence that anyone credible holds those beliefs? I realize that's hitting below the belt here.

During the Republican Presidential Debate, MB said she would dismantle the EPA. Could that be considered "Eco-Friendly"?

Considering the EPA is all about more government control and not the environment, i doubt the environment would be much effected.

It's capitalism that has created the greatest eco friendly products for the world.
 
Protecting pornography as a freedom of speech

Little to no restriction on campaign financing.

It as the Republican controlled Supreme Court that make companies "citizens". That opened the floodgates for unlimited money.
 
Do you have anything like actual evidence that anyone credible holds those beliefs? I realize that's hitting below the belt here.

During the Republican Presidential Debate, MB said she would dismantle the EPA. Could that be considered "Eco-Friendly"?

Considering the EPA is all about more government control and not the environment, i doubt the environment would be much effected.

It's capitalism that has created the greatest eco friendly products for the world.

Yea, that's right. It's all about government control. Nothing to do with the environment. What flavor Kool-aid?
 
During the Republican Presidential Debate, MB said she would dismantle the EPA. Could that be considered "Eco-Friendly"?

Considering the EPA is all about more government control and not the environment, i doubt the environment would be much effected.

It's capitalism that has created the greatest eco friendly products for the world.

Yea, that's right. It's all about government control. Nothing to do with the environment. What flavor Kool-aid?
What does the EPA do?

Hint: They regulate business.
 
Protecting pornography as a freedom of speech

Little to no restriction on campaign financing.

It as the Republican controlled Supreme Court that make companies "citizens". That opened the floodgates for unlimited money.

Corporations have had citizen status since their inception. Would you prefer we weren't able to sue these huge corporations?
 
1. Loose interpretation of the Second Amendment which grants unrestricted access to firearms for all Americans.

I wouldn’t call it a ‘loose interpretation,’ it’s as valid as a collective rights argument. The problem for conservatives is that Scalia’s use of ‘original understanding’ flies in the face of libertarians’ and the far right’s ‘originalism’ dogma.

…there's not much of anything conservative about the Republican Party.
Can’t argue with that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top