The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Martin Timothy, Feb 21, 2010.

  1. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    The bullet hole was there after it came through the windshield. It was captured at frame 255. As everyone can see it closely resembles a bullet hole in a windshield. The darkness in the center indicates a hole that is surrounded by froth. This fact was confirmed many years ago. SHUT THE KUFC OFF!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    altgens 6 - Google Search
     
  2. KokomoJojo
    Offline

    KokomoJojo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,792
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +188
    you are betting on the wrong pony in this race.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    seems there is a lot of head glare going around.

    If you watch kellers head you can see the glars follows it precisely. while 7 can come up with really good shit shit sometimes he is not real good at video forensics.
     
  3. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    Just what I need, (kokojoe) someone not throwing their support my way when I've supported him in the past. Him and I are obsessed with photos and videos. He may be tapping me, encouraging me to answer. I may just answer my calling. I think I can.

    The passenger's head snaps back in (Nix film) those hurried moments. This debunks the careful movement with the white blob in Zapruder. The blob wasn't added to the other two films or Mary Moorman's pic.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  4. KokomoJojo
    Offline

    KokomoJojo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,792
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +188
    I dont support anyone. If I see some I agree with I agree if not I disagree not much more to it than that. I will look at this, do you have a source with a good avi dubdown since the only ones I have seen have to much digital artifact issues for my taste.
     
  5. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    One can only work with what's available. Maybe there's a better copy of the nix film, idk. Groden had to zoom in on the limo because the original had a distant shot. We can see where I got the close-up of Greer slowing down.

    Advance to 1:09 for the close-up. Robert Groden narrarates but ignores Greer's left arm movement and focuses on the headshot.

    jfk assassination films-orville nix - Video Dailymotion



    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  6. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    Jfk slumped to his left, which explains perfectly why the left side of the shirt was covered in blood. The gaping exit wound was located in the right rear and top rear.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  7. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    This gif shows the rear skull coming off. What else does it show?

    [​IMG]
     
  8. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    JFK Lancer Information Archives

    The front of his head was clear of damage. That, according to all the evidence except the x-rays. The rear exploded just as I've described for years. Frames 313, 319, and 320 all show the damage to the rear. I'd love to see any fact denier argue with Jackie's bullet proof account of the rear skull being badly damaged. You got no guts, nor any facts to back your delusions. The bullet entered just above the right eye, which blasted out the right rear.

    Jackie, being the closest eyewitness after the shot, makes her testimony very important in locating exactly where the exit wound was. She describes what so many others did, and now she's confirmed correct by exposing the rear exit wound was always visible in frame 313.

    "I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been.

    "But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."

    Dallas, TX -- August 5, 2001 -- JFK Lancer, an historical research firm reports that the Court Reporter's tape shows Jacqueline Kennedy's testimony before the Warren Commission had additional descriptions which were withheld.

    Junkkarinen adds, "Why they would withhold an accurate description is open to debate, but the fact that they put out an altered transcript is telling. How many other transcripts may have fallen victim to the same shenanigans? This is a find that proves alteration of original evidence, and that is important.

    [​IMG]

    FRAME 319

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  9. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    56,636
    Thanks Received:
    6,338
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +24,575
    Bump
     
  10. 7forever
    Offline

    7forever VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    1,756
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +72
    You can't have it both ways by saying he was shot from the front, while not dealing with there being no clear exit wound in the rear. I've solved this problem by showing that the exit wound in the rear (WAS ALWAYS THERE) is there in the most important frame, 313. There's no longer an excuse for having it both ways. All anyone had to do was admit the film was altered and demonstrate exactly why that was apparent.

    You want to pretend the film was NOT altered and also impose that stupidity on my work. The jfk death involves a lot of fabricated evidence. I've done a good job (for the internet) of explaining those alterations and why they were done.

    Frames 326-330 show the right-front-skull missing which clearly did not happen, therefore the film was altered based on that fact alone. Frame 328 compared to 317 demonstrates how obvious the alteration was and is today in 2016.

    The outline of missing skull in the x-ray matches 328 and the others, including the fake red blob in 313.

    https://sites.google.com/site/lightb.../mpi/z300-z349

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page



Search tags for this page
fart sniffer
,
ferengi meme
,

fred newcomb jfk

,

fred newcomb jfk escort

,

jfk assassination

,
jfk assassination head
,
jfk assassination head shot photos
,
jfk assassination pictures head
,
jfk autopsy
,

kennedy altgens

,

phantom on the hill jfk

,
potti pics with steeming