The Liberal Global Cooling Scare of the 70s...

[Luddly Neddite]

The Liberal Global Cooling Scare of the 70s...

Is that the NINETEEN 70s?

LOL

BTW,

 

[ClosedCaption]

Idiot.

A 29% increase in Arctic Ice the same year your MMGW Leader Predicted it would all be gone is just one of Endless Examples that you guys are Wrong...

This is a lie. You cant show or link to what you just said

This is a picture of space. The stuff around the earth is mans trash. Do you believe that man can effectively change space as shown above but are unable to change the earth? If so, you're funny

No matter how many "Peer Reviewed" studies the True Believers create to support what they Concluded without and evidence in the first place.



peace...

The Peer reviewed studies are the evidence. You throw out the studies and say you never seen evidence. Thats because you just chucked it over your shoulder

You do realize that those dots are tracking dots of much smaller things in space around the earth... YOU try and make it look like some huge amount of obstruction.. most trash of man in space is MINISCULE...

When you look at ACTUAL pics, you do not have what YOU try and PORTRAY as being there

Wait so you admit theres a bunch of trash you're mad because it looks like its large trash.

How could humans effect space when they have NO effect on Earth? This is puzzling!

I didnt do anything btw...Scientist (the people you dont believe) made that picture. Google space trash and use anyone you want to if you dont like it

This is National Geographic. Dont like it? Find a telescope and a pen and tell them why they are wrong.

Then again, just like your response above, You agree with what I say you just dont like the way it looks lol

 

[DiamondDave]

The Liberal Global Cooling Scare of the 70s...

Is that the NINETEEN 70s?

LOL

BTW,

There are federal snow plows on state roads??

Fail, idiot

 

[ClosedCaption]

Dave admits theres trash in space which is caused by humans he's just upset that the picture I used made it look like "large" trash. Whatever that means...I think Dave believes theres a bunch of Coke cans and Evian Bottes floating in space

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

Yes bullshit supported by 7 whole people. 7.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

Yes bullshit supported by 7 whole people. 7.

Yes, bullshit science then and bullshit science now. Glowarm theories along with glocool theories give real scientists a bad reputation.

 

[edthecynic]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

Deniers back then and deniers now.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

Yes bullshit supported by 7 whole people. 7.

Yes, bullshit science then and bullshit science now. Glowarm theories along with glocool theories give real scientists a bad reputation.

Yes 7 whole scientists predicted cooling. 7.

Nice way to pick the exception and make an example out of them because thats hard to do *he said with a smirk*

 

[edthecynic]

The Liberal Global Cooling Scare of the 70s...

Is that the NINETEEN 70s?

LOL

BTW,

There are federal snow plows on state roads??

Fail, idiot

State socialism is OK but federal is not.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It just shows how ignorant we are of geological cycles. It was bullshit back then and its bullshit now.

Deniers back then and deniers now.

Whatever noun that you want to use will suffice. Looks like the deniers were correct in both instances. Keep worshipping your glowarm though if it makes you feel good.

 

[DiamondDave]

This is a lie. You cant show or link to what you just said

This is a picture of space. The stuff around the earth is mans trash. Do you believe that man can effectively change space as shown above but are unable to change the earth? If so, you're funny



The Peer reviewed studies are the evidence. You throw out the studies and say you never seen evidence. Thats because you just chucked it over your shoulder

You do realize that those dots are tracking dots of much smaller things in space around the earth... YOU try and make it look like some huge amount of obstruction.. most trash of man in space is MINISCULE...

When you look at ACTUAL pics, you do not have what YOU try and PORTRAY as being there

Wait so you admit theres a bunch of trash you're mad because it looks like its large trash.

How could humans effect space when they have NO effect on Earth? This is puzzling!

I didnt do anything btw...Scientist (the people you dont believe) made that picture. Google space trash and use anyone you want to if you dont like it

This is National Geographic. Dont like it? Find a telescope and a pen and tell them why they are wrong.

Then again, just like your response above, You agree with what I say you just dont like the way it looks lol

About as impacting as the lint ball on the 45 yard line of the stadium... there may be 500K pieces of various sizes of debris.. but you PURPOSELY posted the pic to make it look like something it is not... there is not a trash dilemma, just as there is not this huge man made climate dilemma... you, like ones in your chicken little environment, make things overblown and something they are not

The very same scientists at NASA posted the pics I placed in contradiction to your misleading pic.. showing no high density of trash like you are trying to show

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yes bullshit supported by 7 whole people. 7.

Yes, bullshit science then and bullshit science now. Glowarm theories along with glocool theories give real scientists a bad reputation.

Yes 7 whole scientists predicted cooling. 7.

Nice way to pick the exception and make an example out of them because thats hard to do *he said with a smirk*

I didn't pick these bogus arrogant theories such as glowarm an glocool.

 

[DiamondDave]

Dave admits theres trash in space which is caused by humans he's just upset that the picture I used made it look like "large" trash. Whatever that means...I think Dave believes theres a bunch of Coke cans and Evian Bottes floating in space

Actually there are pieces of various size.. MOST of which are minuscule (nuts, bolts, metal fragments, hammers, etc).. and in perspective to the vast space around earth, we do not have some heavy coverage of trash

 

[DiamondDave]

Is that the NINETEEN 70s?

LOL

BTW,

There are federal snow plows on state roads??

Fail, idiot

State socialism is OK but federal is not.

States have the power to do things in their constitutions... things that the fed cannot do... (unlike what you guys want to hear)

Now, a road, being for complete public use, is not the same as handouts to individuals based on subjective criteria... nor does the state take away from the ownership and maintenance of private roads.. nor do they mandate that you must do all road building thru them or meat their criteria for your private road

But hey.. just because a government has to power to post roads, they must have the power to take control of all services, right??

Idiot progressives

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yes, bullshit science then and bullshit science now. Glowarm theories along with glocool theories give real scientists a bad reputation.

Yes 7 whole scientists predicted cooling. 7.

Nice way to pick the exception and make an example out of them because thats hard to do *he said with a smirk*

I didn't pick these bogus arrogant theories such as glowarm an glocool.

No but you did choose to go with the one that no scientist agrees with as proof of how wrong scientist are.

 

[mal]

About as impacting as the lint ball on the 45 yard line of the stadium... there may be 500K pieces of various sizes of debris.. but you PURPOSELY posted the pic to make it look like something it is not... there is not a trash dilemma, just as there is not this huge man made climate dilemma... you, like ones in your chicken little environment, make things overblown and something they are not

The very same scientists at NASA posted the pics I placed in contradiction to your misleading pic.. showing no high density of trash like you are trying to show

peace...

 

[ClosedCaption]

You do realize that those dots are tracking dots of much smaller things in space around the earth... YOU try and make it look like some huge amount of obstruction.. most trash of man in space is MINISCULE...

When you look at ACTUAL pics, you do not have what YOU try and PORTRAY as being there

Wait so you admit theres a bunch of trash you're mad because it looks like its large trash.

How could humans effect space when they have NO effect on Earth? This is puzzling!

I didnt do anything btw...Scientist (the people you dont believe) made that picture. Google space trash and use anyone you want to if you dont like it

This is National Geographic. Dont like it? Find a telescope and a pen and tell them why they are wrong.

Then again, just like your response above, You agree with what I say you just dont like the way it looks lol

About as impacting as the lint ball on the 45 yard line of the stadium... there may be 500K pieces of various sizes of debris.. but you PURPOSELY posted the pic to make it look like something it is not... there is not a trash dilemma, just as there is not this huge man made climate dilemma... you, like ones in your chicken little environment, make things overblown and something they are not

The very same scientists at NASA posted the pics I placed in contradiction to your misleading pic.. showing no high density of trash like you are trying to show

So the pic from scientist makes you think it looks like there is a trash dilemma but you say its not a dilemma because you say so. Just like your proof that man has no impact on the earths climate relies on you opening your mouth and saying its not true.

Well that is pretty convincing. Who do I believe? Scientist with facts, data and research? Or some old fart yelling "Not TRUE"?

Let me think about this....

 

[mal]

The very same scientists at NASA posted the pics I placed in contradiction to your misleading pic.. showing no high density of trash like you are trying to show

So the pic from scientist makes you think it looks like there is a trash dilemma but you say its not a dilemma because you say so. Just like your proof that man has no impact on the earths climate relies on you opening your mouth and saying its not true.

Well that is pretty convincing. Who do I believe? Scientist with facts, data and research? Or some old fart yelling "Not TRUE"?

Let me think about this....

Has ClosedCaption always been Truthmatters level of Stupid?...



peace...

 

[ClosedCaption]

The very same scientists at NASA posted the pics I placed in contradiction to your misleading pic.. showing no high density of trash like you are trying to show

So the pic from scientist makes you think it looks like there is a trash dilemma but you say its not a dilemma because you say so. Just like your proof that man has no impact on the earths climate relies on you opening your mouth and saying its not true.

Well that is pretty convincing. Who do I believe? Scientist with facts, data and research? Or some old fart yelling "Not TRUE"?

Let me think about this....

Has ClosedCaption always been Truthmatters level of Stupid?...



peace...

Sick burn bro, you're cool