The Embrace of Civil War: LABOR LEADER CALLS FOR WAR ON REPUBLICANS

There's a huge difference between Biden rightly calling someone a terrorist and him equating "his political enemies to the murders responsible for 9/11".

Some of A = B is not the same as ALL of A = B.

Logic 101 bub.

So you think it is appropriate for a sitting Vice President to label a PEACEFUL, LAWFUL political movement that elected 58 people to Congress as terrorists?

Yes.

A terrorist is someone who uses fear and terror as a weapon to advance their cause. That's it. There is nothing in the definition about hijacking planes and killing innocent people. The GOP back in December were acting like terrorists. They were using fear to get what they wanted, the upper tax cut rates to be extended. The Tea Party was acting like terrorists in the debt ceiling discussion because they were claiming they would trash the economy unless they got spending cuts.

Biden was correct in his description.

You are pathetic. The blatant hypocrisy that spews from leftists like yourself is sickening. This is the new tone. When the first acts of violence are committed, it is you and this administration that will have blood on its hands.
 
Calling his political enemies terrorists. Who committed those murderous acts on 9/11? Terrorists.

Someone failed logic 101. Answer--Dontbestupid.

Your logic means you believe that if you call someone a Christian, that is EXACTLY the same as calling them a pedophile. Because, the pedophile priests were Christian.

B is part of A =/= ALL of A is B.
 
Yes, all of the Democrat congressmen that told reporters after the closed door meeting that Biden equated the GOP to terrorists were lying. They were lying when they said that Rep. Mike Doyle said the same. Sources: Joe Biden likened tea partiers to terrorists - Jonathan Allen and John Bresnahan - POLITICO.com

Politico is standing firmly behind the story.

Are you this delusional and partisan that you believe Biden didn't say those things? Really?

There's a huge difference between Biden rightly calling someone a terrorist and him equating "his political enemies to the murders responsible for 9/11".

Some of A = B is not the same as ALL of A = B.

Logic 101 bub.

Calling his political enemies terrorists. Who committed those murderous acts on 9/11? Terrorists.

Someone failed logic 101. Answer--Dontbestupid. :razz:
I wonder if the left can find one instance where Bush/Cheney or Bush/Quayle or Reagan/Bush called their political enemies terrorists or some close equivalent? Hell, did even Clinton/Gore do that???
 
Yes.

A terrorist is someone who uses fear and terror as a weapon to advance their cause. That's it. There is nothing in the definition about hijacking planes and killing innocent people. The GOP back in December were acting like terrorists. They were using fear to get what they wanted, the upper tax cut rates to be extended. The Tea Party was acting like terrorists in the debt ceiling discussion because they were claiming they would trash the economy unless they got spending cuts.

Biden was correct in his description.

The hysterical part is that you seriously believe the tripe you spew!

Violence is a fundamental component of terrorism. That applies to Obama's apologists much more accurately than the TEA Party.

Your accusation is just a variation on the claim that anyone who disagrees with the Democrat Party is a traitor.
 
Last edited:
Calling his political enemies terrorists. Who committed those murderous acts on 9/11? Terrorists.

Someone failed logic 101. Answer--Dontbestupid.

Your logic means you believe that if you call someone a Christian, that is EXACTLY the same as calling them a pedophile. Because, the pedophile priests were Christian.

B is part of A =/= ALL of A is B.

HAHAHA You are dumb.
 
Calling his political enemies terrorists. Who committed those murderous acts on 9/11? Terrorists.

Someone failed logic 101. Answer--Dontbestupid.

Your logic means you believe that if you call someone a Christian, that is EXACTLY the same as calling them a pedophile. Because, the pedophile priests were Christian.

B is part of A =/= ALL of A is B.

HAHAHA You are dumb.

Why? Because I understand basic logic and the English language?
 
Article in todays newspaper claimed that Union donations to Democrats at the Federal level were down 40%.......

just sayin................

and they wonder why the term thug comes to mind? .....you've hit upon one facet, motivation, unions are on their back foot, the prevailing winds are against them, example from the NY Times;

snip-

Postal Service Is Nearing Default as Losses Mount
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
Published: September 4, 2011

“Our situation is extremely serious,” the postmaster general, Patrick R. Donahoe, said in an interview. “If Congress doesn’t act, we will default.”

In recent weeks, Mr. Donahoe has been pushing a series of painful cost-cutting measures to erase the agency’s deficit, which will reach $9.2 billion this fiscal year. They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers — nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force — despite a no-layoffs clause in the unions’ contracts…

At the same time, decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.


more at-
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/05/b...uggles-to-stay-solvent-and-relevant.html?_r=1



That example above, is something anyone can understand........now add to that the Wisconsin, where the birthplace of Public sector unions [have] just suffered a bellwether defeat, Dues are no longer collected by the state, the union must now basically count on voluntarily submittals that have shown almost exactly that %, a drop off, approx. 30-35% when left to the device of the actual member to send it in, they don't by over a third.

Any new stimulus will be a boon for unions how have the Feds behind them ala the Davis-Bacon act any work via fed $$ must be set at the union wages levels, the Unions are threatened by the reps backed by the TP and indies to cut off the flow of money, its really that simple, despite the NLRBs best efforts and counter productive machinations ala the Boeing issue, lack of congressional sppt for Card Check, and the economic malaise where in cushy union benefits are not seen as helpful and in fact are counter productive in many cases, they don't have a sympathetic ear except amongst their own, they have never been threatened with this kind of push back before, so, they are going to the mattresses......

This is not helpful, this rhetoric is not appealing to moderates Indies etc...on the back of Maxine Waters and the other 2 congresscritters ala "they" want to see folks hanging from trees etc....they will lose that sppt. and any violence that occurs? The blood is on their hands.
 
Last edited:
Your logic means you believe that if you call someone a Christian, that is EXACTLY the same as calling them a pedophile. Because, the pedophile priests were Christian.

B is part of A =/= ALL of A is B.

HAHAHA You are dumb.

Why? Because I understand basic logic and the English language?

You have a loose understanding of the English language. You believe that me saying that the VP calling his political enemies terrorists means he is equating them to terrorists that murdered thousands on 9/11 is the same thing as calling Christians a pedophiles.

That is why you are dumb.
 
You have a loose understanding of the English language. You believe that me saying that the VP calling his political enemies terrorists means he is equating them to terrorists that murdered thousands on 9/11 is the same thing as calling Christians a pedophiles.

That is why you are dumb.

Terrorist is the new "N" word ?
 
Article in todays newspaper claimed that Union donations to Democrats at the Federal level were down 40%.......

just sayin................

and they wonder why the term thug comes to mind? .....you've hit upon one facet, motivation, unions are on their back foot, the prevailing winds are against them, example from the NY Times;

snip-

Postal Service Is Nearing Default as Losses Mount
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
Published: September 4, 2011

“Our situation is extremely serious,” the postmaster general, Patrick R. Donahoe, said in an interview. “If Congress doesn’t act, we will default.”

In recent weeks, Mr. Donahoe has been pushing a series of painful cost-cutting measures to erase the agency’s deficit, which will reach $9.2 billion this fiscal year. They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers — nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force — despite a no-layoffs clause in the unions’ contracts…

At the same time, decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.


more at-
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/05/b...uggles-to-stay-solvent-and-relevant.html?_r=1



That example above, is something anyone can understand........now add to that the Wisconsin, where the birthplace of Public sector unions [have] just suffered a bellwether defeat, Dues are no longer collected by the state, the union must now basically count on voluntarily submittals that have shown almost exactly that %, a drop off, approx. 30-35% when left to the device of the actual member to send it in, they don't by over a third.

Any new stimulus will be a boon for unions how have the Feds behind them ala the Davis-Bacon act any work via fed $$ must be set at the union wages levels, the Unions are threatened by the reps backed by the TP and indies to cut off the flow of money, its really that simple, despite the NLRBs best efforts and counter productive machinations ala the Boeing issue, lack of congressional sppt for Card Check, and the economic malaise where in cushy union benefits are not seen as helpful and in fact are counter productive in many cases, they don't have a sympathetic ear except amongst their own, they have never been threatened with this kind of push back before, so, they are going to the mattresses......

This is not helpful, this rhetoric is not appealing to moderates Indies etc...on the back of Maxine Waters and the other 2 congresscritters ala "they" want to se folks haning from trees etc....they will lose that sppt. and any violence that occurs? The blood is on their hands.

Union donations to federal candidates at the beginning of this year were down about 40% compared with the same period in 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Last month, a dozen trade unions said they would boycott next year's Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., to express frustration about the economy and to protest the event's location in a right-to-work state.
Obama has fences to mend with labor | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

Oops....... I think Obama has some explaining to do.............
 
HAHAHA You are dumb.

Why? Because I understand basic logic and the English language?

You have a loose understanding of the English language. You believe that me saying that the VP calling his political enemies terrorists means he is equating them to terrorists that murdered thousands on 9/11 is the same thing as calling Christians a pedophiles.

That is why you are dumb.

Ok. Clarify for us all then because you are not being consistent. What you are saying is:

Calling someone a terrorist is equating them with the murderers of 9/11, even though not all terrorists were involved in 9/11. But, calling someone a Christian is NOT equating them with pedophiles, because not all Christians were involved in the molesting of young boys.
 
Last edited:
Article in todays newspaper claimed that Union donations to Democrats at the Federal level were down 40%.......

just sayin................

and they wonder why the term thug comes to mind? .....you've hit upon one facet, motivation, unions are on their back foot, the prevailing winds are against them, example from the NY Times;

snip-

Postal Service Is Nearing Default as Losses Mount
By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
Published: September 4, 2011

“Our situation is extremely serious,” the postmaster general, Patrick R. Donahoe, said in an interview. “If Congress doesn’t act, we will default.”

In recent weeks, Mr. Donahoe has been pushing a series of painful cost-cutting measures to erase the agency’s deficit, which will reach $9.2 billion this fiscal year. They include eliminating Saturday mail delivery, closing up to 3,700 postal locations and laying off 120,000 workers — nearly one-fifth of the agency’s work force — despite a no-layoffs clause in the unions’ contracts…

At the same time, decades of contractual promises made to unionized workers, including no-layoff clauses, are increasing the post office’s costs. Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors. Postal workers also receive more generous health benefits than most other federal employees.


more at-
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/05/b...uggles-to-stay-solvent-and-relevant.html?_r=1



That example above, is something anyone can understand........now add to that the Wisconsin, where the birthplace of Public sector unions [have] just suffered a bellwether defeat, Dues are no longer collected by the state, the union must now basically count on voluntarily submittals that have shown almost exactly that %, a drop off, approx. 30-35% when left to the device of the actual member to send it in, they don't by over a third.

Any new stimulus will be a boon for unions how have the Feds behind them ala the Davis-Bacon act any work via fed $$ must be set at the union wages levels, the Unions are threatened by the reps backed by the TP and indies to cut off the flow of money, its really that simple, despite the NLRBs best efforts and counter productive machinations ala the Boeing issue, lack of congressional sppt for Card Check, and the economic malaise where in cushy union benefits are not seen as helpful and in fact are counter productive in many cases, they don't have a sympathetic ear except amongst their own, they have never been threatened with this kind of push back before, so, they are going to the mattresses......

This is not helpful, this rhetoric is not appealing to moderates Indies etc...on the back of Maxine Waters and the other 2 congresscritters ala "they" want to se folks haning from trees etc....they will lose that sppt. and any violence that occurs? The blood is on their hands.

Union donations to federal candidates at the beginning of this year were down about 40% compared with the same period in 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Last month, a dozen trade unions said they would boycott next year's Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., to express frustration about the economy and to protest the event's location in a right-to-work state.
Obama has fences to mend with labor | Detroit Free Press | freep.com

Oops....... I think Obama has some explaining to do.............
Hence the increase in dangerous liberal agitation and rhetoric. They're trying to gin up the crazy and the Tea Partiers aren't biting at the bait. So they're going to manufacture it themselves till they can either blackmail the money out of their 'reluctant' supporters, or shut down their opposition.
 
Kristallnacht - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the next desired step. Replace the word "Jew" with Tea Partier.

Which then once the 'threat' is gone, they will then engage in this:

Night of the Long Knives - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

... and consolidate their power and free themselves of internal factions, solidifying behind a charismatic, sociopathic strong man.

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Santayana

Liberal tactics against the TEA party are chillingly Naziesque. I sometimes think I'm reading Nazi propaganda from the 30s whenever I peruse a post by one of these forum lib brownshirts about the TEA party.
 
Kristallnacht - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the next desired step. Replace the word "Jew" with Tea Partier.

Which then once the 'threat' is gone, they will then engage in this:

Night of the Long Knives - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

... and consolidate their power and free themselves of internal factions, solidifying behind a charismatic, sociopathic strong man.

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Santayana

Your disrespect for the victims of the Holocaust is appalling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top