The 'Fantasy' of 'Equal Justice' In America

Discussion in 'Politics' started by easyt65, Mar 19, 2019.

  1. easyt65
    Offline

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    51,989
    Thanks Received:
    11,127
    Trophy Points:
    2,140
    Ratings:
    +58,895
    The concept of 'Equal Justice' in the United States, where justice is applied equally to every American no matter what color, race, creed, sex, religion, monetary, or political status has come to be ranked right up there with 'the Easter Bunny' and as elusive as getting a photograph of Big Foot.

    Despite once having declared, 'There are NO 'Two Americas', one for ordinary citizens and one for the 'elitist ruling class'', Democrats continue to prove with their actions this is not the way our world, dictated by them, is.

    Case in point, the latest example:

    "Fired FBI agent Peter Strzok told Congress last year that the agency "did not have access" to Clinton Foundation emails that were on Hillary Clinton's private server because of a consent agreement "negotiated between the Department of Justice attorneys and counsel for Clinton."

    That agreement was revealed in newly released congressional transcripts from Strzok's closed-door testimony at the House Judiciary Committee on June 27, 2018.

    When asked by then-majority general counsel Zachary Somers if “the Clinton Foundation was on the server”, Strzok testified that he believed it was “on one of the servers, if not the others.” But Strzok stressed that due to an agreement between the DOJ and Clinton, they were not allowed to search Clinton Foundation emails for information that could help in their investigation.

    The FBI would have been investigating Clinton's emails in 2016, when former President Barack Obama was still in office and when Clinton was running for president against then-candidate Donald Trump.

    Somers asked in the 2018 hearing: “Were you given access to those emails as part of the investigation?”

    Strzok replied: “We were not. We did not have access," according to the transcript."


    'DID NOT HAVE ACCESS'?!

    Ummmm, this is the FBI....the same guys who raid people's homes at 'o-dark-thirty' wearing SWAT equipment and with guns drawn to SEIZE, with force if necessary, hard drives, PCs, laptops, cell phones, any electronics, discs, USBs, e-mails, and documents of ordinary citizens and anyone associated with President Trump.... How could they NOT have access?

    I mean, they followed non-standard protocol, as the US IG pointed out -- they ASKED her nicely to turn over any and all evidence...when it was convenient for her to do so. They allowed HER to tell THEM what she would be willing and would not be willing to turn over on the 1 illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server illegally containing TOP SECRET data...one of 2 servers, we now know, she had....

    So HOW could the top police agency in the US NOT have access?

    Oh yeah, that's right.....

    They AGREED not to look at / seize the criminal suspect's 2nd server, the one pertaining to their 'Clinton Foundation', their 'charity' that received over $100 MILLION from the Russians, specifically from the Russian who led the KGB Bank's effort to acquire Uranium One.

    THIS is what Democrats (and snowflakes) call '1 America' and 'EQUAL Justice' for all'....


    :wtf:


    Oh, So This Is Why The FBI Couldn't View The Clinton Foundation Emails On Hillary's Unauthorized Server

    .
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Golfing Gator
    Offline

    Golfing Gator Gold Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    28,612
    Thanks Received:
    3,512
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Midwest of America
    Ratings:
    +19,338
    Who has ever believed there was equal justice in the United States?


    Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    109,263
    Thanks Received:
    13,831
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +61,223
    Dim scumbags pretend we do.
     
  4. Golfing Gator
    Offline

    Golfing Gator Gold Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    28,612
    Thanks Received:
    3,512
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Midwest of America
    Ratings:
    +19,338
    And you believed them?!??


    Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
     
  5. dudmuck
    Online

    dudmuck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2017
    Messages:
    3,962
    Thanks Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    Camarillo, CA
    Ratings:
    +3,186
    There is plenty of other records of a non profit foundation, rather than just some emails on a private server.
    If there was anything fishy, some state AG would be going after it.
    Case in point.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. DigitalDrifter
    Online

    DigitalDrifter Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2013
    Messages:
    28,773
    Thanks Received:
    5,534
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Oregon
    Ratings:
    +25,672
    Who has "EVER" believed ?

    I'm certain over the course of the history of this country, there have been countless #'s of naive Americans who have thought so.
     
  7. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    47,070
    Thanks Received:
    10,087
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +23,808
    So the 30,000 private emails were never destroyed as you all claimed???

    What is it that you do not understand about these emails having nothing to do with Benghazi, (the subpoena for the Benghazi emails and later all govt emails)?

    When Ivanka was illegally using her private email domain for gvt use, and got caught, she simply turned over what she believed to be her gvt emails, and kept all of her business and private emails from us. Did you throw a fit over that....?

    A subpoena is for specific reason, showing probable cause of a specific crime, that you are pretty certain you will find, if you are allowed to take the person's constitutional right to privacy, away from them.

    Subpoenas to search someone's private property are not nilly dilly.

    Even if this somehow ended up in a court suit for them, Clinton's lawyers likely would have won.

    Outside of that, I agree justice is not blind in this country... the wealthy get kid glove treatment, like Jeffrey Epstein.
     
  8. easyt65
    Offline

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    51,989
    Thanks Received:
    11,127
    Trophy Points:
    2,140
    Ratings:
    +58,895
    It's not really an issue of 'nothing fishy going on so a non-profit server was ignored'. It is the double-standard between how Hillary and Cohen / Manafort were treated. As pointed out, the latter were not ASKED to turn things over, afforded the ability to tell the FBI what THEY would decide to turn over or not, and / or were negotiated with in order to come to an agreement regarding what things the FBI would and would not ignore.
     
  9. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    47,070
    Thanks Received:
    10,087
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +23,808
    Cohen's subpoena allowed President Trump's lawyers to go through the things Trump may have been involved in, and take them out, before the FBI could search Cohen's stuff.
     
  10. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    109,263
    Thanks Received:
    13,831
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +61,223
    You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Trump's lawyers never went through Cohen's papers and effects.
     

Share This Page