edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
In your original lie you said that he was shot twice to the back of the head, but he was still alive when the police arrived on the scene, so not being dead and not shot in the head twice he could have resisted until the robber heard the sirens approaching.But the alleged shooter couldn't grab his wallet? So what was the fucking point? Do you even think these things through??It was after 4 AM and the police said there were several robberies in the area, and they got there so fast that he was still alive when they got to him so they probably scared the robber off.This case bothers me. You got a young dead guy, but nothing taken? Shot at night in a city with probably more cameras and Police than anywhere on the planet?The lies just keep on coming.
Actually it was the police who said it was a botched robbery and that he was shot in the back, they did not say "back of the head."
If you have any evidence that your lies are not lies, the police are eager to hear from you!
Yet...silence is all you hear..........silence. No Oswald or James Earl Jones on this one. Pop. no one coming/going from the area. no cars? nobody on foot? witness? neighbors? nothing?
Dead guy on sidewalk but "botched" robbery? They could have taken any and all.