The Jim Crow Laws - How It Effects Everyone Today

[chops_]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

 

[Sunni Man]

Please give an example of one still being enforced today? ...

 

[JGalt]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

What, you mean like having someone show a proper ID card before they can vote?

Tough titties.

 

[chops_]

Please give an example of one still being enforced? ...

"I think it's very easy to brush off the notion that the system operates much like a caste system, if in fact you are not trapped within it. I have spent years representing victims of racial profiling and police brutality and investigating patterns of drug law enforcement in poor communities of color, and attempting to help people who have been released from prison attempting to 're-enter' into a society that never seemed to have much use to them in the first place. And in the course of that work, I had my own awakening about our criminal justice system and this system of mass incarceration. ... My experience and research has led me to the regrettable conclusion that our system of mass incarceration functions more like a caste system than a system of crime prevention or control."

 

[Sunni Man]

^^^^^ Translation: I got nothing. .....

 

[MarathonMike]

 

[MaryL]

Well, in Juneau, Alaska it is Illegal to bring your flamingo into a barbershop. Intolerance of flamingos will no longer be tolerated!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

Such as?

 

[Mike Dwight]

What a vicious name for these laws, political era made. there's black minstrelsy then there's that Jim Crow song, its like, look at me spin around, I like grabbing all the ladies, betterwatch out , I jump turn around my name's jim crow. We got local state laws in all 50 states, I hope we got some definitions. imprisoned Japanese in world war 2. now when the businesses went along and said, I get customers with a black store and a white store and I get a profit, that's culture and business and they had to make "Laws" to stop it, correct? there weren't laws that said, make a black entrance and a white entrance. That's Southern Hospitality and southern magnolias with a mint julep on the side.

I don't think the 1900 Lost Cause and the 1960 Jim Crow repeal should be just thrown together like your author is doing. Confederate veterans marched around in reunion parades with unhappy blackwomen center decorations with the refreshment treys, and civil war enthusiast and movie fans thought the ku klux klan was the newest movie fan club, way to stay social.

I actually hate the desegregation ruling, how is it this simple logic, "separate things cannot be equal". They decided blacks and whites can't have separate nondiscriminatory schooling, with some beside the point study, black girls point at white dolls and say they're smart and/or pretty, is that FIXED now? From their ruling? They're not solving the universe with exhibit A.

I'm actually trying to say the 1900 era Democrat party just tossed in the Black vote as voting for their great Benefactors, and that's the real direct disenfranchisement in some form as it existed up To 1960.
How do people expect probably a million men served these State governments , obviously states owe duties to veterans, I know, a million blacks need to enroll To these States, with some religious belief or another and let us know about some nondiscriminatory laws they'd like.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

 

[TNHarley]

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If Jim Crow Laws impact how Blacks are today, why not have Nuremberg Laws impact how Jews, or Poles are?
Why not have Soviet operations impact how Ukrainians, Poles, and Germans are, or why not have British Colonialism impact how Asian Indians are.

These are all "History", that's the thing.

History has some impact, but actually the ones I listed were much worse than Jim Crow Laws for Blacks.
Considering the major genocides I listed, and major oppression.

But, every single group I've listed seems to be doing better off in some ways, or even all ways than African-Americans, then the big question becomes " how come?"

 

[Mike Dwight]

We can say FDR's 3 terms were transformational for the Democrat party... From early FDR to late FDR! FDR! Or maybe, the works progress administration, the New Deal, or maybe because the Misses wanted to fly with Tuskegee airmen. Really, votes switched hands more around Eisenhower and Republican action, look at how Eisenhower describes equal treatment of this government regardless of class, and he's referring to blacks in Republican speak. So if the Party of Lincoln, faceless no history citizenship, you know, sees an active switch from the Northern Industrialists to a Southern base these 50 years, its somewhere in there, and the Southern Racist Democrats became minority, went into an ignorable Democrat minority again just in time for a Civil War Dixie centennial Dixiecrat George Wallace. As for the accused 'welfare state' of sizable black democrats, I Don't know a singular champion of the new Democrats. There is no formality of even having a Two-party system as fluid as whoever the Heck the voters are this cycle.

A Before-the-War , non-coverup, viewpoint, in the middle, in the summation, in the median, was Paternalism. Majority slave-owners would identify in the concepts of Paternalism. So don't mind my correction that Nazi exterminations aren't benchmarks in one aspect I understand. We took 300,000 slaves and made 4,000,000 racially pure Aryan ,(Whatever!) blacks at a faster population growth than USA average by the end of slavery. They had letters to write to relatives! The lies about literacy restriction late in slavery, the Master wrote to other plantations, there's hundreds of these. Nazi was a convenient chant of all restrictionist moral reform type mindsets after world war 2, Dixie as a political rallying ideal is actually difficult in that climate. Some didn't interact with slaves, some felt a personality cult around the Master appropriate, (Downton Abbey! yay!)some were abusive. a Black concept is hard to find in Brazil where 10,000,000 slaves were sent in an *UNDEFENDABLE* "Peculiar Institution" , where not 10,000,000 would claim to be black or something Like this number, because if you are all mixed from slavewomen "MARRIAGE" into the religion and the ingroup catholic culture, reminds of the psanish racism charts with 20 grade-class names between , black,spanish, or indian-types, that sure would be different from One-drop.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

I see nothing wrong with voter ID so long as it's only a state ID and not a national ID.

That's what the article was about, why didn't you mention anything about the actual substance of the article?

Most states a social security card or a vehicle registration will do.

 

[IM2]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

This is some retard shit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

This is some retard shit.

All who have read your posts bow to your expertise in that area.

 

[IM2]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

This is some retard shit.

All who have read your posts bow to your expertise in that area.

All have done nothing. Your post is retarded.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

This is some retard shit.

All who have read your posts bow to your expertise in that area.

All have done nothing. Your post is retarded.

You demand another spanking???

Sure....



1. First, the Nazis copied the Progressives/Democrats Immigration Policies.

Only the ‘right races’ welcomed.

“Progressives opposed immigration and enacted several immigration restrictions during the 1920s. Progressives also tried to force immigrants to adopt Progressive moral beliefs.” Progressive Movement - Ohio History Central

And… Immigrant Restrictions During the Progressive Era | Synonym

Hitler lauded the Progressives’ immigration policies.

“By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain racesfrom naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the folkish state concept.”
“Mein Kampf,” chapter three



“Hitler also appealed to the racially exclusionary provisions of U.S. immigration laws, specifically the 1924 Immigration Act that had been pushed by American progressives as a model of enlightened eugenic legislation. “There is today one state,” Hitler noted, “in which at least weak beginning toward a better conception are noticeable. Of course it is not our German Republic but the American union. By refusing immigration on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalization, it professes in slow beginnings a view which is peculiar to the Volkish state concept.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

How about Franklin Roosevelt's attitude toward other races....?
"This attitude dovetails with what is known about FDR's views regarding immigrants in general and Asian immigrants in particular.... He recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had "blood of the right sort." FDR's troubling view of Jews

Sieg Heil, Franklin????



2. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

“…history of laws against miscegenation—interracial marriage or procreation—in the United States.

Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help it…” The Race Against Race

“The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.”
Adolph Hitler
Untitled Document


“At Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ‘undesireables’???


“…Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

Hitler’s views—which closely parallel Sanger’s—provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting “imbeciles” and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his “The Case for Sterilization.”
(Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

German race science stood on American progressive’s shoulders.


4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

5. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”

When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes


If it weren’t so tragic, it’d be funny: the Progressives/Democrat’s programs were too rigid for the Nazis.


Amazing.



“…the Nazis balked at defining Jews as anyone possessing “one drop” of Jewish blood in line with the Democratic “one drop rule.” Incredibly the Nazis rejected the one-drop precedent of their American counterparts as too harsh. They defined a Jew as one who has predominant Jewish ancestry—usually characterized by three Jewish grandparents.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




6. The three considered the most Progressive Presidents….all had racist political views.

Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government.

FDR chose as his first Supreme Court nominee, a KKKer.

LBJ led the fight against anti-lynching laws.


7. And….the Nazis praised FDR’s policies as nearly identical to theirs.

The National Socialists hailed FDR’s ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”

b. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’

c. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”

d. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.


8. The Nazis love the Democrat policies of ‘enslave and colonize.’

Many know that Andrew Jackson is considered to be the father of the modern Democrat Party.

Will…..in that case, he should also be remembered as at least a step-father of "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei,” Hitler’s bunch.


You see, another thing the Nazis learned from the Democrats was use to push the ‘Untermenschen’ out of the way to gain ‘lebensraum.’


“….what did Hitler learn from the Democratic Party and from his fellow leftists in America? First, he credited his plan of lebensraum or “living space”—specifically, his plan to forcibly seize the land in Russia, Poland and Eastern Europe, and enslave the native inhabitants—to the Jacksonian Democrats. In a 1928 speech, Hitler noted that Americans in the Jacksonian Era had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”


Historian Timothy Snyder makes the same point in Bloodlands, “As Hitler imagined the future, Germany would deal with the Slavs much as the North Americans had dealt with the Indians.” Using a formula developed by the Democrats, Hitler sought to drive the Poles, Russians and Slavs from their land; dispatch Germans to take it over; and enslave the conquered peoples that refused to leave.


Notice that Rich and Snyder, who are both progressives, never mentioned the term “Democrat.” They are content to say that Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears. This is the actual precedent that Hitler appealed to in formulating his plans of conquest, dispossession and enslavement.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



9. Hitler “…. did, however, learn how to frame his policies of racial discrimination and Nordic supremacy, his lebensraum strategy of mass displacement and subjugation, and his genocidal mechanisms for exterminating the “unfit,” from his fellow leftists and progressives in the United States.

This is the disgraceful legacy of the Democratic left. Scholars and media pundits who know this history are deeply frightened by it. They realize that if young people discover it, if it comes to become widely known, then the whole progressive Democratic project will be discredited. No longer will progressives be able to pose as the part of the good, the true and the beautiful; on the contrary, they will be exposed as a partly complicit in racism, mass murder and genocide.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats

 

[blastoff]

Even today the remnants of The Jim Crow Laws are in place in some states.

Goes to show you, there are people out there that really are "color-blind" when it comes to Racism.

1. Just to be certain that you understand what you are speaking of....Jim Crow laws were instituted by the Democrat Party, and maintained by the Democrats.

In fact, to this day, they are irked that the Republicans pried their slaves away from them.




Further, the Nazis used the policies of the Progressives and the Democrats as their model.


2. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.

In “Hitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,” by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ‘black’ and inserted the word ‘Jew.’


“Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.” Dinesh D’Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




3. From the LATimes:

“At a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American [Democrat] jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes



4. although the Nazis used the Democrat doctrines, Jim Crow and segregation laws as their model…..


….wait for it…..


….the Nazis found them TOO HARSH!!!!!



“And the ugly irony is that when the Nazis rejected American [Democrat] law, it was often because they found it too harsh. For example, Nazi observers shuddered at the "human hardness" of the "one drop" rule, which classified people "of predominantly white appearance" as blacks. To them, American [Democrat] racism was sometimes simply too inhumane.


That may sound implausible — too awful to believe — but in their early years in power, the Nazis were not yet contemplating the "final solution." At first, they had a different fate in mind for the German Jewry: Jews were to be reduced to second-class citizenship and punished criminally if they sought to marry or engage in sexual contact with "Aryans." The ultimate goal was to terrify Germany's Jews into emigrating.”
When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes

This is some retard shit.

To the uneducated.