Bret Baier’s panel touched on a fabulous topic but stopped short of asking the critical question: Exactly what is the difference between Putin’s world of dictators and Taqiyya the Liar’s democracies?
The answer to the question is that there is no difference. Democracy ends in totalitarian government and Putin knows it. Putin has the edge in more ways than one. He realized that a once-free people are losing their freedoms to democracy. If that isn’t a dictatorship I do not know what it is.
The Chicago sewer rat gave Putin the opening he dreamed about during the Cold War. An opportunity to exploit freedom-loving Americans who never had a desire to fight for democracy at home or anywhere else; whereas, dictators do not have to deliver freedom —— order will do. Political reality allows Putin to play the president for the fool well-knowing that defeating a fool is easy when the fool’s policies insist that a benign totalitarian government is possible.
Whether Putin wins, or democracy succeeds for a brief time, the people end up with “tyranny for the common good.”
Those Americans who think their president is a wonderful human being fail to see that Putin is laughing behind the sewer rat’s back because he has the evidence that puts him on the right side of history. So long as our government is pushing democracy the dictators win in the end.
NOTE: Taqiyya the Liar’s democracy is doublespeak for nation-building, while Putin concentrates on building subservience to government. Perhaps the question should be: What is the difference between the people in Putin’s dictatorships and today’s Americans?
Bottom line: Severely limited government is the only way to defeat dictators and democracy, and it has to be done without falling into the hell of nation-building.
Finally, there is not one political movement anywhere in the world advocating limited government, while dictators and democracies continue their march through history. Sad to say, the one and only form of limited government ever tried is being run out of existence by the rabid hounds of democracy.
The answer to the question is that there is no difference. Democracy ends in totalitarian government and Putin knows it. Putin has the edge in more ways than one. He realized that a once-free people are losing their freedoms to democracy. If that isn’t a dictatorship I do not know what it is.
The Chicago sewer rat gave Putin the opening he dreamed about during the Cold War. An opportunity to exploit freedom-loving Americans who never had a desire to fight for democracy at home or anywhere else; whereas, dictators do not have to deliver freedom —— order will do. Political reality allows Putin to play the president for the fool well-knowing that defeating a fool is easy when the fool’s policies insist that a benign totalitarian government is possible.
Whether Putin wins, or democracy succeeds for a brief time, the people end up with “tyranny for the common good.”
The experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived. John Quincy Adams
Those Americans who think their president is a wonderful human being fail to see that Putin is laughing behind the sewer rat’s back because he has the evidence that puts him on the right side of history. So long as our government is pushing democracy the dictators win in the end.
NOTE: Taqiyya the Liar’s democracy is doublespeak for nation-building, while Putin concentrates on building subservience to government. Perhaps the question should be: What is the difference between the people in Putin’s dictatorships and today’s Americans?
Bottom line: Severely limited government is the only way to defeat dictators and democracy, and it has to be done without falling into the hell of nation-building.
Finally, there is not one political movement anywhere in the world advocating limited government, while dictators and democracies continue their march through history. Sad to say, the one and only form of limited government ever tried is being run out of existence by the rabid hounds of democracy.
