The Jewish Police State

[georgephillip]

"Since the six-day war in 1967 an estimated 750,000 Palestinians have been incarcerated in Israeli prisons, including 23,000 women and 25,000 children. This constitutes, Richard Falk states 'approximately 20 per cent of the total Palestinian population in the occupied territory or 40 per cent of the Palestinian male population there.' Staggering figures of those personally imprisoned, whist a whole nation is held captive intimidated by an illegal occupying power upon their homeland."

Incarcerated Inside Israel » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Israel constantly ratifies international agreements regarding the sanctity of human rights without applying the same principles in Occupied Palestine.

Maybe there's more money in Occupation than in Peace?

 

[DreyfussRan]

I dare say you've struck the bullseye with this concluding observation: aside from the empty media-poses that Israel desires only a peaceful existance, the record clearly contradicts this nonsense...peace offers very little to the Israelis--in fact it is downright counter-productive when we pause to consider its broader implications: it would force permanent borders--something Israel has doggedly restisted for decades...peace might obstruct the billions that Israel receives from U.S. taxpayers...it would curtail theri illegal settlement program, and do away with the military checkpoints...the routine harassment...the control over every vital aspect of Palestinian life..."peace" is the "terrorism" they fear...

 

[Hossfly]

Two masterdebaters at work. Educational.

 

[georgephillip]

I dare say you've struck the bullseye with this concluding observation: aside from the empty media-poses that Israel desires only a peaceful existance, the record clearly contradicts this nonsense...peace offers very little to the Israelis--in fact it is downright counter-productive when we pause to consider its broader implications: it would force permanent borders--something Israel has doggedly restisted for decades...peace might obstruct the billions that Israel receives from U.S. taxpayers...it would curtail theri illegal settlement program, and do away with the military checkpoints...the routine harassment...the control over every vital aspect of Palestinian life..."peace" is the "terrorism" they fear...

Since the major Arab states first offered their peace plan at the UNSC in 1976:

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with 'minor and mutual modifications,' to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas).

"A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

Since 1967, at least, Israel has served as the chief strategic asset for the US in the Middle East.
Profits from arms sales and the sale of Arab oil are the biggest reasons the Jewish State exists today, imho.

 

[docmauser1]

"Since the six-day war in 1967 an estimated 750,000 Palestinians have been incarcerated in Israeli prisons, including 23,000 women and 25,000 children. This constitutes, Richard Falk states 'approximately 20 per cent of the total Palestinian population in the occupied territory or 40 per cent of the Palestinian male population there.'

What an appauling testimony as to the depth crime has permeated the disfunctional semi-feudal palistanian society!

Staggering figures of those personally imprisoned, whist a whole nation is held captive intimidated by an illegal occupying power upon their homeland." Israel constantly ratifies international agreements regarding the sanctity of human rights without applying the same principles in Occupied Palestine.

Honorable P F Tinmore constantly reminds us, albeit indirectly that there's no occupation, since palistanians have lost nothing, and we tend to believe this occupational expert, of course.

Maybe there's more money in Occupation than in Peace?

Of course! It's palistanian occupation! If the international community stops heeding that palistanian "gimme money!!" routine, the latter will be getting a life and a job.

 

[Ariux]

Two masterdebaters at work. Educational.

And, here comes Hossfly the tool with his two-shits worth.

 

[docmauser1]

Two masterdebaters at work. Educational.

And, here comes Hossfly the tool with his two-shits worth.

Let's not be bitter, we're having an interesting discussion, of course, like what's so bad about the jewish police state, if the majority of the police is jewish?

 

[editec]

The occupied territories are a war zone.

Occupying armies tend to offer something less than good humanitarian rule.

The Palestinians are basically living under martial law.

 

[jillian]

The occupied territories are a war zone.

Occupying armies tend to offer something less than good humanitarian rule.

The Palestinians are basically living under martial law.

last i heard they ran gaza. they don't do it well? no kidding.

and if they don't like violence, not lobbing missiles might be a good idea.

 

[pbel]

I dare say you've struck the bullseye with this concluding observation: aside from the empty media-poses that Israel desires only a peaceful existance, the record clearly contradicts this nonsense...peace offers very little to the Israelis--in fact it is downright counter-productive when we pause to consider its broader implications: it would force permanent borders--something Israel has doggedly restisted for decades...peace might obstruct the billions that Israel receives from U.S. taxpayers...it would curtail theri illegal settlement program, and do away with the military checkpoints...the routine harassment...the control over every vital aspect of Palestinian life..."peace" is the "terrorism" they fear...

Since the major Arab states first offered their peace plan at the UNSC in 1976:

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with 'minor and mutual modifications,' to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas).

"A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

Since 1967, at least, Israel has served as the chief strategic asset for the US in the Middle East.
Profits from arms sales and the sale of Arab oil are the biggest reasons the Jewish State exists today, imho.

It doesn't matter what the entire World wants in the ME...Military Power still rules and Israelis through their moneyed friends in America have harnesed this power trough AIPAC giving a tiny minority life and death decisions over us with 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan and soon Iran...

Until we adopt Campaign Finance Laws that prohibit people like Casino Mogul Adelson who has an Israeli wife a hundred million dollars to the Republicans for Israel, we are losers.

 

[docmauser1]

It doesn't matter what the entire World wants in the ME...Military Power still rules and Israelis through their moneyed friends in America have harnesed this power trough AIPAC giving a tiny minority of life and death over us with 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan and soon Iran...Until we adopt Campaign Finance Laws that prohibit people like Casino Mogul Adelson who has an Israeli wife a hundred million dollars to the Republicans for Israel, we are losers.

Fascinating drivel.

 

[irosie91]

you have to admit----both Peeballs and Georgie have memorized the jihado nazi script almost perfectly

 

[pbel]

its easy to be truthfull

 

[docmauser1]

its easy to be truthfull

Nah, shooting drivel from the hip isn't being truthful, of course, it's being full.

 

[irosie91]

Peeballs can you provide that list you promised?----contributions to politicians are public record------please compile that list you promised in which you prove that AIPAC is controlling all federal politicians with HUGE CONTRIBUTIONS thank you in advance

 

[pbel]

AIPAC doesn't contribute directly but directs its friends on who to contribute...like Adelson's hundread million via his Israeli wife.

 

[docmauser1]

AIPAC doesn't contribute directly but directs its friends on who to contribute...like Adelson's hundread million via his Israeli wife.

Chauvinistic much?

 

[irosie91]

FROM PEEBALLS

AIPAC doesn't contribute directly but directs its friends on who to contribute...like Adelson's hundread million via his Israeli wife.


oh gee------I did not get my AIPAC directive yet ------they are late
this year------usually it comes at the beginning of the month of ELUL
ZOG is much more effiicient------I have my orders for the ENTIRE DECADE

 

[georgephillip]

I dare say you've struck the bullseye with this concluding observation: aside from the empty media-poses that Israel desires only a peaceful existance, the record clearly contradicts this nonsense...peace offers very little to the Israelis--in fact it is downright counter-productive when we pause to consider its broader implications: it would force permanent borders--something Israel has doggedly restisted for decades...peace might obstruct the billions that Israel receives from U.S. taxpayers...it would curtail theri illegal settlement program, and do away with the military checkpoints...the routine harassment...the control over every vital aspect of Palestinian life..."peace" is the "terrorism" they fear...

Since the major Arab states first offered their peace plan at the UNSC in 1976:

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with 'minor and mutual modifications,' to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas).

"A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

Since 1967, at least, Israel has served as the chief strategic asset for the US in the Middle East.
Profits from arms sales and the sale of Arab oil are the biggest reasons the Jewish State exists today, imho.

It doesn't matter what the entire World wants in the ME...Military Power still rules and Israelis through their moneyed friends in America have harnesed this power trough AIPAC giving a tiny minority life and death decisions over us with 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan and soon Iran...

Until we adopt Campaign Finance Laws that prohibit people like Casino Mogul Adelson who has an Israeli wife a hundred million dollars to the Republicans for Israel, we are losers.

There's a lot more money in occupation than there is in peace:

"The U.S. and Israel have been acting in tandem to extend and deepen the occupation. In 2005, recognizing that it was pointless to subsidize a few thousand Israeli settlers in Gaza, who were appropriating substantial resources and protected by a large part of the Israeli army, the government of Ariel Sharon decided to move them to the much more valuable West Bank and Golan Heights.

"Instead of carrying out the operation straightforwardly, as would have been easy enough, the government decided to stage a 'national trauma,' which virtually duplicated the farce accompanying the withdrawal from the Sinai desert after the Camp David agreements of 1978-79.

"In each case, the withdrawal permitted the cry of 'Never Again,' which meant in practice: we cannot abandon an inch of the Palestinian territories that we want to take in violation of international law.

"This farce played very well in the West, though it was ridiculed by more astute Israeli commentators, among them that country's prominent sociologist the late Baruch Kimmerling."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

 

[Hossfly]

Since the major Arab states first offered their peace plan at the UNSC in 1976:

"The fact that the Israel-Palestine conflict grinds on without resolution might appear to be rather strange. For many of the world's conflicts, it is difficult even to conjure up a feasible settlement. In this case, it is not only possible, but there is near universal agreement on its basic contours: a two-state settlement along the internationally recognized (pre-June 1967) borders -- with 'minor and mutual modifications,' to adopt official U.S. terminology before Washington departed from the international community in the mid-1970s.

"The basic principles have been accepted by virtually the entire world, including the Arab states (who go on to call for full normalization of relations), the Organization of Islamic States (including Iran), and relevant non-state actors (including Hamas).

"A settlement along these lines was first proposed at the U.N. Security Council in January 1976 by the major Arab states. Israel refused to attend the session. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, and did so again in 1980. The record at the General Assembly since is similar."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

Since 1967, at least, Israel has served as the chief strategic asset for the US in the Middle East.
Profits from arms sales and the sale of Arab oil are the biggest reasons the Jewish State exists today, imho.

It doesn't matter what the entire World wants in the ME...Military Power still rules and Israelis through their moneyed friends in America have harnesed this power trough AIPAC giving a tiny minority life and death decisions over us with 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan and soon Iran...

Until we adopt Campaign Finance Laws that prohibit people like Casino Mogul Adelson who has an Israeli wife a hundred million dollars to the Republicans for Israel, we are losers.

There's a lot more money in occupation than there is in peace:

"The U.S. and Israel have been acting in tandem to extend and deepen the occupation. In 2005, recognizing that it was pointless to subsidize a few thousand Israeli settlers in Gaza, who were appropriating substantial resources and protected by a large part of the Israeli army, the government of Ariel Sharon decided to move them to the much more valuable West Bank and Golan Heights.

"Instead of carrying out the operation straightforwardly, as would have been easy enough, the government decided to stage a 'national trauma,' which virtually duplicated the farce accompanying the withdrawal from the Sinai desert after the Camp David agreements of 1978-79.

"In each case, the withdrawal permitted the cry of 'Never Again,' which meant in practice: we cannot abandon an inch of the Palestinian territories that we want to take in violation of international law.

"This farce played very well in the West, though it was ridiculed by more astute Israeli commentators, among them that country's prominent sociologist the late Baruch Kimmerling."

A Middle East Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): In Washington-Speak, "Palestinian State" Means "Fried Chicken"

The Jews aren't fighting for their existance because of money, Dhimwit.