The final level of censorship is here the banning of URLs

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by MindWars, Mar 20, 2019.

  1. MindWars
    Offline

    MindWars Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2016
    Messages:
    34,236
    Thanks Received:
    7,909
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +34,913
    In the wake of last week’s terror attacks at two New Zealand mosques which left 50 dead, several websites which either reported on the incident, hosted footage of the attacks, or have simply allowed people to engage in uncensored discussion such as Dissenter or Zero Hedge, have been partially or completely blocked in both New Zealand and Australia for the sake of “protecting consumers,” according to the CEOs of three New Zealand telcos.
    The Final Level of Censorship is Here: The Banning of URLs


    And every-time you dumb fks deny infowars truth because it comes out way before your pathetic MSM assholes get it out ( which is because they can't hide it) .

    Watch adn see it's happening dumbasses. WE TOLD YOU THIS WAS AN INFORMATION WAR YOU ------------ and you all STILL DO NOT GET what that means .you dumb ----------- are programmed to hear or see the word information war to " alex jones" they detoured you dumbasses right where they wanted you. That is why you are clueless stupid fks.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2019
  2. BULLDOG
    Offline

    BULLDOG Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2014
    Messages:
    55,048
    Thanks Received:
    6,388
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +36,686
    Info Wars is Alex Jones site dumb ass. Anything he puts out is nuts.
     
  3. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    45,108
    Thanks Received:
    7,564
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +20,158
    They were trying to block all the sites that had the unedited live stream of the attack. And, to tell you the truth, if they didn't block sites that had unedited footage of the attack, it might encourage other idiots to do the same thing.

    Personally? I don't really see a need to show people being gunned down and killed in the streets for real.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. MindWars
    Offline

    MindWars Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2016
    Messages:
    34,236
    Thanks Received:
    7,909
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +34,913
    Big Tech has proven they care more about virtue signaling to the left than standing up for free speech as world wide laws are being pushed to censor the population.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    13,031
    Thanks Received:
    2,051
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +12,282
    Since when is public consumption, of documented, historical fact; predicated upon your perceived “need”?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    45,108
    Thanks Received:
    7,564
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +20,158
    Even though I think you have me on ignore, this statement is something that needs to be responded to.

    How did you feel about the executions that ISIL put on the internet when they first got started? How did you feel about the guy that gunned down an innocent man on Facebook live stream? How did you feel about the television reporter that was killed live on television? Are all those things considered free speech in your book as well?

    Committing a crime like murder, and live streaming it on Facebook isn't protected, or free speech in my book.
     
  7. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    103,433
    Thanks Received:
    18,928
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +70,237
    You never see Fascism as a problem until they come for you
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    103,433
    Thanks Received:
    18,928
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +70,237
    If only Q wasn't a LARP
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Cosmos
    Offline

    Cosmos Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages:
    2,433
    Thanks Received:
    2,299
    Trophy Points:
    2,085
    Location:
    Ganymede
    Ratings:
    +18,600
    I wasn't interested in seeing the video, but looked all over hell to find a link to the manifesto because I wanted to see if the media reports about it matched the manifesto itself.

    Yes. I eventually found a link to it. And yes the media reports are pathetically left-leaning.

    Today I find out that the retards to our north actually make the posting the manifesto illegal. Thank God for the American Revolution.

    Man charged for sharing New Zealand shooting video — could this happen in Canada?


    “Sharing the [shooter’s] manifesto online is absolutely against the criminal code,” Warman said.

    On Monday, Hamilton police said they were investigating after a Canadian far-right website reposted the manifesto allegedly written by the terrorist behind the mosque attacks.


    READ MORE: Police investigating after Canadian far-right website reposts New Zealand terrorist’s manifesto


    Canadian law prohibits the wilful promotion of hatred against identifiable groups. A conviction carries a possible two-year sentence.



    Hmmmm.........so in Canada posting the original source material about a hateful act so people can read it for themselves is "wilful promotion of hatred". But if you pick out bits and pieces of it that only seem to match the agenda you want to push, that's ok. It's no wonder people seem to be becoming more stupid each year when they pass laws that actually forbid them from learning the truth.

    Please don't let this happen in America.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  10. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    45,108
    Thanks Received:
    7,564
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +20,158
    Documented historical fact is generally reported by the news, and while they will report on what happened, showing someone being killed is something they don't do. Either (a) they don't show the footage, or (b) they show the footage up to the point where a person gets shot. If in rare instance they do decide to show the full footage, they preface it by saying that what follows is some disturbing images.
     

Share This Page