The GOP and women's rights.

Right up there with their government issued Viagra.

Oh wait! It's NOT government issued? It's paid for by the insurance they pay for?

Glad we could get that straight.
 
Nobody, but NOBODY should be in charge of reproductive rights other than each individual.

Sure...so says the left.....but whose looking out for the little guy who'se gonna be butchered because Sandra didn't get her birth control paid for ?
 
You seem to be physically incapable of sticking to the subject at hand, which is not abortion by the way.

Nice dodge.....

I'll take that to mean you don't have the courage to answer the questions: which is that a great many of your non-forgetting women don't agree with your murderous viewpoint.

You seemed to not mind raising the point that it wasn't my business (reproductive rights.....a buzzword for abortion....or do you need a license to screw ?)
 
You seem to be physically incapable of sticking to the subject at hand, which is not abortion by the way.

Nice dodge.....

I'll take that to mean you don't have the courage to answer the questions: which is that a great many of your non-forgetting women don't agree with your murderous viewpoint.

You seemed to not mind raising the point that it wasn't my business (reproductive rights.....a buzzword for abortion....or do you need a license to screw ?)

Silly men. No, it's not a buzzword for abortion. Laws saying you have to tell your employer if the pill is for medical or sexual reasons? That makes sense to you?
 
You seem to be physically incapable of sticking to the subject at hand, which is not abortion by the way.

Nice dodge.....

I'll take that to mean you don't have the courage to answer the questions: which is that a great many of your non-forgetting women don't agree with your murderous viewpoint.

You seemed to not mind raising the point that it wasn't my business (reproductive rights.....a buzzword for abortion....or do you need a license to screw ?)

Silly men. No, it's not a buzzword for abortion.

A pill is not a reproductive right.

And yes it is a buzzword for abortion.
 
Laws saying you have to tell your employer if the pill is for medical or sexual reasons? That makes sense to you?

Absolutely not.

What they are thinking or if they are thinking is in question.

What if the employer does not want to ask. I can't see myself asking some of the twenty somethings in our office that question.....

More regulations.....

Is that the GOP ?

Now, I realize that it associate with the woman asking for birth control. In my mind they should just not offer it and call it a day.
 
Nice dodge.....

I'll take that to mean you don't have the courage to answer the questions: which is that a great many of your non-forgetting women don't agree with your murderous viewpoint.

You seemed to not mind raising the point that it wasn't my business (reproductive rights.....a buzzword for abortion....or do you need a license to screw ?)

Silly men. No, it's not a buzzword for abortion.

A pill is not a reproductive right.

And yes it is a buzzword for abortion.

No, it's not.

The pill makes reproductive CHOICE possible.
 
Silly men. No, it's not a buzzword for abortion.

A pill is not a reproductive right.

And yes it is a buzzword for abortion.

No, it's not.

The pill makes reproductive CHOICE possible.

No pill I know gets you pregnant.

So it can only work in the negative.

And not having sex is the same thing.

Society is not responsible to prevent the consequences of your actions.
 
Are the Republicans/conservatives conducting a legislative "war on women"? You Bet'cha!


Republican "War On Women" Is Not A Left-Wing Invention | Media Matters for America

100% bull shit.

Name one right that the GOP is taking from women.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

1) Republicans not only want to reduce women's access to abortion care, they're actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven't yet. Shocker.

2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to "accuser." But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain "victims."

3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)

4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.

5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids' preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.

8) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.

9) Congress just voted for a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.

10) And if that wasn't enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can't make this stuff up).


Stop the War on Women: WHAT'S AT STAKE
 
Last edited:
Are the Republicans/conservatives conducting a legislative "war on women"? You Bet'cha!


Republican "War On Women" Is Not A Left-Wing Invention | Media Matters for America

100% bull shit.

Name one right that the GOP is taking from women.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

1) Republicans not only want to reduce women's access to abortion care, they're actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven't yet. Shocker.

Would need before data before this claim ins meaningful. Of course they want to stop abortions.

Redefine Rape ? So what does that mean. Not always a bad thing........

[
2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to "accuser." But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain "victims."

I don't get freaked out over Jeremiah Wright. And I really don't care to worry about some whackjob....if your claim presents the whole story. It won't happen.

[
3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)

If this is implied...you are a moron for making such a claim.

I'll hold judgement....present the facts please.

[
4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.

We are blind to people. We want to cut aid to everyone.

So what ?

[
5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

Credibility is sinking fast. Something might play out that way....but I'd really like to see the bill that says "You don't have to save a womans life." :doubt:

[6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids' preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

That is Maryland's problem. I love states powers.

Maryland is a blue state.....are you worried. They love welfare there.

[7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.

Can't get rid of it fast enough...did you see Stossels piece on how Head Start is a failure ?

[8) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.

[9) Congress just voted for a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.
Republicans obviously don't trust them. Never have.

They are a lightning rod and have been involved in several scandals.

[10) And if that wasn't enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can't make this stuff up).

The GOP does not believe in government run social programs.

What else is new ?

In short, a few zany GOPers and this is a war on women.

You can and do make that up.
 
I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

1) Republicans not only want to reduce women's access to abortion care, they're actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven't yet. Shocker.

No onje has a right to an abortion.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to "accuser." But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain "victims."

Nothing to do with rights.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)

(if this is even true)Not an attempt to limit a woman's rights. Unless you think that only women doctors perform abortions.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.

No one has a right to free stuff from the taxpayers.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

If this is true, and I doubt it, you might have something.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids' preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

Not even close to a right for women.

I'll give you the Top 10. And before you brainlessly dismiss this list simply because of the source, why don't you use your brain and try to refute some of these points?

Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the GOP's War on Women

7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.

8) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.

9) Congress just voted for a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.

10) And if that wasn't enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can't make this stuff up).

Again, no one has a right to recieve free stuff from the government.

Pretty piss poor attempt there.
 
When the source is a confirmed shameless propagandist, it can be dismissed out of hand regardless of the alleged content.

Tell us how you'd react to something posted at World Nut Daily, hmmmmmm?

I have and continued to discuss the CONTENT of any post put forth by anyone on these threads in the last 2 years.

You and your compadres have neither the guts, brains or honesty to do the same, as you demonstrate with each dodge and smokescreen you put forth here.

Grow a pair, my Odd little man, and discuss the CONTENT of my links, using facts and logic to prove me/it wrong. IF what you assert is true, then what I request should be a snap. I'll wait.

There's a way around that. Usually such sites will link to the original article, which most would find more palatable.

And there lies the rub, for our resident neocon/teabagger blowhards DO NOT READ THE MATERIAL OFFERED. They just see the source and then squawk the mantras Drudge and Limbaugh feed them.
 
Content schmontent....Propaganda from unabashed propagandists is still propaganda.

You'd believe Goebbels if he had a (D) by his name.

And as we can see, folks....Oddball cannot deal with any FACTS that dispute/disprove his neocon/teabagger vision of the world. So unless he's willing to discuss the actual content of my link or my statement in the OP, Oddball just becomes an attention seeking crank who is no longer worth responding to here.

God help the mother/wife/daughter/girl friend of men like Oddball who support the dreck listed in the linked article.
I'm not a neocon, dickweed....And your content is still from unabashed socialist propagandist hacks.

Deal with it, pink boy.

See folks, our Oddball is STILL dodging a rational discussion of the material contained in my link. Any fool can spew labels....PROVING IT with logical and fact based debate is quite another story...and Oddball cannot/will not meet that simple standard.

And if that weren't pathetic enough, Oddball now denies he's a neocon....a laughable bluff given that his rhetoric can be found on any broadcast of Hannity/Limbaugh/Levine/O'Reilly/Savage/Beck or in the yellow sheets of the WND/NewsBusters/Washington Times or in the rantings of Maulkin/Crowley/Coulter/Krauthammer/Kristol.

Quite the intellectual coward, our Oddball. God help the woman who's married to him, or his daughter or sister, if Oddball dearly loves what's going on in Arizona recently.
 

Forum List

Back
Top