The Demoicrats and the left support Obama as he violates the Constitution and the law

[OohPooPahDoo]

If the Senate was in recess, why is only ONE Democratic senator saying so? Even Harry Reid refuses to say if the Senate was in or out of session when the appointments were made.

If the Senate is not recessed and they give a damn that Obama made an appointment without their consent, why haven't they passed a single measure saying so?

Because Senate Repubs know that if they push the issue they're likely gonna have to answer for their own part in this.

Sounds like consent to me.

Sorry, but if a legislative body is supposed to give consent for something whenever they are around to do so - and the executive does something without their express consent - and that legislative body does nothing about it - they are giving implied consent.


I would further point out that if the President is indeed making an appointment while the Senate is not recessed - the Senate itself is the damaged party, and if they fail to speak up on their own behalf, the issue is de-facto settled.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Obama made an illegal appointment. Recess appointments may only be made while Congress is in RECESS. It never recessed. He violated the law and the left on this board is applauding and cheering.

And the left wonders why the right finds them to be ignorant and hypocrites.

Once again for the slow and stupid, Congress never recessed. If Congress does not recess a President must get approval for his nominees from the Senate.

Lawyers on this board that are democrats or liberals are applauding his decision to BREAK the law and violate the Constitution.

Once again for Modbert, this is not about whether he can appoint in a recess, he can. This is about a flagrant violation of the law and the Constitution. Congress never recessed.

Lawyers are not always intelligent. Alot of times they are just tools.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Obama made an illegal adppointment. Recess appointments may only be made while Congress is in RECESS. It never recessed. He violated the law and the left on this board is applauding and cheering.

And the left wonders why the right finds them to be ignorant and hypocrites.

Once again for the slow and stupid, Congress never recessed. If Congress does not recess a President must get approval for his nominees from the Senate.

Lawyers on this board that are democrats or liberals are applauding his decision to BREAK the law and violate the Constitution.

Once again for Modbert, this is not about whether he can appoint in a recess, he can. This is about a flagrant violation of the law and the Constitution. Congress never recessed.

So when the former deserter-in-chief....the shrub was making Recess Appointment, John Bolton Comes To Mind....did you call those appointments "Illegal"?

Pay very close attention the bar graph gunny, you will see that the Great Ronnie God, The Rectum Himself made the most Recess Appointments, were those "Illegal"?

Rachel Maddow Show.

Reagan a rectum huh? Well that makes obamaturd a, turd. Dimwits love illegality when it benefits them, like illegal voting, illegal immigration. Violating the constitution to them is no big deal as long as it benefits them, idiots.

 

[rightwinger]

It's January 8 2012 and Republicans STILL haven't returned from Christmas vacation

But.....Nooooooooo...they are not on recess

 

[g5000]

So what do we have here? The House and Senate pass a law and the President signs it.

Then some titty baby sore losers decide they won't allow the law to actually be put into action by denying the appointment of a director created by this new law. A director everyone agrees is eminently qualified.

Who are we saying is flaunting the law again?

 

[jillian]

It's January 8 2012 and Republicans STILL haven't returned from Christmas vacation

But.....Nooooooooo...they are not on recess

i'm... shocked... shocked i tell ya.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What's the excuse prior to Obama?

I never claimed Bush was the Messiah® who would turn water to wine an make a Marxist paradise for all the good little bois and gurls..

I need no excuse.

Face facts, had we elected a wino in a Snoopy costume, he would have done a better job as president than Obama has.

 

[konradv]

What's the excuse prior to Obama?

I never claimed Bush was the Messiah® who would turn water to wine an make a Marxist paradise for all the good little bois and gurls..

I need no excuse.

Face facts, had we elected a wino in a Snoopy costume, he would have done a better job as president than Obama has.

I think the Reps need to face the fact that they're going to have to do deal with him for another four years. If he's punking them now, what about when he doesn't have to worry about running again? Two can play the intransigence game. If we're going to move forward as a nation, they're going to have to act more maturely than they have lately.

 

[AmericanFirst]

If the Senate was in recess, why is only ONE Democratic senator saying so? Even Harry Reid refuses to say if the Senate was in or out of session when the appointments were made.

If the Senate is not recessed and they give a damn that Obama made an appointment without their consent, why haven't they passed a single measure saying so?

Because the dimwit controlled senate and the idiot reid are obamaturd butt kissers, why else.

 

[bravoactual]

Obama made an illegal appointment. Recess appointments may only be made while Congress is in RECESS. It never recessed. He violated the law and the left on this board is applauding and cheering.

And the left wonders why the right finds them to be ignorant and hypocrites.

Once again for the slow and stupid, Congress never recessed. If Congress does not recess a President must get approval for his nominees from the Senate.

Lawyers on this board that are democrats or liberals are applauding his decision to BREAK the law and violate the Constitution.

Once again for Modbert, this is not about whether he can appoint in a recess, he can. This is about a flagrant violation of the law and the Constitution. Congress never recessed.

One Hundred Seventy-One (171) Recess Appointments.

That is number of Recess Appointments made by the deserter-in-chief.

Did you bitch at each and every one of these One Hundred Seventy-One (171) Recess Appointments made by the deserter-in chief?

Did you accuse the deserter-in-chief of subverting the Constitution with each and everyone of these One Hundred Seventy-One (171) Recess Appointments?

No, of course not.

YOU had no problem with each and everyone of the deserter-in-chief's One Hundred Seventy-One (171) Recess Appointments.

You are a HYPOCRITE.

You know your a HYPOCRITE.

But being a LIFER, being a HYPOCRITE is so fracking easy.

 

[rightwinger]

The Senate would be really pissed off about all this if there was anyone currently in Washington

 

[Uncensored2008]

I think the Reps need to face the fact that they're going to have to do deal with him for another four years.

ROFL

Not unless the election is a complete and open fraud. Obama cannot win a fair contest, and you know it.

If he's punking them now, what about when he doesn't have to worry about running again? Two can play the intransigence game. If we're going to move forward as a nation, they're going to have to act more maturely than they have lately.

Obama is a disaster, a complete failure as POTUS.

Seriously, let's go with the Wino in a Snoopy costume.

 

[editec]

The Demoicrats and the left support Obama as he violates the Constitution and the law

FYI, lad, I'm informed that more Dems voted AGAINST this bill than Republicans.

 

[Uncensored2008]

FYI, lad, I'm informed that more Dems voted AGAINST this bill than Republicans.

You've been misinformed.

 

[konradv]

I think the Reps need to face the fact that they're going to have to do deal with him for another four years.

ROFL

Not unless the election is a complete and open fraud. Obama cannot win a fair contest, and you know it.

Well, it's not a fair contest, but that has more to do with the weakness of the Republican field, than anything Obama has done or will do.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well, it's not a fair contest, but that has more to do with the weakness of the Republican field, than anything Obama has done or will do.

If the election is free of fraud, Obama loses.

 

[Mustang]

The Senate would be really pissed off about all this if there was anyone currently in Washington

Yeah, they would pass a resolution condemning the president...if it wasn't for the fact that they're in recess.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Obama made an illegal appointment. Recess appointments may only be made while Congress is in RECESS. It never recessed. He violated the law and the left on this board is applauding and cheering.

And the left wonders why the right finds them to be ignorant and hypocrites.

Once again for the slow and stupid, Congress never recessed. If Congress does not recess a President must get approval for his nominees from the Senate.

Lawyers on this board that are democrats or liberals are applauding his decision to BREAK the law and violate the Constitution.

Once again for Modbert, this is not about whether he can appoint in a recess, he can. This is about a flagrant violation of the law and the Constitution. Congress never recessed.

What do you expect????

Obama is a tyrant and progressives WANT the government to run our lives....

Why would they care???

In their authoritarian universe, the constitution is just an "old" document that prevents progressive leaders from doing what "they want."

Remember we're talking about people who idolize guys like Ernesto "Che" Guevara..