The left needs to show leadership.

Those of you on this board are all busy name calling, making up shit about real protests, calling people dissatisfied with Obama and the Liberals in Congress as astro turf and delusional. You berate the right for being bitter over the past treatment of Bush and the current treatment of everyone not a liberal.

Go ahead actually show us some leadership. Stop being petty and vindictive, stop making shit up. Stop name calling and lying about who and why people are protesting. Stop playing the race card every chance you get.

Actually show us the supposed leadership you want to inspire.

Get your Congressman, Senators and the President to actually show some leadership instead of petty bully tactics and Chicago style politics.

I realize this will not happen, but for once in your adult life act like a leader and not a partisan hack. YOU control the Country, you have 265 votes in the House, 59 votes in the Senate and the President is a Democrat. Quit claiming Republicans are blocking anything and admit you have the power. If you can not pass things it is not because of Republicans, it is because DEMOCRATS do not agree with your policies and plans, with your legislation and your bills.

Quit claiming that 55 Republican Senators ran the whole show under Bush but 60 and now 59 Democrats ( with independents) can not do the same. GROW the hell up and act like leaders.

What the hell have you been smoking, Gunny? Can someone show me a fact in this post, ANYWHERE? Please?
 
Gunny's assertions fall flat. They have no support. Don't worry, Gunny, the gang of six in the Senate are almost there with a deal, and Obama has told the liberals in the House if they want continued Presidential patronage they will get in line. Health care reform is going to pass and you are going to help pay for it, you lucky careerist you.
 
I hate to repeat this for the 50th time, but the majority of Democrats do not consider themselves Liberal.

So while you may paint with your very very broad brush there RGS, you're wrong. Also, the fact you think there are so many Liberals in congress is laughable AT BEST. Seriously, if there were as many Liberals in congress as you think, things would be a lot different.

The President is the most Liberal Senator ever to serve and Pelosi and Reed are in lock step with him. BUT that is the whole point, they can not pass what they want because it is objectionable to a LOT of Democrats as well. Until they wise up and realize that they will continue to fail or be forced to do as they are doing now with health care and simply LIE about what it is the bill says. Obama either LIED to that joint session of Congress or is to stupid to have actually read the bill. You pick which.

As for this board it is full of Liberal people calling names, treating non liberals as trash and telling us to suck it up, being two faced about what they did for 9 years now while demanding we simply lay down and take their crap.

Show some leadership.

You mean like the leadership who lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction? Who tried to get us into another war and now blame the Afghanistan War on President Obama who did not even vote on it!!

No, what the Republicans need to do is stop their childish behavior because you lost. We had AN ELECTION!!!! Democrats WON!!! Quit bellyaching that you are not heard. You had your chance and completely F**ked up our country.

I am not saying I am a big fan of the public spending but after Bush, I really don't think I will vote republican until they stop spending like they did and stop acting like sore losers and have actual civil discourse.
 
I hate to repeat this for the 50th time, but the majority of Democrats do not consider themselves Liberal.

So while you may paint with your very very broad brush there RGS, you're wrong. Also, the fact you think there are so many Liberals in congress is laughable AT BEST. Seriously, if there were as many Liberals in congress as you think, things would be a lot different.

The President is the most Liberal Senator ever to serve and Pelosi and Reed are in lock step with him. BUT that is the whole point, they can not pass what they want because it is objectionable to a LOT of Democrats as well. Until they wise up and realize that they will continue to fail or be forced to do as they are doing now with health care and simply LIE about what it is the bill says. Obama either LIED to that joint session of Congress or is to stupid to have actually read the bill. You pick which.

As for this board it is full of Liberal people calling names, treating non liberals as trash and telling us to suck it up, being two faced about what they did for 9 years now while demanding we simply lay down and take their crap.

Show some leadership.

Good lord, RGS, don't give them TIPS.

Oh, never mind. They're just dead-head libs, they can't learn, anyway.
 
you and many others may want to vote for socialist candidate next time, then.

:eusa_eh: Elvis, we've been over this before. You remember the poll numbers I showed you no? How the majority of Democrats actually considered themselves either Socially Conservative and or Fiscally Conservative.

Then how do class the current crop of ass clowns we have running Congress? They certainly ARE NOT fiscally conservative nor socially conservative.
 
yeah see I think robert wants the kind of government France has. which is probably considered socialist.

Not at all. However, don't say the majority of Democrats in Congress or this country are Liberal when they aren't. I mean hell, the Libertarians have become Liberal than Democrats. Which is why I may actually join that party or at least vote for it in the near future.

Well technically libertarians have always been more liberal than so-called liberal Democrats if you want to be a stickler for terms. Classical liberalism, true liberalism in my opinion, is closest to libertarianism.
 
I hate to repeat this for the 50th time, but the majority of Democrats do not consider themselves Liberal.

So while you may paint with your very very broad brush there RGS, you're wrong. Also, the fact you think there are so many Liberals in congress is laughable AT BEST. Seriously, if there were as many Liberals in congress as you think, things would be a lot different.

The President is the most Liberal Senator ever to serve and Pelosi and Reed are in lock step with him. BUT that is the whole point, they can not pass what they want because it is objectionable to a LOT of Democrats as well. Until they wise up and realize that they will continue to fail or be forced to do as they are doing now with health care and simply LIE about what it is the bill says. Obama either LIED to that joint session of Congress or is to stupid to have actually read the bill. You pick which.

As for this board it is full of Liberal people calling names, treating non liberals as trash and telling us to suck it up, being two faced about what they did for 9 years now while demanding we simply lay down and take their crap.

Show some leadership.

You mean like the leadership who lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction? Who tried to get us into another war and now blame the Afghanistan War on President Obama who did not even vote on it!!

No, what the Republicans need to do is stop their childish behavior because you lost. We had AN ELECTION!!!! Democrats WON!!! Quit bellyaching that you are not heard. You had your chance and completely F**ked up our country.

I am not saying I am a big fan of the public spending but after Bush, I really don't think I will vote republican until they stop spending like they did and stop acting like sore losers and have actual civil discourse.

We blame Obama for the Afghanistan war because he hasn't ended it in his almost 8 months in office, and has sent more troops to Afghanistan. You can't distance yourself from a war that you've supported and made worse.
 
Hey, doesn't that make them...NEO CONS???

Well a neo-con is defined as someone who believes in big government but pretends to be a conservative Republican. So technically progressives could be considered neo-cons, other than they don't pretend to be conservatives.
 
Those of you on this board are all busy name calling, making up shit about real protests, calling people dissatisfied with Obama and the Liberals in Congress as astro turf and delusional. You berate the right for being bitter over the past treatment of Bush and the current treatment of everyone not a liberal.

Go ahead actually show us some leadership. Stop being petty and vindictive, stop making shit up. Stop name calling and lying about who and why people are protesting. Stop playing the race card every chance you get.

Actually show us the supposed leadership you want to inspire.

Get your Congressman, Senators and the President to actually show some leadership instead of petty bully tactics and Chicago style politics.

I realize this will not happen, but for once in your adult life act like a leader and not a partisan hack. YOU control the Country, you have 265 votes in the House, 59 votes in the Senate and the President is a Democrat. Quit claiming Republicans are blocking anything and admit you have the power. If you can not pass things it is not because of Republicans, it is because DEMOCRATS do not agree with your policies and plans, with your legislation and your bills.

Quit claiming that 55 Republican Senators ran the whole show under Bush but 60 and now 59 Democrats ( with independents) can not do the same. GROW the hell up and act like leaders.

That's wishful thinking Retired GT Seargant but the word liberal and the word leader both start with an L but that's where it ends also. Liberals are not leaders. Just as Obama is not a leader, he throws everything to Pelosi to write up and then wonders why his words and the legislation don't jive. Nice try though.
 
Hey, doesn't that make them...NEO CONS???

Well a neo-con is defined as someone who believes in big government but pretends to be a conservative Republican. So technically progressives could be considered neo-cons, other than they don't pretend to be conservatives.

Considering "neo-conservatives" have their roots in the Democratic Party I find this quite telling.
 
Hey, doesn't that make them...NEO CONS???

Well a neo-con is defined as someone who believes in big government but pretends to be a conservative Republican. So technically progressives could be considered neo-cons, other than they don't pretend to be conservatives.

Considering "neo-conservatives" have their roots in the Democratic Party I find this quite telling.

Exactly. Many of them switched from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party for whatever reason.
 
Well a neo-con is defined as someone who believes in big government but pretends to be a conservative Republican. So technically progressives could be considered neo-cons, other than they don't pretend to be conservatives.

Considering "neo-conservatives" have their roots in the Democratic Party I find this quite telling.

Exactly. Many of them switched from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party for whatever reason.

Here's the reason- they are Reagan Democrats and conservative to boot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top