The firing of corrupt Peter Strzok will quickly lead to the unraveling of the entire Muller probe

[ColonelAngus]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

 

[Skylar]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

Seems a little unlikely.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Good luck with that.

 

[deanrd]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

How many months ago was it Mueller kicked PS off the investigation ?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

 

[bodecea]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

Is this another one of those "Any day now" scenarios like the H. Clinton Special Counsel predicted to be imminent over a year ago? Ruh Roooooh!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

Is this another one of those "Any day now" scenarios like the H. Clinton Special Counsel predicted to be imminent over a year ago? Ruh Roooooh!

Or like Trump would be impeached by Christmas, 2017...I know....right?

 

[Skylar]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

Actually the responses were 'seems unlikely' and 'good luck with that'.

Your assertion doesn't make much sense.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

Actually the responses were 'seems unlikely' and 'good luck with that'.

Your assertion doesn't make much sense.

Why don’t you lay out the folly of my logic.

Specifically, point by point, why I am wrong.

Use specific proper names and specific reasons.

 

[Skylar]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

Actually the responses were 'seems unlikely' and 'good luck with that'.

Your assertion doesn't make much sense.

Why don’t you lay out the folly of my logic.

Specifically, point by point, why I am wrong.

Use specific proper names and specific reasons.

Why don't you factually establish that your claim is right. For example, explain why a man who hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation in over a year would have any significant effect on it today.

As your claim makes no sense. Change that with evidence and reason. Or admit you can't.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

Actually the responses were 'seems unlikely' and 'good luck with that'.

Your assertion doesn't make much sense.

Why don’t you lay out the folly of my logic.

Specifically, point by point, why I am wrong.

Use specific proper names and specific reasons.

Why don't you factually establish that your claim is right. For example, explain why a man who hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation in over a year would have any significant effect on it today.

As your claim makes no sense. Change that with evidence and reason. Or admit you can't.

Well, you tried.

I will try again.

He opened the Trump probe on July 31, 2016 based on hearsay from an Australian diplomat via the U.S. embassy in London. The diplomat said a Teump volunteer, George Papadopoulos, told him a Russian-connected professor heard that Moscow owned “thousands” of Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

Strzok’s FBI team embraced an unverified dossier written by ex-British spy Christopher Steele. Mr. Steele was paid by Fusion GPS with money from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party. The FBI used the dossier to convince a court to approve a wiretap on campaign volunteer Carter Page. The bureau also relied on the dossier to guide the investigation. The bureau told a House committee last year it had still not confirmed Mr. Steele’s Kremlin-sourced charges.

Strzok participated in a partisan flow of anti/Trump information that went from the Clinton opposite research firm, Fusion GPS, to Associated Attorney General Bruce Ohr to the FBI agent. Mr. Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked at Fusion as a Russia expert.

The firing of Peter Strzok for cause opens for questioning and reexamining all interviews and data he collected.

Think of it like when a crooked cop gets fired. Often, every case that cop was involved with gets re-examined.

You follow me now?

 

[MarcATL]

Is this another one of those "Any day now" scenarios like the H. Clinton Special Counsel predicted to be imminent over a year ago? Ruh Roooooh!

You know it!

#LOLGOP

 

[Skylar]

Liberal response: “No! You are!”

Quality retorts. Thanks for playing.

Actually the responses were 'seems unlikely' and 'good luck with that'.

Your assertion doesn't make much sense.

Why don’t you lay out the folly of my logic.

Specifically, point by point, why I am wrong.

Use specific proper names and specific reasons.

Why don't you factually establish that your claim is right. For example, explain why a man who hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation in over a year would have any significant effect on it today.

As your claim makes no sense. Change that with evidence and reason. Or admit you can't.

Well, you tried.

I will try again.

He opened the Trump probe on July 31, 2016 based on hearsay from an Australian diplomat via the U.S. embassy in London. The diplomat said a Teump volunteer, George Papadopoulos, told him a Russian-connected professor heard that Moscow owned “thousands” of Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

Says who?

Your premise is that the Steele dossier is the sole basis of the investigation. Prove it. You're also concluding that Mueller hasn't found any evidence of criminal activity as part of his investigation....which of course would justify the investigation's existence.

The numerous guilty pleas and indictments would contradict your assumptions as well.

And of course, Strzok hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation for a *year*. Making your premise beyond unlikely. You're offering unsupported assumption as the basis of unsupported assumption, to back a ridiculous premise.

Good luck with that.

 

[LoneLaugher]

How many instances of having one's wishful thinking shot down by actual events does it take to get some people to stop
announcing their wishful thoughts on here?

 

[MarcATL]

Well, you tried.

I will try again.

He opened the Trump probe on July 31, 2016 based on hearsay from an Australian diplomat via the U.S. embassy in London. The diplomat said a Teump volunteer, George Papadopoulos, told him a Russian-connected professor heard that Moscow owned “thousands” of Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

Says who?

Your premise is that the Steele dossier is the sole basis of the investigation. Prove it. You're also concluding that Mueller hasn't found any evidence of criminal activity as part of his investigation....which of course would justify the investigation's existence.

The numerous guilty pleas and indictments would contradict your assumptions as well.

And of course, Strzok hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation for a *year*. Making your premise beyond unlikely. You're offering unsupported assumption as the basis of unsupported assumption, to back a ridiculous premise.

Good luck with that. [/QUOTE]That's how they roll...

 

[easyt65]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?

STRZOK.



WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?

STRZOK

 

[Skylar]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?

STRZOK.



WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?

STRZOK

Who can't back the absurd premise that the Steele Dossier was the sole basis of the Mueller investigation:

You.

Who can't back the absurd premise that Mueller hasn't found evidence of criminal activity as part of his investigation:

You.

Who is ignoring the fact that Strzok hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation for over a year.

You.

Good luck with that.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?

STRZOK.



WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?

STRZOK

No! You are!!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Libs whistling past the graveyard.

At least we know they would have no problem with an FBI agent sending anti Obama texts while investigating Obama.

He can have his opinions and still investigate without bias.... right?

All day, every day... you guys would have no issues with it.

 

[easyt65]

Mueller gets 'protective order' on George Papadopoulos evidence

Oh shit!! Who interviewed Pop for the FBI?

Strzok.

Also, Some members of the media have the unredacted FISA warrant. They know this is bullshit and it’s going to be a pleasure to watch the house of cards tumble down.

Wolfe’s Indictment, Media Leaks & the Page FISA Application

Get your popcorn.

WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AND BROKE FBI PROTOCOL / STANDARDS BY NOT PUTTING HER UNDER OATH AND NOT RECORDING THE INTERVIEW?

STRZOK.



WHO PERSONALLY MODIFIED THE FBI'S FINAL REPORT ON THE HILLARY INVESTIGATION, MODIFYING THE VERBIAGE IN THE REPORT TO PROTECT HILLARY FROM INDICTMENT?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED HILLARY AIDES MILLS AND ABEDIN AND PROTECTED THEM FROM INDICTMENT FOR PERJURY WHEN THE RECORDS SHOW THEY LIED ABOYUT KNOWING ABOUT HILARY'S SERVER?

STRZOK



WHO INTERVIEWED FLYNN AND INDICTED HIM FOR PERJURY DESPITE COMEY TESTIFYING THAT HIS FBI AGENTS BELIEVED FLYNN DID NOT LIE WHEN INTERVIEWED?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING THE EXISTENCE OF A SECRET SOCIETY THAT HAD ALREADY MET TO DISCUSS STOPPING TRUMP FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT?

STRZOK




WHO SENT TEXT MESSAGES REVEALING DEPUTY DIRECTOR ANDREW McCABE HAVIG AN 'INSURANCE POLITY' TO USE AGAINST TRUMP, REVEALING THE CONSPIRACTY WITHIN THE FBI BY DECLARING 'WE WILL STOP HIM'?

STRZOK

Who can't back the absurd premise that the Steele Dossier was the sole basis of the Mueller investigation:

You.

Who can't back the absurd premise that Mueller hasn't found evidence of criminal activity as part of his investigation:

You.

Who is ignoring the fact that Strzok hasn't been part of the Mueller investigation for over a year.

You.

Good luck with that.

No evidence.
No crime.
The Dossier ...and OHR...has been proven to be the premise.
EVIDENCE shows Strzok is dirty as hell, has been at the heart of all the indictments, Obstruction. sedition, Conspiracy, and treason!