CDZ The democrat party, created Jim Crow laws and fought against Civil Rights, disband it?

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by 2aguy, Aug 18, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,246
    Thanks Received:
    9,190
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +36,010
    If we are going after the taint of slavery and hate....then shouldn't the democrat party be disbanded and their assets used to pay the victims of their hate?

    The democrat party fought to preserve slavery.....they created the Jim Crow laws after the Civil War, and they fought to keep the Blacks that the Republican party freed from having the same Rights as white democrats.....
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Cellblock2429
    Online

    Cellblock2429 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Messages:
    5,492
    Thanks Received:
    823
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    New York
    Ratings:
    +4,994
    /----/ and I believe this is the real reason the Libs want the statutes taken down. They are a constant reminded of the Democrat slave owners and their attempt to split the nation.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. bodecea
    Online

    bodecea Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    102,247
    Thanks Received:
    11,835
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    #HasNoClothes
    Ratings:
    +30,699
    Yes, the Southern Democrats did create Jim Crow laws and Southern Democrats AND Republicans fought against Civil Rights. But Northern Democrats AND Republicans fought FOR Civil Rights.....and won.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,246
    Thanks Received:
    9,190
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +36,010

    Sorry.....the democrat party was and still is the party of racism.....we need to close it down and give it's assets to their victims.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    6,676
    Thanks Received:
    954
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +5,355
    now to support your argument , please put up a link proving what you said...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  6. Toronado3800
    Offline

    Toronado3800 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    4,202
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +557
    We should end this by just agreeing racism is wrong as you appear to be saying.

    I want you to just use Wikipedia on the presidential elections between 1960 and 1976 before you post more bumper stickers. The parties flipped. Something is happening again btw, it is quite interesting.

    Racism wis wrong though, we agree. Quit trying to find a clear cut "my team is good, yours bad" answer for everything. It makes ppl stretch logic.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    6,676
    Thanks Received:
    954
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +5,355
    200 years of the Democrats being racist, and then magically the parties switched. Some people have their heads shoved way up Uranus, that is for sure.

    liberals-head-up-his-ass.jpg
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  8. Cellblock2429
    Online

    Cellblock2429 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Messages:
    5,492
    Thanks Received:
    823
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    New York
    Ratings:
    +4,994
    /----/ the parties didn't flip. The democRATS are attempting to rewrite history.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Slash
    Offline

    Slash Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2017
    Messages:
    660
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +247

    Call it what you want, but you can go back and look at the parties platforms in presidential election. Republicans were the socially progressive and liberal party. They were for more taxes, labor unions, stronger and larger federal government, welfare, social services, large gov't funded projects, more money for education, a more liberal immigration policy, and had their base strongly founded in urban area's and the Northeast.

    The Democrats were the socially conservative group that were for less taxes, free markets, an original interpretation of the Constitution, smaller federal government, religious right, largely based in rural areas and the South. I mean guys like Martin Van Buren (democrat) literally sold the federal government’s tool supply so that the government could not use the tools for public works projects. It's like the exact opposite of Obama's reaction.

    Just look at the stances of Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland in their platforms for their parties.

    Then it was kinda central for both parties for a while. Depending on what one party wanted the opposite party might lean a bit against that. Now Republicans are clearly to the right, and Democrats clearly to the left. The days of a Dixiecrat or Rockefeller Republican are over.

    Look at this presidential platform.

    Support of a partisan program to provide federal assistance for low income communities
    Extend Social Security to 10 million more workers and benefits hikes for 6.5 million Americans
    Provide asylum for thousands of refugees, expellees and displaced persons
    Raise the minimum wage and extend minimum-wage protections to as many more workers as is possible and practicable.
    Bring unemployment insurance to 4 million additional workers
    Protect the right of workers to organize into unions and to bargain collectively
    Fight to protect equal pay for equal work regardless of sex.


    Those are some of the key parts of President Eisenhowers platform. His Democratic opponent was more based on fighting communism with a stronger national defense. Opposing tax loopholes and sales tax. Using military strength to keep the peace abroad, keep gov't expenditures to the lowest possible level. Protect agriculture in the US, help small businesses, protect free enterprise, privatize social programs, improve veterans benefits...
     
  10. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    53,246
    Thanks Received:
    9,190
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +36,010


    Which is why they are so eager to get rid of statues of democrat soldiers who owned and fought to keep slaves....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page