The Leftist Gripe about Gerrymandering

Discussion in 'Politics' started by DGS49, Oct 5, 2017.

  1. DGS49
    Offline

    DGS49 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    5,762
    Thanks Received:
    1,207
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Ratings:
    +4,594
    It's actually pretty simple.

    There is a cultural convergence between people who tend to live in densely-populated urban areas and people to lean Left politically.

    Academics, people who work for government, artistes, people who rely heavily on government support and people who believe in Big Government, unionists, homosexuals, and feminists, all, for one reason or another, gravitate to urban centers.

    Everyone else - and I won't categorize them - tends to move to the suburbs, or they originate from rural areas or small towns, and remain there for life.

    So when it comes time to carve up congressional districts, the urban areas end up being 80% Democrat, while the suburban and rural areas tend to be 60% Republican.

    Maxine Waters wins with 90% of the vote, while her rural Republican counterpart out in the sticks wins with 55% of the vote. At the end of the day, there are more Republican representatives than there are Democrat representatives (both Federal and State), even though more than half of the voters voted Democrat.

    There is NOTHING that the Supreme Court CAN do or WILL do to change this. If they try, then the Federal courts will spend the first four years of every decade trying to rationalize how the congressional districts SHOULD HAVE been carved up...and it won't make a damn bit of difference.

    Don't you just love it?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. martybegan
    Online

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    41,374
    Thanks Received:
    5,717
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +21,015
    Meanwhile progressives will carve up urban areas with multiple districts to make sure certain minorities get at least a few "safe" seats for each group.
     
  3. Mr.Blonde
    Online

    Mr.Blonde Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    807
    Thanks Received:
    144
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +694
    Gerrymandering has some effect, but not as big as they claim.

    This is just an excuse like Russia for Democrats losing. If there is all this hate towards Republicans like Democrats claim no amount of Gerrymandering would help.

    The real reason is Democrats have abandoned the middle class for every minority group and illegal immigrants.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. DGS49
    Offline

    DGS49 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    5,762
    Thanks Received:
    1,207
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Ratings:
    +4,594
    Leftist leaders cater to the ignorant among their supporters. The Ignorami believe that gerrymandering is the reason why there are more Democrats than Republicans, yet Republicans have more seats in the legislatures. As explained above, the reason is not gerrymandering, but culture.
     
  5. Bootney Lee Farnsworth
    Offline

    Bootney Lee Farnsworth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    8,749
    Thanks Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Shithole
    Ratings:
    +7,492
    75 years of payback is a bitch.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. BluesLegend
    Offline

    BluesLegend Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    30,749
    Thanks Received:
    5,379
    Trophy Points:
    1,510
    Location:
    Trump's Army
    Ratings:
    +33,608
    BINGO! Mr. Blonde nailed it, "The real reason is Democrats have abandoned the middle class for every minority group and illegal immigrants."
     
  7. Seawytch
    Offline

    Seawytch Information isnt Advocacy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    34,427
    Thanks Received:
    4,747
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    Peaking out from the redwoods
    Ratings:
    +10,398
    5. Republicans drew Congressional boundaries in six of the 10 most-gerrymandered states.

    In addition to North Carolina, Republicans drew district boundaries in Louisiana, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Alabama. Democrats drew districts in West Virginia and Illinois, in addition to Maryland. Boundaries in Kentucky were drawn up by that state's mixed legislature.


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/new...ngressional-districts/?utm_term=.73bbbdd198b0
     
  8. Bootney Lee Farnsworth
    Offline

    Bootney Lee Farnsworth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    8,749
    Thanks Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Shithole
    Ratings:
    +7,492
    75 years of payback is a cocksucking bitch.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. Defiant1
    Offline

    Defiant1 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    5,161
    Thanks Received:
    760
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +2,829

    The reality is if there wasn't gerrymandering the Democrats would have less seats.

    Districts are based on raw population. Not party, age, citizenship, or legality. They are also equally sized re: population.
    In Florida every district is no more than + or - 1 person.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. bear513
    Online

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    40,579
    Thanks Received:
    5,144
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +25,514

    Yup democrats have held control.of most of the cities for DECADES and cities like Chicago have not had a Republican mayor in almost a hundred years...all due to gerrymandering, it took a long time for republicans to catch on and play the Democrat game.
     

Share This Page