toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
When the banking scandal originally came down years back, several top people in the banking industry were prosecuted and went to jail for it. Banks were held accountable and were steered back in line by public embarrassment.
ENTER ERIC HOLDER: Eric Holder now as Attorney General fell back on an idea he had been proffering for years, now buoyed by the Obama Administration and now able to put into law: that some banks were just TOO BIG TO FAIL. That prosecuting them could pose consequences to the economy or world worse than the gains of holding them to the law! So he created his Doctrine that essentially decides that the bigger you are, the greater the crime, the less the Justice Department is likely to prosecute you! So if you commit a large enough crime, the top people in the banking industry are assured that THEY WILL NOT BE CHARGED OR GO TO PRISON.
Now, IF YOU KNEW THAT, wouldn't you be more likely to commit big crimes? Since his doctrine, no large bankers have been charged or convicted. At worst, all you get is a fine, which you do not pay, the bank does, largely written off and passed on to its customers. The bank moves on unscathed, all is kept quiet and the public never sees what is really going on in the bank world.
Just thought you should know. Oh, by the way, Eric has close friends and ties to top people in the banking industry. In his previous job, he actually WORKED FOR THE BIG LAW FIRM WHICH REPRESENTED AND DEFENDED THE BANKS! Like Hillary Clinton, this guy reeks of wrongdoing up to his eyeballs, but no interest in looking into it.
For more info, you can look here:
The ''Holder Doctrine'': Bank ''Settlements'' With No Prosecutions
Insight: Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks
ENTER ERIC HOLDER: Eric Holder now as Attorney General fell back on an idea he had been proffering for years, now buoyed by the Obama Administration and now able to put into law: that some banks were just TOO BIG TO FAIL. That prosecuting them could pose consequences to the economy or world worse than the gains of holding them to the law! So he created his Doctrine that essentially decides that the bigger you are, the greater the crime, the less the Justice Department is likely to prosecute you! So if you commit a large enough crime, the top people in the banking industry are assured that THEY WILL NOT BE CHARGED OR GO TO PRISON.
Now, IF YOU KNEW THAT, wouldn't you be more likely to commit big crimes? Since his doctrine, no large bankers have been charged or convicted. At worst, all you get is a fine, which you do not pay, the bank does, largely written off and passed on to its customers. The bank moves on unscathed, all is kept quiet and the public never sees what is really going on in the bank world.
Just thought you should know. Oh, by the way, Eric has close friends and ties to top people in the banking industry. In his previous job, he actually WORKED FOR THE BIG LAW FIRM WHICH REPRESENTED AND DEFENDED THE BANKS! Like Hillary Clinton, this guy reeks of wrongdoing up to his eyeballs, but no interest in looking into it.
For more info, you can look here:
The ''Holder Doctrine'': Bank ''Settlements'' With No Prosecutions
Insight: Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks
Last edited: