The Heart of the AGW Premise Fails Empirical Review.

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Billy_Bob, Jun 30, 2018.

  1. polarbear
    Offline

    polarbear I eat morons

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,183
    Thanks Received:
    361
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +1,080
    It was just days ago that Wuwei declared that Quantum Physicists have it all wrong, because it is not necessary to match the energy increase with a corresponding energy quantum...he can show them how to do that using quanta of a much lower energy.
    And today according to you and your childish coronal heating theory the Physicists who are exploring where the energy comes from to heat the sun`s corona are wasting their time:
    The Mystery of Coronal Heating | Science Mission Directorate
    and:
    Best Evidence Yet For Coronal Heating Theory
    Best Evidence Yet For Coronal Heating Theory Detected by NASA Sounding Rocket
    Scientists have recently gathered some of the strongest evidence to date to explain what makes the sun's outer atmosphere so much hotter than its surface. The new observations of the small-scale extremely hot temperatures are consistent with only one current theory: something called nanoflares – a constant peppering of impulsive bursts of heating, none of which can be individually detected -- provide the mysterious extra heat.
    According to self opinionated physics "experts" like you and Wuwei they are all idiots who need to get it explained: "coronal heating is a simple case of spontaneous energy transfer from a colder mass to a hotter one". Wowei!!! That ought to nail it. No need for further research, the science has been settled by you and Wuwei.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Wuwei
    Offline

    Wuwei Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,454
    Thanks Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    More ad hominem to all scientists again. You have proven that you can't give proper scrutiny to chemiluminescence which is spontaneous, as defined by physics.

    Have a fun summer and be sure to come back with more idiotic arguments that we can bash down.

    I stand by the second law too. But you don't since you don't understand it.

    All sorts of evidence shows that EM radiation can flow anywhere until it is absorbed. Now you are calling physics metaphysics. You have positively no physics arguments left. Just dogma.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Wuwei
    Offline

    Wuwei Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,454
    Thanks Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    You have it exactly right. However this chilled out hippie thinks that you haven't chilled out yet.

    What the "the cold CMB being able to pass through the atmosphere and then being reflected by the parabolic dish" means is that you disagree with SSDD. That is good.

    Namely: cold radiation has been observed to hit a warmer surface. Scientists agree with that but not SSDD.

    I already told you all that in post #697. Why do you ask the same thing again?
     
  4. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    42,453
    Thanks Received:
    5,359
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +21,637
    And today according to you and your childish coronal heating theory

    I have no theory of coronal heating. I don't care how it is heated. Not a bit.

    I'm exploring SSDD's theory of one way only flow of photons.

    Does a 400K body prevent a 200K body from emitting toward it? SSDD thinks it does.
     
  5. Wuwei
    Offline

    Wuwei Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,454
    Thanks Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    Nope, I never said nor implied that QM is wrong. That's SSDD's dogma. Give me a link.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    42,453
    Thanks Received:
    5,359
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +21,637
    Does a 400K body prevent a 200K body from emitting toward it? SSDD thinks it does.
     
  7. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    42,453
    Thanks Received:
    5,359
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +21,637
    Any luck finding an academic who agrees with your "one-way photons"?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    42,453
    Thanks Received:
    5,359
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +21,637
    Do bodies at equilibrium cease radiating? SSDD thinks so.
     
  9. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    42,453
    Thanks Received:
    5,359
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +21,637
    I think Professor Raeder's betrayal broke poor old SSDD's heart...……
    I wonder if he'll ever post another source?
     
  10. Wuwei
    Offline

    Wuwei Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,454
    Thanks Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    If he wants success, he should avoid sources from universities. He might have better luck if he asked high school science teachers to support his redesign of physics.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page