The gruesome history of left-wing scientific fakery

[deanrd]

You have no right to complain about fetus mistreatment when you want to cut food stamps and school lunches for poor children and take away their healthcare, cut education and basically ruin their lives. Worse is when the right wing laughs at those less fortunate.

 

[danielpalos]

Just a management problem. The right wing prefers to get their management from "Hostess".

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 140097

California, one of the most progressive states,...

California Bans Sterilization of Female Inmates Without Consent - NBC News

...sterilized without consent around 150 female inmates between 2005 to 2011.

*****SMILE*****

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics

"California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.

In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which were on women. The state's two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.

Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense."

 

[westwall]

So you think the green house effect is something developed by leftist...

Lol

You're a fucking idiot.

These science-ignorant politicos love simplicity and black/white comparisons such as "leftists vs rightists".

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

 

[PK1]

So you think the green house effect is something developed by leftist...

Lol

You're a fucking idiot.

These science-ignorant politicos love simplicity and black/white comparisons such as "leftists vs rightists".

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

If you want it to be simple ("easy button"), then that reflects on your limited intellect.
Climatologists have presented evidence for their AGW claims, and if you simplify them into a single generalized bucket, then it's clear you don't understand their science field, or scientific methodologies.

 

[westwall]

So you think the green house effect is something developed by leftist...

Lol

You're a fucking idiot.

These science-ignorant politicos love simplicity and black/white comparisons such as "leftists vs rightists".

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

If you want it to be simple ("easy button"), then that reflects on your limited intellect.
Climatologists have presented evidence for their AGW claims, and if you simplify them into a single generalized bucket, then it's clear you don't understand their science field, or scientific methodologies.

No, they haven't. they have presented you with COMPUTER models. Models are NOT data. They are relying on the fact that millenials truly know very, very little about science.

 

[SixFoot]

These science-ignorant politicos love simplicity and black/white comparisons such as "leftists vs rightists".

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

If you want it to be simple ("easy button"), then that reflects on your limited intellect.
Climatologists have presented evidence for their AGW claims, and if you simplify them into a single generalized bucket, then it's clear you don't understand their science field, or scientific methodologies.

No, they haven't. they have presented you with COMPUTER models. Models are NOT data. They are relying on the fact that millenials truly know very, very little about science.

 

[PK1]

These science-ignorant politicos love simplicity and black/white comparisons such as "leftists vs rightists".

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

If you want it to be simple ("easy button"), then that reflects on your limited intellect.
Climatologists have presented evidence for their AGW claims, and if you simplify them into a single generalized bucket, then it's clear you don't understand their science field, or scientific methodologies.

No, they haven't. they have presented you with COMPUTER models. Models are NOT data. They are relying on the fact that millenials truly know very, very little about science.

Are you lumping yourself into your "millenial" bucket?
Scientific climate models that are published in peer-reviewed journals are based on DATA.
You can dispute the data or their methodology or interpretation ... but you need to understand them first.
LOL!

 

[fncceo]

And you would go back to the fucking dark age.

Hell, yea!

 

[Mushroom]

And there you, with the faked quotes.

FALSE: Margaret Sanger Decries 'Human Weeds'

And did you read the rest of that snippet, which gives us an actual quote by her?

It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.

Is that really any better? So you are denying the modified quote, but can you deny the impact of her actual quote?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Hitler was a devout Christian yet you will never see this fact getting mentioned. This I find very strange.

Because it's a lie

 

[westwall]

Speaking of simpletons. Who coined the phrase "the SCIENCE IS SETTLED!". Best be looking in the mirror when you hurl those invectives, junior.

Hey Junior, please enlighten us with the "science" that is referred to by the person who made that claim. Let's not be simplistic & generalize to all scientists & the overall field of research.

Climatologists and their claim about AGW. About as simplistic a view of the world as a simpleton could make.

If you want it to be simple ("easy button"), then that reflects on your limited intellect.
Climatologists have presented evidence for their AGW claims, and if you simplify them into a single generalized bucket, then it's clear you don't understand their science field, or scientific methodologies.

No, they haven't. they have presented you with COMPUTER models. Models are NOT data. They are relying on the fact that millenials truly know very, very little about science.

Are you lumping yourself into your "millenial" bucket?
Scientific climate models that are published in peer-reviewed journals are based on DATA.
You can dispute the data or their methodology or interpretation ... but you need to understand them first.
LOL!

Some of them use falsified "data". Yes, that is true. But the computer model results ARE NOT DATA. Learn what data is, then come back to the party.