Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Multiple times, as outlined earlier. All quite true. It was not my intention to force you out of the closet. My profound apologies....Sure you voted Republican and I am the tooth fairy...
Quite true; however, they oftentimes DO care about Abuse of Power, Conspiracy to Extort and Bribe, Misuse of Federal funds, etc....Look, swing voters only care about certain things and Ukraine is not one of them!...
Unless he phukks-up and abuses his power to his gain, at the expense of US national interests and security. Which he has.Jobs, pay, cost of living, and 401k are all the swing voter care most about then it come to Immigration and so on, so as long as the economy is strong and no major wars or attacks then Trump wins the Electoral College again...
Couldn't care less, so long as your POS is impeached....Biden is your Mondale...
By this time you should be able to recognize that no law need be broken in impeachments cases. The "high crimes' is from England, and the founders used the same words, but America does not have high crimes. There are a number of books on impeachment, and the few I have pretty much agree on the process and history.Yeah, funny how they couldn't cite a single specific law that was broken. This whole thing is ludicrous.
He used government money to bribe a foreign leader to get dirt on a politioal foe.Did IT? What what? The 300 page report lists no crime. It’s Mueller 2.Trump did it. It is obvious he did it.When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.
300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.
Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf
Quit your fucking whining
Did Biden get investigated?He used government money to bribe a foreign leader to get dirt on a politioal foe.Did IT? What what? The 300 page report lists no crime. It’s Mueller 2.Trump did it. It is obvious he did it.When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.
300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.
Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf
Quit your fucking whining
Maybe in Trumpland, that is OK.
But it is not in America
By this time you should be able to recognize that no law need be broken in impeachments cases. The "high crimes' is from England, and the founders used the same words, but America does not have high crimes. There are a number of books on impeachment, and the few I have pretty much agree on the process and history.Yeah, funny how they couldn't cite a single specific law that was broken. This whole thing is ludicrous.
ORANGE MAN BEAT THE CHOSEN ONEBy this time you should be able to recognize that no law need be broken in impeachments cases. The "high crimes' is from England, and the founders used the same words, but America does not have high crimes. There are a number of books on impeachment, and the few I have pretty much agree on the process and history.Yeah, funny how they couldn't cite a single specific law that was broken. This whole thing is ludicrous.
Did Biden get investigated?He used government money to bribe a foreign leader to get dirt on a politioal foe.Did IT? What what? The 300 page report lists no crime. It’s Mueller 2.Trump did it. It is obvious he did it.When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.
300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.
Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf
Quit your fucking whining
Maybe in Trumpland, that is OK.
But it is not in America
Oops.
He should. His quid pro quo is an ink stain on American values.
Evangelicals call Trump the chosen one so I guess Trump beat himself?By this time you should be able to recognize that no law need be broken in impeachments cases. The "high crimes' is from England, and the founders used the same words, but America does not have high crimes. There are a number of books on impeachment, and the few I have pretty much agree on the process and history.Yeah, funny how they couldn't cite a single specific law that was broken. This whole thing is ludicrous.ORANGE MAN BEAT THE CHOSEN ONEBy this time you should be able to recognize that no law need be broken in impeachments cases. The "high crimes' is from England, and the founders used the same words, but America does not have high crimes. There are a number of books on impeachment, and the few I have pretty much agree on the process and history.Yeah, funny how they couldn't cite a single specific law that was broken. This whole thing is ludicrous.
No, he was also concerned that US aid to Ukraine had been used by a former VPOTUS - whose name shall remain secret - to fill the pockets of his son.So you say you drank too much of the bright blue Kool-aid again? Have you ever heard of the presumption of innocence? Dems will have to prove in a Senate trail that which you believe to be the truth - emphasis on prove - and they couldn't even do that during their one-sided, KGB-style inquisition.It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.so what is YOUR VERSION of what happened?
Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?
I guess I've got my answer. You're a moron who believes that Trump was ever concerned with corruption in Ukraine.
Ignorance is bliss. So why are you so upset?
