The Hatred of the Left

[edthecynic]

Dennis Prager

"A related defining characteristic of the left is the ascribing of nefarious motives to conservatives. For the left, a dismissal of conservatives' motives is as important as is dismissal of the conservatives as people. It is close to impossible for almost anyone on the left -- and I mean the elite left, not merely left-wing blogs -- to say "There are good people on both of sides of this issue." From Karl Marx to Frank Rich of The New York Times, this has always been the case.

Why does the left attribute only nefarious motives to those who believe that the Islamic center does not belong near ground zero?

Because leftism holds these beliefs:

1. Those who hold leftist positions are, by definition, better people than their opponents.

2. Those who hold leftist positions have, by definition, pure motives; therefore, the motives of their opponents must be impure."



The Dennis Prager Show

CON$ are projectionists! See the first quote in my sig.

All you have to do is substitute Right for Left in anything a CON$ervative says and you will know everything you need to know about CON$. From Attila the Hun to Dennis Prager, this has always been the case.

 

[007]

And 1/3 of all cons believe the President is a Muslim despite all facts to the contrary.

I wonder where they got that idea...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY]YouTube - Obama Admits He Is A Muslim[/ame]

Nice LEGAL DISCLAIMER in the video, you fucking texas tard.

Texas? I live in Wisconsin ya fucking moron.

 

[cad]

Dennis Prager

"A related defining characteristic of the left is the ascribing of nefarious motives to conservatives. For the left, a dismissal of conservatives' motives is as important as is dismissal of the conservatives as people. It is close to impossible for almost anyone on the left -- and I mean the elite left, not merely left-wing blogs -- to say "There are good people on both of sides of this issue." From Karl Marx to Frank Rich of The New York Times, this has always been the case.

Why does the left attribute only nefarious motives to those who believe that the Islamic center does not belong near ground zero?

Because leftism holds these beliefs:

1. Those who hold leftist positions are, by definition, better people than their opponents.

2. Those who hold leftist positions have, by definition, pure motives; therefore, the motives of their opponents must be impure."



The Dennis Prager Show

CON$ are projectionists! See the first quote in my sig.

All you have to do is substitute Right for Left in anything a CON$ervative says and you will know everything you need to know about CON$. From Attila the Hun to Dennis Prager, this has always been the case.

so prager lied when he pointed out about 10 examples of lefties calling opponents of the mosque bigots, islamaphobes, haters?

that's funny, a lefty accusing conservatives of projecting. ha. ha . ha.

 

[Shogun]

I wonder where they got that idea...

YouTube - Obama Admits He Is A Muslim

Nice LEGAL DISCLAIMER in the video, you fucking texas tard.

Texas? I live in Wisconsin ya fucking moron.

Who knew they had enough gay bars to keep your attention in WISCONSIN?

 

[Nosmo King]

Dennis Prager

"A related defining characteristic of the left is the ascribing of nefarious motives to conservatives. For the left, a dismissal of conservatives' motives is as important as is dismissal of the conservatives as people. It is close to impossible for almost anyone on the left -- and I mean the elite left, not merely left-wing blogs -- to say "There are good people on both of sides of this issue." From Karl Marx to Frank Rich of The New York Times, this has always been the case.

Why does the left attribute only nefarious motives to those who believe that the Islamic center does not belong near ground zero?

Because leftism holds these beliefs:

1. Those who hold leftist positions are, by definition, better people than their opponents.

2. Those who hold leftist positions have, by definition, pure motives; therefore, the motives of their opponents must be impure."



The Dennis Prager Show

Irony is spelled I-R-O-N-Y.

The next time some "pundit" tells you what motivates the opposite side, trust me, he's projecting!

 

[uscitizen]

Pail rider is a cheese head who woulda thunk?

 

[cad]

Dennis Prager

"A related defining characteristic of the left is the ascribing of nefarious motives to conservatives. For the left, a dismissal of conservatives' motives is as important as is dismissal of the conservatives as people. It is close to impossible for almost anyone on the left -- and I mean the elite left, not merely left-wing blogs -- to say "There are good people on both of sides of this issue." From Karl Marx to Frank Rich of The New York Times, this has always been the case.

Why does the left attribute only nefarious motives to those who believe that the Islamic center does not belong near ground zero?

Because leftism holds these beliefs:

1. Those who hold leftist positions are, by definition, better people than their opponents.

2. Those who hold leftist positions have, by definition, pure motives; therefore, the motives of their opponents must be impure."



The Dennis Prager Show

Irony is spelled I-R-O-N-Y.

The next time some "pundit" tells you what motivates the opposite side, trust me, he's projecting!

so you're admitting that all those on the left who accuse opponents of the mosque of bigotry and islamophobia are actually filled with hate themselves?

that's not very progessive of them.

 

[Nosmo King]

Dennis Prager

"A related defining characteristic of the left is the ascribing of nefarious motives to conservatives. For the left, a dismissal of conservatives' motives is as important as is dismissal of the conservatives as people. It is close to impossible for almost anyone on the left -- and I mean the elite left, not merely left-wing blogs -- to say "There are good people on both of sides of this issue." From Karl Marx to Frank Rich of The New York Times, this has always been the case.

Why does the left attribute only nefarious motives to those who believe that the Islamic center does not belong near ground zero?

Because leftism holds these beliefs:

1. Those who hold leftist positions are, by definition, better people than their opponents.

2. Those who hold leftist positions have, by definition, pure motives; therefore, the motives of their opponents must be impure."



The Dennis Prager Show

Irony is spelled I-R-O-N-Y.

The next time some "pundit" tells you what motivates the opposite side, trust me, he's projecting!

so you're admitting that all those on the left who accuse opponents of the mosque of bigotry and islamophobia are actually filled with hate themselves?

that's not very progessive of them.

What are all these words doing in my mouth? I'm not admitting a damn thing! I'm merely pointing out that this and other Conservative "pundits" have one peculiar trait in common. That trait is first telling their audience that Liberals do X. Then, they proceed to do X themselves in defense of their lame, poorly thought out argument.

The next time some Conservative pundit begins by telling you what Liberals think or believe or how they act, you can bet the farm that this same pundit is about to do the exact same thing.

 

[cad]

Irony is spelled I-R-O-N-Y.

The next time some "pundit" tells you what motivates the opposite side, trust me, he's projecting!

so you're admitting that all those on the left who accuse opponents of the mosque of bigotry and islamophobia are actually filled with hate themselves?

that's not very progessive of them.

What are all these words doing in my mouth? I'm not admitting a damn thing! I'm merely pointing out that this and other Conservative "pundits" have one peculiar trait in common. That trait is first telling their audience that Liberals do X. Then, they proceed to do X themselves in defense of their lame, poorly thought out argument.

The next time some Conservative pundit begins by telling you what Liberals think or believe or how they act, you can bet the farm that this same pundit is about to do the exact same thing.

ok, you weren't clear. you said the next time some pundit tells you what motivate the other side, they are projecting. i didn't know you only meant conservative pundits.

so when a left-leaning pundit tells me that i'm filled with hatred because i oppose the mosque, i should just believe him. ok. thanks.

 

[Rinata]

Right wingers hate everything and everybody. I don't see how, if in office, will get anything done.

Moron.

Brilliant!!!! I guess you told them!!!!

 

[California Girl]

Right wingers hate everything and everybody. I don't see how, if in office, will get anything done.

Moron.

Brilliant!!!! I guess you told them!!!!

Oh look.... it's a fat assed moron. We don't see many of those around.

FYI: Contrary to popular belief, fat bottomed girls do not make the rockin' world go round. Eat Less. Stop costing the rest of us money for your weight related health issues.

 

[random3434]

Moron.

Brilliant!!!! I guess you told them!!!!

Oh look.... it's a fat assed moron. We don't see many of those around.

FYI: Contrary to popular belief, fat bottomed girls do not make the rockin' world go round. Eat Less. Stop costing the rest of us money for your weight related health issues.

Wait, I'm confused after this post.

Is this thread about how the left is hateful, or the right is?


Or shall we just call it even?

 

[Sinatra]

Right wingers hate everything and everybody. I don't see how, if in office, will get anything done.

This place is always good for a laugh!!!

 

[Rinata]

Moron.

Brilliant!!!! I guess you told them!!!!

Oh look.... it's a fat assed moron. We don't see many of those around.

FYI: Contrary to popular belief, fat bottomed girls do not make the rockin' world go round. Eat Less. Stop costing the rest of us money for your weight related health issues.

You're so boring!!! Stop looking in the mirror all day then!!! You're obsessed with yourself. Are you mad because I just made fun of you??

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

In my observations, neither the right nor the left has taken the high road when it comes to hatred.

 

[Richard-H]

Since the first election of Ronald Reagan there has been a mass propaganda campiagn against liberal by conservatives that has painted Liberals as the root of all evil. By the mid 1990s most just the word 'liberal' equated with absolute evil in the minds of most conservatives. It didn't have to be wrong - they just had to say that it was 'liberal' as proof.


It was very much like the way the Nazi's painted Jews as the cause of everything that is wrong.

Today, having our President and Congress labeled as 'liberal' is in and of itself reason why conservatives are catagorically against them.

Most of us 'Liberals' may not like most conservative attitudes and poicies, but we take each issue at a time - just labeling something as 'conservative' doesn't mean anything to us.

And most 'Liberals' hold conservative views on at least a couple of issues - not the lock-step thinking espoused by most people who call themselves 'conservatives'.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Since the first election of Ronald Reagan there has been a mass propaganda campiagn against liberal by conservatives that has painted Liberals as the root of all evil. By the mid 1990s most just the word 'liberal' equated with absolute evil in the minds of most conservatives. It didn't have to be wrong - they just had to say that it was 'liberal' as proof.


It was very much like the way the Nazi's painted Jews as the cause of everything that is wrong.

Today, having our President and Congress labeled as 'liberal' is in and of itself reason why conservatives are catagorically against them.

Most of us 'Liberals' may not like most conservative attitudes and poicies, but we take each issue at a time - just labeling something as 'conservative' doesn't mean anything to us.

And most 'Liberals' hold conservative views on at least a couple of issues - not the lock-step thinking espoused by most people who call themselves 'conservatives'.

The people who refer to themselves as liberals these days are not true liberals. They're mostly socialists and Marxists who have hijacked the term and it is they who have made it a dirty word.

 

[edthecynic]

Since the first election of Ronald Reagan there has been a mass propaganda campiagn against liberal by conservatives that has painted Liberals as the root of all evil. By the mid 1990s most just the word 'liberal' equated with absolute evil in the minds of most conservatives. It didn't have to be wrong - they just had to say that it was 'liberal' as proof.


It was very much like the way the Nazi's painted Jews as the cause of everything that is wrong.

Today, having our President and Congress labeled as 'liberal' is in and of itself reason why conservatives are catagorically against them.

Most of us 'Liberals' may not like most conservative attitudes and poicies, but we take each issue at a time - just labeling something as 'conservative' doesn't mean anything to us.

And most 'Liberals' hold conservative views on at least a couple of issues - not the lock-step thinking espoused by most people who call themselves 'conservatives'.

The people who refer to themselves as liberals these days are not true liberals. They're mostly socialists and Marxists who have hijacked the term and it is they who have made it a dirty word.

The people who refer to themselves as CON$ervatives these days are not true CON$ervatives. They're mostly Fascists who have hijacked the term and it is they who have made CON$ervatism a dirty word.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The people who refer to themselves as CON$ervatives these days are not true CON$ervatives. They're mostly Fascists who have hijacked the term and it is they who have made CON$ervatism a dirty word.

The far right has shown some fascist tendencies and so has the far left. Conservatives claim to support the concept of limited government and personal freedom, but in practice they do not. I would disagree with you, however, in your claim that they are not true conservatives, because conservatism tends to be apprehensive towards cultural change and I think that describes modern conservatives quite accurately.

 

[edthecynic]

The people who refer to themselves as CON$ervatives these days are not true CON$ervatives. They're mostly Fascists who have hijacked the term and it is they who have made CON$ervatism a dirty word.

The far right has shown some fascist tendencies and so has the far left. Conservatives claim to support the concept of limited government and personal freedom, but in practice they do not. I would disagree with you, however, in your claim that they are not true conservatives, because conservatism tends to be apprehensive towards cultural change and I think that describes modern conservatives quite accurately.

A true conservative would be someone like William F Buckley, not hate mongers like LimpTard and HanNITWITy.