The huge benefits of MORE CO2!!!

"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.
 
"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.

The hairball shows its total ignorance on the subject..


CO2_effects.jpg


"Compared to plants grown at existing carbon dioxide levels, plants “fertilized” by elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide increase their photosynthesis rates (Norby et al. 1999, Kimball et al. 2002, Nowak et al. 2004). In addition, carbon dioxide-fertilized plants respond with increased biomass (dry weight), improved water use efficiency, and an increased tolerance of low light levels. Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) research and other studies have focused on plant response to carbon dioxide levels of 550 parts per million or more, but it seems likely that plants in range and wildland environments are “fertilized” by modern levels (which are about one-third higher than pre-industrial levels of 280 parts per million). The FACE experiments involve exposing plants in the field to elevated carbon dioxide levels."

Source
 
"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.

The hairball shows its total ignorance on the subject..


CO2_effects.jpg


"Compared to plants grown at existing carbon dioxide levels, plants “fertilized” by elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide increase their photosynthesis rates (Norby et al. 1999, Kimball et al. 2002, Nowak et al. 2004). In addition, carbon dioxide-fertilized plants respond with increased biomass (dry weight), improved water use efficiency, and an increased tolerance of low light levels. Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) research and other studies have focused on plant response to carbon dioxide levels of 550 parts per million or more, but it seems likely that plants in range and wildland environments are “fertilized” by modern levels (which are about one-third higher than pre-industrial levels of 280 parts per million). The FACE experiments involve exposing plants in the field to elevated carbon dioxide levels."

Source



Well..........people who dive headlong into any religion almost invariably don't want to know shit about shit about the real world.:coffee:
 
"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.
mamooth, more like maMOOT, as in a moot poster. Plants do not need CO2? It called Photosynthesis, idiot. maMOOT is the one who mocks others, as if it is us who do not embrace, "science". Yet maMoot is ignorant when it comes to the simple.
 
Well..........people who dive headlong into any religion almost invariably don't want to know shit about shit about the real world.:coffee:

I was just doing some cursory looks into the length of time that trees took to expand and grow under higher CO2 concentrations and one study showed the rate of growth vs rate of matter decomposition. It demonstrated that the rise in CO2 was followed by a rise in plant matter which became old and died at the 100-130 year mark setting off the secondary rapid rise in biomass caused CO2. The time line is consistent with our exit out of the LIA and the current natural rise.

The obvious question then becomes is man really to blame for all of the new CO2 since the industrial age starting? This is something the paper states has not been accounted for. To date no one has done the math so no one knows for sure.. So the 2.3 ppm/yr may not be all mans contribution after all.
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
You are here, writing a, "Fairy Tale", yes?
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
You are here, writing a, "Fairy Tale", yes?

Show us your study that refutes him.
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
You are here, writing a, "Fairy Tale", yes?

Show us your study that refutes him.

That makes two who haven't got a clue.. And fail to read the papers-links provided because it might conflict with their religious dogma.
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.

Well if the eco morons would allow underbrush fires to go out naturally instead of pouring water on them this stupidity wouldn't have caused the problems it has. But hey looking at all things as bad without looking at the ecosystem as a whole is what got us in this situation in the first place.

Labeling the building blocks of photosynthesis and all life on this planet as pollution is shear stupidity.

Freaking Moron!
 
"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.
mamooth, more like maMOOT, as in a moot poster. Plants do not need CO2? It called Photosynthesis, idiot. maMOOT is the one who mocks others, as if it is us who do not embrace, "science". Yet maMoot is ignorant when it comes to the simple.

It wasn't until just now that I realized how truly stupid Mamoot is. Now we understand why she does nothing but insult people she disagrees with. What else can she do?
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
You are here, writing a, "Fairy Tale", yes?

Show us your study that refutes him.
A study on Photosynthesis? Well Matthew, if I am posting for your benefit I am sure the Sesame Street site does not contain a Study on Photosynthesis, I could give you a "M", for Moron.

Photosynthesis is the process of converting light energy to chemical energy and storing it in the bonds of sugar. This process occurs in plants and some algae (Kingdom Protista). Plants need only light energy, CO2, and H2O to make sugar

Photosynthesis.gif
 
Billy is now ranting about forest fires for reasons I can't fathom. Elektra has just discovered plants use CO2, and is excited to share that news with everyone else. Bri is wetting himself. Again.

So, how delusional are deniers?

Normal humans, when confronted with the news that the whole planet says they're wrong, will at least re-evaluate their position.

Deniers, when confronted with that news, confidently declare it's obviously because of a secret worldwide conspiracy against them.

You can't make a denier with stupidity alone. After all, most non-smart people don't end up in the denier cult. To be a denier, the stupidity needs to be combined with big streaks of paranoia, narcissism and histrionic personality disorder.
 
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.



opinions are ghey s0n...........your links suck........oh, wait, you never produce any links!!!:2up: Which make your opinions even more ghey.:boobies:


Whats that about "delusional"?????:bye1:
 
Billy is now ranting about forest fires for reasons I can't fathom. Elektra has just discovered plants use CO2, and is excited to share that news with everyone else. Bri is wetting himself. Again.

So, how delusional are deniers?

Normal humans, when confronted with the news that the whole planet says they're wrong, will at least re-evaluate their position.

Deniers, when confronted with that news, confidently declare it's obviously because of a secret worldwide conspiracy against them.

You can't make a denier with stupidity alone. After all, most non-smart people don't end up in the denier cult. To be a denier, the stupidity needs to be combined with big streaks of paranoia, narcissism and histrionic personality disorder.
:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:

Lips are moving and it smells of shit.. :asshole:
 
mamooth said:
Meanwhile, out in the real world, a place deniers never go, the trees and crops aren't growing faster. That would be because, outside of the greenhouse, CO2 isn't the factor limiting growth.

Now, the vines and weeds do tend to grow faster, choking the trees and crops. Well done, deniers! You've screwed over the planet in yet another exciting way! Go on now, give each other some more backslaps over your success in finding a new way to fail.
Click to expand...

___________________________________________________

opinions are ghey s0n...........your links suck........oh, wait, you never produce any links!!!:2up: Which make your opinions even more ghey.:boobies:


Whats that about "delusional"?????:bye1:
 
"CO2 is plant food!" nonsense. Boring and stupid. Standard Skook kook-loser stuff.

Most of the denier cult has stopped even pretending to care about science, and they don't care that everyone knows. The whole point of the cult now is to milk kook losers of money and votes, and they don't need science for that. They only need blind obedience, and people like skook provide it.
And yet here you are like flippin clockwork. So just a question, do you go to sleep with the word denier in your mind every night? I thought so. You use that word more times than you use words that actually have any meaning on this message board. Great honor old dude/ dudette!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top