The Envirowhackos are Melting!

[Crick]

The mainstream science posters here have likely posted orders of magnitude more evidence than have the deniers. And considering that most denier "evidence" comes from very questionable sources while most mainstream evidence comes from published science journals... well, you get the picture.

You need a dictionary very badly...what you guys tend to post is data...and then you make assumptions about what it means,..

Evidence - that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.

Data - individual facts, statistics, or items of information

You have data and assumptions....not evidence which is precisely why when I ask for evidence to support claims, you can't produce it...the data is just information...it doesn't support your claims...

God are you stupid. The only one who thinks the data collected and presented by the tens of thousands of climate studies that support AGW are NOT evidence is you. I've brought up many studies here. You have not. Tell you what. Why don't you find us a study that supports the conclusions of the IPCC with empirical data and then explain to us in that specific case why those data are not actually evidence.

And, of course, we're still waiting for your observations of ANY matter under ANY circumstances that ceases to radiate - as you claim happens with all matter constantly.

 

[SSDD]

God are you stupid. The only one who thinks the data collected and presented by the tens of thousands of climate studies that support AGW are NOT evidence is you.

So why can't you provide a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability?

I've brought up many studies here.

all models all the time..

You have not.

And that is a bald faced lie....you can't write two sentences without telling a lie, can you?..

Tell you what. Why don't you find us a study that supports the conclusions of the IPCC with empirical data and then explain to us in that specific case why those data are not actually evidence.

Therein lies the problem...there are no studies based on observed, measured evidence which support the IPCC position...and precisely the reason you can't provide any...for f%ks sake..you, yourself said that my request for a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability was an unreasonable request...

And you said that it was just to much to ask for to expect a single piece of observed measured evidence which established a coherent relationship between the absorption of IR by a gas and warming in the atmosphere...you admitted that you couldn't produce any and then mewled that I was being unreasonable for even asking...

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

—NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.

Chuck Todd is just another brainwashed climate change cultist.
"Infidel", "heretic" and "denier" all crazy cult terms.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We asked for: evidence and lab work.

Thus far, the Warmers have posted neither

 

[SSDD]

We asked for: evidence and lab work.

Thus far, the Warmers have posted neither

Nor will they ever....such is pseudoscience...

They are making it pretty clear that in their minds data + assumption = evidence

 

[Crick]

You both know precisely where to go to find that evidence.

When you say you know there is none, you lie.

 

[jc456]

So in science it’s acceptable to pick a side and suppress all alternatives?

Not inviting idiot deniers to the table is not "suppression". All of you denier fools are free to stand on the corner with a bullhorn amd embarrass yourselves any time you like.


And yes, it is not only acceptable to pick the correct side, it is smart.

What is it about fools like you who have no evidence telling others they can’t join a debate? Fool

 

[SSDD]

You both know precisely where to go to find that evidence.

When you say you know there is none, you lie.

I know where you say it is...I know I have been there and can say with supreme confidence that it isn't...I can say that there is not a shred of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability in absolute certainty that neither you, nor anyone else is going to bring such evidence forward to prove me wrong...

If you believe it to be there, then you have been duped...and by your own admission, the data there was sufficient to fool you...

 

[SSDD]

So in science it’s acceptable to pick a side and suppress all alternatives?

Not inviting idiot deniers to the table is not "suppression". All of you denier fools are free to stand on the corner with a bullhorn amd embarrass yourselves any time you like.


And yes, it is not only acceptable to pick the correct side, it is smart.

What is it about fools like you who have no evidence telling others they can’t join a debate? Fool

That is how socialists invariably behave.....they tell you how great their beliefs are and when you don't agree, you find yourself shipped off to a gulag somewhere so that you can't point out that everyone is living in misery...

 

[Crick]

That is certainly not the case in almost entirely socialist western Europe, is it.