The greatest threat to freedom is on campus

Talking Campus Free Speech on Capitol Hill
A House hearing last week may not change the world, but it may be a start.

August 1, 2017
Bruce Bawer

xdf_1.jpg


On July 27, two House subcommittees held a joint hearing on “Challenges to Freedom of Speech on College Campuses.” Congressman James Raskin (D-MD) called it “the most fascinating hearing” he's attended during his his six months in office. It was fascinating, for what it brought out both about the alarming reality of American higher education today and about the determination of some people on the left to deny or obscure that reality.

That determination was on display from the outset. Val Demings (D-FL), a black woman and former police chief of Jacksonville, professed to recognize the problem on U.S. campuses and to be a strong defender of the First Amendment. But she was quick to insist that the real “clear and present danger” on campuses doesn't involve the shutting down of “high-profile speakers like Ann Coulter” but “the increase in white supremacist hate groups.” She recounted a recent incident at American University in Washington, D.C., where somebody hung bananas on nooses from trees, apparently a racist response to the election of a female black student, Taylor Dumpson, as student-government president. Dumpson, who sat in the audience at the hearing, had also been the target of “cyberbullying” that Demings characterized as “unprotected hate speech.” The real problem on campuses, Deming concluded, is “criminal acts being wrapped in banners of free speech.”

...

At its best, the hearing provided an impressive display of at least some House members engaged in intelligent, informed exchange about an urgent social issue. Whether the hearing will make any difference is another question. The mainstream media ignored it, and there was little mention by the participating lawmakers of any substantive action that might be taken to rescue free speech at colleges – most of which, after all, receive federal funds. But a hearing is better than nothing. And who knows? It might just be a start.

Talking Campus Free Speech on Capitol Hill
 
YALE TALIBAN CENSORS "CONTROVERSIAL" STATUE
August 10, 2017

Daniel Greenfield
talibanyale.jpg



One of the bizarre post 9/11 touchstones came when the Taliban envoy was found to be studying at Yale.

...

He's an Islamist. They're at the top of the intersectional dog pile. Being the most oppressive makes you the most oppressed.

But it seems as if Taliban Man and Allah at Yale taught the school more than it taught him. As Yale is starting to go after statues. And for once we aren't talking about the Confederacy. As Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit notes.

...

The issue in question isn't even the usual excuse that the Intersectional Taliban have been using to pull down statues. It's not racism. It's that guns are bad.

And so they've moved from pulling down statues for racism, to censoring them for projecting inappropriate virtues like gun ownership. What's next? Any smoking statues? Statues reading books by white male authors? Too many statues of white men? The possibilities are endless.

The Taliban are here.

Yale Taliban Censors "Controversial" Statue
 

Forum List

Back
Top