The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs

[MAGAman]

But rural population is in decline. Crime is minimal in rural areas because most people don't live there, not because of gun ownership.

Crime is down everywhere except Democrat Shitholes.

You don't know what you're talking about.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ownership and use of firearms among civilians should be rare and carefully monitored and reduced to just Shotguns and Air Rifles. A civilian does not need anything more than a shotgun or Air Rifle.

A person with a shotgun is more than capable of murdering as many if not more people than a person with a handgun or 'assault weapon' - what rational argument is there for your plan to ban possession of those weapons, but allow shotguns?

Shotguns require you to reload after every two shots and the lethal range is rather short.

Repeating your statement of ignorance an/or dishonesty does not make it any less ignorant and/or dishonest - nor does it meaningfully address the question.
So, I'll ask again:
A person with a shotgun is more than capable of murdering as many, if not more, people than a person with a handgun or 'assault weapon' - what rational argument is there for your plan to ban possession of those weapons, but allow shotguns?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Civilians don't need a shotgun that can be loaded with 6 shells. Two is more than enough.

Prove your statement true.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Ownership and use of firearms among civilians should be rare and carefully monitored and reduced to just Shotguns and Air Rifles. A civilian does not need anything more than a shotgun or Air Rifle.

A person with a shotgun is more than capable of murdering as many if not more people than a person with a handgun or 'assault weapon' - what rational argument is there for your plan to ban possession of those weapons, but allow shotguns?

Shotguns require you to reload after every two shots and the lethal range is rather short.

Of the 27 most deadly mass shootings in the United States, there were only six where a shotgun was brought to the scene by the shooter. Plus, even in those six instances, most of the casualties were caused by other firearms.

The Virginia Tech shooter showed the damage of a handgun. With 15 round clips, he was able to kill 30 people and injure 26 others in less than 10 minutes. Had only been armed with a shotgun, he likely would have been disarmed the during the reloading process preventing the deaths of most people that happened.

This was before checks and balances were instilled in the Universities and Colleges. Today, if the same shooter were to decide to go for it, he may very well be stopped at the entrance. But if he does get past that, he might bag 2 or 3 before the lockdown happens and he ends up running around empty building and corridors. Plus, the Cops will come in very quickly since the Cops now have special reaction forces for Mass Shooters. They are no more than 90 seconds away. Unlike back then where cops only had their side arms, all cops now have a shotgun in a rack in the front seat and an AR in the trunk. There was a shooting a few years ago in LA that the shooters had an AR and an AK and the cops lost a few of their buddies before they finally brought them down. AFter that, the cops in inner cities started arming with ARs.

So everyone can stop this misinformation anytime now. Then was then and now is now.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Ownership and use of firearms among civilians should be rare and carefully monitored and reduced to just Shotguns and Air Rifles. A civilian does not need anything more than a shotgun or Air Rifle.

A person with a shotgun is more than capable of murdering as many if not more people than a person with a handgun or 'assault weapon' - what rational argument is there for your plan to ban possession of those weapons, but allow shotguns?

Shotguns require you to reload after every two shots and the lethal range is rather short.

Of the 27 most deadly mass shootings in the United States, there were only six where a shotgun was brought to the scene by the shooter. Plus, even in those six instances, most of the casualties were caused by other firearms.

The Virginia Tech shooter showed the damage of a handgun. With 15 round clips, he was able to kill 30 people and injure 26 others in less than 10 minutes. Had only been armed with a shotgun, he likely would have been disarmed the during the reloading process preventing the deaths of most people that happened.

Ignorance prevails in this post. Dude a pump shotgun can load as many as 6 shells and if you add an extension depending on the model three more shells. and it MAGAZINE not CLIP.

Well, then its not a shotgun that will be allowed under my gun control plan. Civilians don't need a shotgun that can be loaded with 6 shells. Two is more than enough. Were talking about civilians here, not the military or police force. Civilians don't need anything more than a shotgun(two shells loaded max) or an Air Rifle.

Civilians have 5 shot tubes with one in the barrel.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Bullshit! In my state, open carry has been the law for many years. Now, concealed carry is perfectly legal without a CCDW permit!

You'd piss yourself walking into a Walmart here! That is why no one shoots up a Walmart in this state! They don't like people shooting back!

What state do you live in?

Because of people like you, I live in the great state of confusion. How is it possible that someone so stupid can operate a computer?

I live in KY which recently passed Constitutional concealed carry. You could walk into a Walmart intending to shoot up the place and be outnumbered 300 to 1!

300 civilians with guns in a Walmart. What could go wrong? They all pull out their weapons when they hear the shots. They see someone else with a weapon and think its the mass shooter and shoot them. You could have a dozen of these cases with that many people. The mass shooter will still kill a few before he gets shot because he has the initiative. You'll still have over 20 people dead, half of them killed by the armed civilians thinking their target was the mass shooter.

Which is why citizens have the right to carry concealed firearms for the purpose of lawful self-defense – not to act in the capacity of law enforcement, or to deter crime, or to stop a mass shooting incident.

Citizens will rarely ever need a concealed firearm for their own self-defense. The answer from other countries like Japan and the United Kingdom is clear. Less firearms among the population leads to less firearm deaths among the population.

The issue isn’t how often a citizen might use a firearm for self-defense – in fact, how often is irrelevant.

At issue is government seeking to regulate and restrict a fundamental right: the right to self-defense and the right to possess a handgun pursuant to self-defense – however rare that might be.

And this doesn’t mean we’re ‘helpless’ to do anything about gun crime and violence; it means that we must find other ways to address the problem that don’t involve the regulation and restriction of firearms inconsistent with Second Amendment jurisprudence – such as the regulations and restrictions you propose.

 

[JWBooth]

The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs

Laws repealing:
National Firearms Act (1934)
Federal Firearms Act of 1938
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
Gun Control Act of 1968
Firearm Owners Protection Act (1986)
Undetectable Firearms Act (1988)
Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990)