The entire AGW movement is founded on a false premise.

[Toddsterpatriot]

AGW is EnviroMarxism. It's about redistribution of wealth and has nothing in common with science

Yeah, right.

Source

All most all the redistribution of wealth is from the middle class to the rich these past 40 years. The fact we spend a little bit on feeding the poor and making sure our country doesn't have slums like India doesn't change this fact.

All most all the redistribution of wealth is from the middle class to the rich these past 40 years.

BS.

 

[cnm]

BS.

I wonder where it came from then.

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com

 

[SSDD]

And SSDD of the smart photons continues to be a lying fuck. Virtually all of the scientists in the world disagree with him, but that phases him not. After all, an obese junkie on the AM radio, and a fake British Lord agree with him. LOL

And yet...with all those scientists supposedly agreeing...neither you..nor all of them can provide a single shred of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supporting AGW over natural variability...what does that say about the state of climate science?

Observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence of all of the hard sciences: quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, elementary particles, etc have been codified in mathematics with accuracies of parts per billion. If you don't believe in the mathematics, you don't believe in science. Period.

So if you can manage to find your way through all your props..smoke and mirrors and such, lets see some observed, measured, quantified empirical evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...if you can find your way through the smoke and mirrors that is..

 

[SSDD]

I repeat...evidence...that's a funny word for a warmer to use...can you provide a single piece of observed measured, quantified, empirical evidence supporting the AGW hypothesis over natural variation?

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

OK...that is somewhat shaky evidence that it is getting warmer (due to the amount of manipulation to the data) but for the purpose of this discussion, lets assume it is mostly true...how does that support the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...how does an increase in temperature support the claim that man is responsible rather than it being just business as usual?

 

[SSDD]

1000 odd years of 'natural variation' enough for you?.

Hockey stick controversy - Wikipedia

Anyone who doesn't know that the hockey stick is bullshit by now is really a top shelf dupe...did you notice that the hockey stick..once the centerpiece of the IPCC case for AGW has conspicuously disappeared from the IPCC? It is discredited...debunked...fakery and always was.

This ice core from Greenland covering the past 10K years and the following one from Vostok, covering the same period are the gold standard insofar as proxy reconstructions go and they put the lie to your graph...

Note the temperature spikes seen in the Arctic are also visible in the Antarctic...demonstrating that the warm and cold periods were global as opposed to the warmer claim of being merely regional.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And SSDD of the smart photons continues to be a lying fuck. Virtually all of the scientists in the world disagree with him, but that phases him not. After all, an obese junkie on the AM radio, and a fake British Lord agree with him. LOL

Virtually? Name them.



.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

BS.

I wonder where it came from then.

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com

Show me it came from redistribution.

 

[Billy_Bob]

BS.

I wonder where it came from then.

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com

we were making head way upwards prior to OBAMA and then it took a nose dive after he was elected... Nice.. SO your side is the making the rich richer and the poor dependent. Thanks for the evidence we needed to say we don't want stupid democrat policies.. they are killing the middle class..

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL For burger flippers like Silly Billy. For those with needed skills, there have been substantial raises. You see, industry is short almost six million craftsmen, and there is competition for those with proven skills.

 

[Old Rocks]

And SSDD of the smart photons continues to be a lying fuck. Virtually all of the scientists in the world disagree with him, but that phases him not. After all, an obese junkie on the AM radio, and a fake British Lord agree with him. LOL

Virtually? Name them.



.

OK. Scientists are represented by groups like Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and by the universities they teach in. Now, Bear, your challenge is to find me some of those groups that state the AGW is not real.

Because almost all of them state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

 

[SSDD]

And SSDD of the smart photons continues to be a lying fuck. Virtually all of the scientists in the world disagree with him, but that phases him not. After all, an obese junkie on the AM radio, and a fake British Lord agree with him. LOL

Virtually? Name them.



.

OK. Scientists are represented by groups like Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and by the universities they teach in. Now, Bear, your challenge is to find me some of those groups that state the AGW is not real.

Because almost all of them state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

We all know that most of the membership of all those academies aren't on board the AGW crazy train...only the political heads...and that is very likely to change drastically when riding the crazy train is no longer in vogue and actual science is required if one wants to get government grant money.

I believe you are going to see them revising their statements radically over the next year or so...which will prove the point I have been making all along...that they are political whores who will say whatever is required to maintain a good space at the money trough.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And SSDD of the smart photons continues to be a lying fuck. Virtually all of the scientists in the world disagree with him, but that phases him not. After all, an obese junkie on the AM radio, and a fake British Lord agree with him. LOL

Virtually? Name them.



.

OK. Scientists are represented by groups like Scientific Societies, National Academies of Science, and by the universities they teach in. Now, Bear, your challenge is to find me some of those groups that state the AGW is not real.

Because almost all of them state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

How many more times do I have to embarrass you old rocks about your list that includes the likes of worm scientist and all the rest riding the gravey train?


.