The Great Lie


(A) "The world" doesn't care about the PPACA, as it only applies to Americans
(B) The article is dated January 3, 2014, almost two years ago, and only three days into the start of full implementation of the PPACA

You'll have to do better.
I think America needs to do better

Then make your case instead of copy-and-pasting a two-year-old FOX headline.
 

(A) "The world" doesn't care about the PPACA, as it only applies to Americans
(B) The article is dated January 3, 2014, almost two years ago, and only three days into the start of full implementation of the PPACA

You'll have to do better.
I think America needs to do better

Then make your case instead of copy-and-pasting a two-year-old FOX headline.
Don't elect idiodents
 

(A) "The world" doesn't care about the PPACA, as it only applies to Americans
(B) The article is dated January 3, 2014, almost two years ago, and only three days into the start of full implementation of the PPACA

You'll have to do better.
I think America needs to do better

Then make your case instead of copy-and-pasting a two-year-old FOX headline.
Don't elect idiodents

Yeah, okay. Typical.

This thread's going to be closed because you didn't include any original content in the OP, anyway.
 
To quote President Kennedy in another context (defending his Medicare plan in 1962):

I understand that there is going to be a program this week against this bill, in which an English physician is going to come and talk about how bad their plans are. It may be, but he ought to talk about it in England, because his plans--because his plans and what they do in England are entirely different.

Why anyone thinks critiques of the NHS are relevant to any discussion Americans are having about health care escapes me, but it's certainly not a new phenomenon--folks have been throwing out that red herring for more than 50 years.
 
To quote President Kennedy in another context (defending his Medicare plan in 1962):

I understand that there is going to be a program this week against this bill, in which an English physician is going to come and talk about how bad their plans are. It may be, but he ought to talk about it in England, because his plans--because his plans and what they do in England are entirely different.

Why anyone thinks critiques of the NHS are relevant to any discussion Americans are having about health care escapes me, but it's certainly not a new phenomenon--folks have been throwing out that red herring for more than 50 years.

The underlying problem is lack of information. Those who have been dependent on someone else to provide them with health insurance (and do their paperwork for them) have a childlike understanding (or lack of understanding) of how health insurance works.

Since January '14, they've had to learn...or just continue chanting the Talking Points and pouting.
 

(A) "The world" doesn't care about the PPACA, as it only applies to Americans
(B) The article is dated January 3, 2014, almost two years ago, and only three days into the start of full implementation of the PPACA

You'll have to do better.
I think America needs to do better

Then make your case instead of copy-and-pasting a two-year-old FOX headline.

the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years.
 
Why anyone thinks critiques of the NHS are relevant to any discussion Americans are having about health care escapes me, but it's certainly not a new phenomenon--folks have been throwing out that red herring for more than 50 years.

of course thats 100% stupid and liberal, NHS is single payer communism which is exactly why many libturds wanted PPA. It represented a gaint govt take over on route to single payer which is what out lib commies ultimately want! THe Obama in Obamacare is openly for single payer!!! What planet have you been on??
 
the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years.

Link?

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.
 
To quote President Kennedy in another context (defending his Medicare plan in 1962):

I understand that there is going to be a program this week against this bill, in which an English physician is going to come and talk about how bad their plans are. It may be, but he ought to talk about it in England, because his plans--because his plans and what they do in England are entirely different.

Why anyone thinks critiques of the NHS are relevant to any discussion Americans are having about health care escapes me, but it's certainly not a new phenomenon--folks have been throwing out that red herring for more than 50 years.
It's because opposition to the ACA is partisan, not base on facts or the truth – where false comparison fallacies, red herring fallacies, and lies are the order of the day.
 
the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years.

Link?

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!
 
It's because opposition to the ACA is partisan, not base on facts or the truth – where false comparison fallacies, red herring fallacies, and lies are the order of the day.

yes its partisan because Republicans are partisans against socialism which slowly starved 120 million to death.
 
the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years.

Link?

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China

You're the only one mentioning China. Are you a stupid liberal? You're obviously at least one of those things.
 
the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years.

Link?

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China

You're the only one mentioning China. Are you a stupid liberal? You're obviously at least one of those things.
stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how poor people were in Red China
 

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China

You're the only one mentioning China. Are you a stupid liberal? You're obviously at least one of those things.
stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how poor people were in Red China

Confirmed that you consider yourself a stupid liberal, since you're the only one repeatedly mentioning China.

Post it again.
 
stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how cheap things are now under Republican capitalism!!

I'm asking you to prove your claim that "the case is that capitalism would lower prices to 20% of what they are now and increase our life expectancy by 10-20 years."

If you're impotent, just say so.

stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China

You're the only one mentioning China. Are you a stupid liberal? You're obviously at least one of those things.
stupid liberal wants a link to show how expensive things were in Red China and how poor people were in Red China

Confirmed that you consider yourself a stupid liberal, since you're the only one repeatedly mentioning China.

Post it again.

Ben Carson said Obamacare was worst thing since slavery because it features Red Chinese like control of industry that destroys incentives to work efficiently, raises prices, and ultimately impoverishes and kills people.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top