Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Fed needs to stop avoiding pain. Pain avoidance just makes the next downturn bigger.
When a bunch of banks fuck up, they need to pay the price. If they don't, they won't change their ways. It's called moral hazard.
And, sure enough, the banks have not changed their ways. They continued their fraud unabated after being rescued and allowed to live. ISDAfix fix, LIBOR fix, etc.
And yes, the bond bubble has a potential risk of dwarfing the last crash. Instead of talking about banks that are Too Big To Fail, we will be talking about Too Big To Save.
Does the Fed know this? Some at the Fed might, but most are just as deluded as they were during the last bubble.
If interest rates go negative, people will start hoarding cash instead of depositing in a bank where they have to pay the bank to hold it.
We'll be stuffing mattresses again, and that's deflationary.
In one of the links, it explains that more cash is going to have to be printed when people start taking their money out of the bank.If interest rates go negative, people will start hoarding cash instead of depositing in a bank where they have to pay the bank to hold it.
We'll be stuffing mattresses again, and that's deflationary.
Difficult to do when over half of the cash in the nation exists only in electronic form.
If you have 100 shares of a company that has 1000 shares of common stock, and that company issues 1000 more shares, what happens to the value of your stock?
From Sweden to Spain, banks, brokers and other financial firms are grappling with technical and legal glitches thrown up by negative rates, forcing them to redesign computer systems, tear up spreadsheets and redraft legal contracts.
The issue echoes the scrambles around the Year 2000 computer bug and the launch of the euro, when some bank systems couldn’t handle the introduction of a new currency, said Kevin Burrowes, head of U.K. financial services at PricewaterhouseCoopers. A handful of malfunctioning computer programs can cause “huge problems,” while working around problems manually makes more controls necessary and increases the risk that something could go wrong, Mr. Burrowes said.
The Fed needs to stop avoiding pain. Pain avoidance just makes the next downturn bigger.
When a bunch of banks fuck up, they need to pay the price. If they don't, they won't change their ways. It's called moral hazard.
And, sure enough, the banks have not changed their ways. They continued their fraud unabated after being rescued and allowed to live. ISDAfix fix, LIBOR fix, etc.
And yes, the bond bubble has a potential risk of dwarfing the last crash. Instead of talking about banks that are Too Big To Fail, we will be talking about Too Big To Save.
Does the Fed know this? Some at the Fed might, but most are just as deluded as they were during the last bubble.
The people in the Fed go to cocktail parties with the execs of the big banks. They invest in the same schemes with them. The execs of the big banks will end up in the Fed.
That the Fed will rape the nation to benefit their close friends should be no surprise to anyone. As you said at the outset, when the Fed creates currency, it devalues the existing currency. If you have 100 shares of a company that has 1000 shares of common stock, and that company issues 1000 more shares, what happens to the value of your stock? The same holds true of currency. More dollars chasing the same pool of goods and services must reduce the value of each dollar. When the fed pumps $3 Trillion into JP Morgan - Chase, BofA, and Goldman Sachs, that money comes from the pockets of the average American. Anyone wondering why the gap between the "1%" and the rest is widening, this is your answer.
no idea why you think negative interest rates are so bad?? Can you tell us??
Aside from the reasons I have already given, here's another one.
.
Classic pain avoidance rationalization which ultimately only makes matters much worse.Aside from the reasons I have already given, here's another one.
.
I think you are missing the point. Everyone would want normal interest rates including the world's central banks but low interest rates are the current policy given liberal socialist GDP growth rates around the world. Raising rates to 6% would probably cause a depression in this environment so we are stuck here and could stay stuck just as Japan has for 3 decades now.
Classic pain avoidance rationalization which ultimately only makes matters much worse.Aside from the reasons I have already given, here's another one.
.
I think you are missing the point. Everyone would want normal interest rates including the world's central banks but low interest rates are the current policy given liberal socialist GDP growth rates around the world. Raising rates to 6% would probably cause a depression in this environment so we are stuck here and could stay stuck just as Japan has for 3 decades now.
You are an incredibly ignorant fool if you think Japan has not been struggling.Classic pain avoidance rationalization which ultimately only makes matters much worse.Aside from the reasons I have already given, here's another one.
.
I think you are missing the point. Everyone would want normal interest rates including the world's central banks but low interest rates are the current policy given liberal socialist GDP growth rates around the world. Raising rates to 6% would probably cause a depression in this environment so we are stuck here and could stay stuck just as Japan has for 3 decades now.
Don't be absurd, Japan has had low or negative rates for 30 years and no doomsday just 2% growth which defeats your whole doomsday illiteracy.
It turns out that wasn’t enough. For economies that didn’t respond to zero rates, central banks tried negative rates instead. The Swiss introduced them, and so did the Swedes, and then the European Central Bank followed the lead,cutting its rates below zero. All of a sudden a through-the-looking-glass economy was created, where the bank actually charged you for keeping money with it.
The trouble is, it didn’t work either. Its main impact has been to destroy the profitability of the banking system, which was hardly a great way to improve the economy. And central bankers realised it could only be effective if they banned cash – because of course that doesn’t pay a negative rate of interest.
Should you hoard cash? We wrote about this here and here last week. But there’s been a new development in Denmark.
The Danish government is concerned that cash puts too many “administrative and financial burdens” on shops and that it acts as a drag on GDP growth. (A McKinsey study recently suggested that if you could get rid of the stuff in the US, you could push up America’s total GDP by 0.47%.) So, as part of a wide group of proposals to boost economic growth, it is to allow shops to stop taking cash.
dear, they struggle in Africa not in Japan. Do you understand?You are an incredibly ignorant fool if you think Japan has not been struggling.
Holy shit. You just get dumber and dumber.dear, they struggle in Africa not in Japan. Do you understand?You are an incredibly ignorant fool if you think Japan has not been struggling.
dear, they struggle in Africa not in Japan. Do you understand?Holy shit. You just get dumber and dumber.dear, they struggle in Africa not in Japan. Do you understand?You are an incredibly ignorant fool if you think Japan has not been struggling.