http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2174.html I doubt that this latest hockeystick will get retracted like Gergis2012 (same batch of authors BTW) because it is more honest in describing how they cherrypick proxies to get a hockeystick shaped graph. would you like to see the 100+ proxies that are already screened to produce a predetermined result? all data is from the SI at Nature. and of course the mean, with Neukom's results added as I have said before, be careful of proxy reconstructions. especially the estimated standard deviations of error. thanks to Willis. Neukom?s Science By Proxy | Watts Up With That?. Duke Neukom?s Secret Sauce | Watts Up With That? and of course to Steve. Neukom and Gergis Serve Cold Screened Spaghetti « Climate Audit it doesnt matter if you are a warmer or a denier. if you read those links you will know more about the process of producing a proxy reconstruction.