The left continues to deny basic science

[iceberg]

I already posted to YOU a list of times your morons got caught fudging data to suit the agenda

All of the data that supports AGW has been fudged be crooked scientists?

I'm past tired of dancing with your stupid ass.

You should stick to cheerleading in these conversations.

you should stick to being pissed there's only 1 prize in crackerjacks.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I already posted to YOU a list of times your morons got caught fudging data to suit the agenda

All of the data that supports AGW has been fudged be crooked scientists?

I'm past tired of dancing with your stupid ass.

You should stick to cheerleading in these conversations.

you should stick to being pissed there's only 1 prize in crackerjacks.

Notice how the dope skirts the fact they have been caught fudging and even making up data? Fckn loser

 

[otto105]

all warming must be uniform to be acknowledged by you idiots?

There are two kinds of science deniers. One actually is too stupid to understand, and the other is a partisan snake that simply doesn't care about reality.

Can YOU post one scientific organization that supports your position that GW caused by human activities is NOT happening.


There has to be one willing to sell out their integrity.

 

[LaDairis]

All of the data that supports AGW has been fudged be crooked scientists?

The raw data is as follows...

Atmosphere = no warming
Oceans = no warming
Surface of growing urban areas = warming .... why? URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT. As cities grow, they warm... just right there
breakout in cane activity = nope
ocean rise = nope
net planetary ice melt = nope

The FRAUD of Global (non) Warming is the DELIBERATE misinterpretation of the URBAN HEAT SINK EFFECT on the SURFACE GROUND TEMPERATURE SERIES, the ONLY data showing any warming at all....

 

[LaDairis]

Allow me to reiterate.

That's all a parrot ever does, because with a BIRDBRAIN, endlessly repeating that which has been debunked and answered fully is what you are capable of, and nothing beyond it....



BAWK!!!

 

[otto105]

all warming must be uniform to be acknowledged by you idiots?

There are two kinds of science deniers. One actually is too stupid to understand, and the other is a partisan snake that simply doesn't care about reality.

Confounding, now having caught up on the thread, I see your fighting the scientific side.

My apologies for asking you about the scientific org.

 

[otto105]

Allow me to reiterate.

That's all a parrot ever does, because with a BIRDBRAIN, endlessly repeating that which has been debunked and answered fully is what you are capable of, and nothing beyond it....



BAWK!!!

Can YOU name one scientific organization which supports your view that GW/CC caused by humans is not happening?

 

[LaDairis]

There are plenty

Global Warming Skeptic Organizations (2013)


Once again, what we observe of LEFT WING SCIENCE INVALID PARROTS is that they are only capable of doing one thing .... PARROTING...


They cannot defend the data fudging. They cannot argue the "sinking islands" fraud. They don't have any truth at all.

But they can parrot. And parrot they will...

My guru is superior to your data documented TRUTH, or something like that...

 

[otto105]

There are plenty

Global Warming Skeptic Organizations (2013)


Once again, what we observe of LEFT WING SCIENCE INVALID PARROTS is that they are only capable of doing one thing .... PARROTING...


They cannot defend the data fudging. They cannot argue the "sinking islands" fraud. They don't have any truth at all.

But they can parrot. And parrot they will...

My guru is superior to your data documented TRUTH, or something like that...

The AEI is NOT a scientific organization.

A Mericans for Prosperity is NOT a scientific organization.

ALEC is NOT a scientific organization.


Why was this listed offered in the first place.

 

[DBA]

This is partly true, because we know how biased many "experts" can be.

You think all of the relevant experts have been compromised by political bias?

No, not all, but I think many/most have. Many have also fallen into the group think trap. Believe it or not, it can happen to intelligent folks as well.

 

[DBA]

sold out for the grant money

They'd secure more grant money by finding new information that contradicts what the majority are saying. You are ignorant top to bottom.

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, quite the opposite actually. There is money to be made on global warming hysteria, but not the other way around.

 

[DBA]

all warming must be uniform to be acknowledged by you idiots?

There are two kinds of science deniers. One actually is too stupid to understand, and the other is a partisan snake that simply doesn't care about reality.

The idea that we can stop or change global warming is not even close to a settled science, even by the partisan scientist that have an agenda.

 

[Lesh]

There's one small problem the the premise of this thread.

It's pure bullshit

Temperatures over the last 100+ Years

 

[otto105]

all warming must be uniform to be acknowledged by you idiots?

There are two kinds of science deniers. One actually is too stupid to understand, and the other is a partisan snake that simply doesn't care about reality.

The idea that we can stop or change global warming is not even close to a settled science, even by the partisan scientist that have an agenda.

So, it's your position that the lowering of our carbon emissions to slow man-made CC/GW is an unproven way?

 

[LaDairis]

Why was this listed offered in the first place.

LOL!!!!


because the "Union of Left Wing Liars concerned that their taxpayer funding may end" hates the truth they put out....


You PARROTS are all the same. You don't understand basic science. You cannot answer any questions. All you can do is BAWK that your "guru" is better than the truth, since the truth is way beyond your comprehension....

Sad, really. You live life with a paper bag over your head....


BTW, we went to COURT in 2007....


Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

No correlation between Co2 and temps.

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica GROWING....

BUT BUT BUT did a "qualified" "climate" "scientist" agree????????

 

[otto105]

Why was this listed offered in the first place.

LOL!!!!


because the "Union of Left Wing Liars concerned that their taxpayer funding may end" hates the truth they put out....


You PARROTS are all the same. You don't understand basic science. You cannot answer any questions. All you can do is BAWK that your "guru" is better than the truth, since the truth is way beyond your comprehension....

Sad, really. You live life with a paper bag over your head....


BTW, we went to COURT in 2007....


Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

No correlation between Co2 and temps.

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica GROWING....

BUT BUT BUT did a "qualified" "climate" "scientist" agree????????

Again, can you post one scientific organization that supports your belief that GW/CC is not happening?


Seems that you're struggling to produce one.

 

[LaDairis]

can you post one scientific organization

I need a guru to PARROT.

I can't understand DATA or COURT CASES or why three island chains are sinking but nothing else is...

I need a GURU to PARROT

because that's all my BIRDBRAIN is capable of doing

 

[Lesh]

So your idiotic position is that Global Warming is NOT happening?

Jesus

 

[LaDairis]

So your idiotic position is that Global Warming is NOT happening?

The Earth is not warming.

Co2 has nothing to with Earth climate change.

That is the truth of the DATA, and the COURT CASE your side did not appeal.

Do you think "the ice is melting" when the COURT ruled that 90% of Earth's ice on Antarctica is GROWING??

That is where you are, a mindless sub human with no ability in science or thinking....

You are a LEFT WING PARROT.

And you will never be anything but....

 

[The Original Tree]

Why is there an XX & XY Chromosome but no GAY Chromosome?