Jimmy Carter was quoted Saturday in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette as saying "I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history." The white house responded with this. "I think it's sad that President Carter's reckless personal criticism is out there," said Fratto. "I think it's unfortunate. And I think he is proving to be increasingly irrelevant with these kinds of comments." Okay, so what makes them any better for attacking a former president? Does this mean that everyone who dissagrees with this administration is "increasingly irrelevant"? If they respond that way to a former president, why would they think normal american people (who never served in office) are relevant either? Perhaps if he listened to the "irrelevant" critics, (also known as the citizens of the U.S.) he would still have controll of congress and the house right now. More proof that this administration, is increasingly out of touch with everyone outside of the bubble.
You and others, including myself have had much to say about the administration, however that is not fodder for those who wish us harm. Seriously, the Jimmah is funded by radical Palestinians which is what caused him his last brouhaha. HE is the worst president ever, he's hoping to market the idea that he's not the worst.
Yes I think that Bush does consider all of his critics, no matter how much they continue to increase in numbers, to be "irrelevant". The fact of the matter is, this lame-duck President, now less popular than Hemmeroids, is the one fast become "irrelevant".
I see. If it's Monday night there must be torture on FOX. When it's over, I'd love to get a look at these links myself.
You are aware that Carter has changed what he said. he has stated he only meant worst when compared to Nixon's administration, which he said he thought did well. He specifically said he did not intend to say worst of all Presidents.
