the latest HockeyStick, Neukom2014

Discussion in 'Environment' started by IanC, Apr 6, 2014.

  1. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,309
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,160
    http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2174.html

    I doubt that this latest hockeystick will get retracted like Gergis2012 (same batch of authors BTW) because it is more honest in describing how they cherrypick proxies to get a hockeystick shaped graph.

    would you like to see the 100+ proxies that are already screened to produce a predetermined result?

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    all data is from the SI at Nature.

    and of course the mean, with Neukom's results added

    [​IMG]

    as I have said before, be careful of proxy reconstructions. especially the estimated standard deviations of error.

    thanks to Willis. Neukom?s Science By Proxy | Watts Up With That?. Duke Neukom?s Secret Sauce | Watts Up With That?

    and of course to Steve. Neukom and Gergis Serve Cold Screened Spaghetti « Climate Audit

    it doesnt matter if you are a warmer or a denier. if you read those links you will know more about the process of producing a proxy reconstruction.
     
  2. Matthew
    Offline

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    34,599
    Thanks Received:
    2,488
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +4,609
    Doesn't make any sense...The proxies say the opposite from his conclusion :(
     
  3. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,309
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,160
    I wouldnt say the 'opposite'. I would say that they dont say much of anything at all.

    and the proxies for gergis ,marcott and shakun were just as equivical, with time direction and size problems. remember, these are the ones that were selected! it is hard to believe that the one discarded were even more random.
     
  4. Abraham3
    Offline

    Abraham3 BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,289
    Thanks Received:
    160
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +161
    What do YOU mean when you say "hockeystick", Ian?
     
  5. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,309
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,160
    hockeystick graphs? shaped like a hockeystick. the upwards blade can be made by many methods. the most popular are by combining low sensitivity, low variance proxy data with high variance, high sensitivity instrumental data and/or poor methodology to select and train proxy data to show a spurious upward trend.
     
  6. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    63,654
    Thanks Received:
    10,938
    Trophy Points:
    860
    Ratings:
    +15,610
    Amazing.

    It's Fraud, pure, outright fraud.
     
  7. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    15,581
    Thanks Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +2,335
    More like witchcraft.. I love the way the final result for the 18th, 19th, and early 20th century departs so dramatically from the ACTUAL means.. If i gave a crap, id love to read that explanantion.... All of that period is plotted BELOW the actual data means...
     
  8. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,309
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,160


    the paper gives a description of their method but not the actual code. so far it has not been reverse engineered to account for the odd final results but I am certain that the usual group of statisticians will decipher it presently. perhaps similar errors that were found in Gergis2012 will reappear and this paper will be sent to the zombie zone as well.
     
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    19,413
    Thanks Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    247
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +3,021
    nobody cares.......the hockey stick was proven to be a myth years ago now.
     
  10. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    7,309
    Thanks Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,160
    Skooks- I agree that few people care. but it is exactly this sort of information that the public should be exposed to because it shows how weak the evidence for 'unprecedented' global warming really is. posters like Abe honestly believe that proxy reconstructions are accurate and robust enough to just add instrumental data to, even though they are two different types of data. he is not alone, the world has been conditioned to accept this type of misdirection since Mann98.
     

Share This Page