The defect of the (parasite) progressive's thinking on Corporations

It's even more amusing how lazy CON$ervoFascist slackers, who don't have two pennies to rub together, pretend to be more financially successful then the so called "Limousine Liberals." :rofl:


Wait.... I thought you dumbasses said the Repubs had all the money.

I mean dont they have all those evil capitalists keeping them rich?



:lol:
No it's CON$ who claim Republicans have all the money.

CON$ claim at the same time that "Welfare Queen" "Limousine Liberals" have no money at all and are the wealthiest people on Earth, depending on which day of the week it is. :cuckoo:

Did you forget to take your meds?

That makes no sense at all.

Or maybe its me who needs to take some meds, b/c this is just too much.

All day I hear about how the GOP is all about the rich, meanwhile Al gore is swimming in money from the global warming scam, Bawney Fwank is helping all his banker buddies, John Kerry has his sugar momma, Nancy has her own personal Air Force planes, and you want to tell me that the GOP is :cuckoo: ?

I personally hope everybody has a chance to get rich, but I dont want to demonize those who are already there.... MOST of them earned it the honest way.

I will let the law and the good Lord above deal with the rest of em.
 
It's amusing how liberal government leeches, who don't have two nickles to rub together, give us lessons on business administration.


~Mark [/SIZE]

Wait.... I thought you dumbasses said the Repubs had all the money.

I mean dont they have all those evil capitalists keeping them rich?



:lol:
No it's CON$ who claim Republicans have all the money.

CON$ claim at the same time that "Welfare Queen" "Limousine Liberals" have no money at all and are the wealthiest people on Earth, depending on which day of the week it is. :cuckoo:

Did you forget to take your meds?

That makes no sense at all.

Or maybe its me who needs to take some meds, b/c this is just too much.

All day I hear about how the GOP is all about the rich, meanwhile Al gore is swimming in money from the global warming scam, Bawney Fwank is helping all his banker buddies, John Kerry has his sugar momma, Nancy has her own personal Air Force planes, and you want to tell me that the GOP is :cuckoo: ?

I personally hope everybody has a chance to get rich, but I dont want to demonize those who are already there.... MOST of them earned it the honest way.

I will let the law and the good Lord above deal with the rest of em.
Nothing CON$ claim makes sense.

You and Mark prove my point. One says Libs are gov leeches and the other says they are swimming in money.

Only CON$ are allowed to demonize the rich, as you just showed, but only if they are Dems. Only CON$ have earned their money honestly, Libs got theirs from scams.

October 6, 2010
Making Complex Understandable: On the Rich Versus the Wealthy
RUSH: This term rich is used to encompass and include way, way, way too many people, and it is done to the benefit of the Democrat Party because there's well-to-do, there's rich, there's upper middle class, there's filthy rich, there's wealthy, there's the idle wealthy, and then there is the elite blue-bloods who inherited great fortunes.* And remember, behind every fortune is a great crime.* But that's a subject for another day.
 
Here is a link to the entire transcript, since you won't get it if you rely on the person with the depth and usefulness of a puddle of piss who posted the snippet.

Making Complex Understandable: On the Rich Versus the Wealthy

And the rest of the quote, which makes it clear who is Rush is talking about.

This is where Obama's gone off the rails. This is where he is a jackass, an ignoramus on economics and particularly capitalism. And I do believe both. I believe he is an ignoramus on capitalism and is also purposely destroying capitalism, and I think the two go hand in hand. The only reason you'd want to destroy capitalism is if you've been lied to about how unfair, unjust, and immoral it is. And I believe he has been maleducated, ill-educated, he has been lied to by a bunch of angry people his whole life who turned him into an angry person, and who believe that the ills of this world are rooted in capitalism. I mean it's right out of the Engels and Marx belief system.
 
October 6, 2010
Making Complex Understandable: On the Rich Versus the Wealthy
RUSH: This term rich is used to encompass and include way, way, way too many people, and it is done to the benefit of the Democrat Party because there's well-to-do, there's rich, there's upper middle class, there's filthy rich, there's wealthy, there's the idle wealthy, and then there is the elite blue-bloods who inherited great fortunes.* And remember, behind every fortune is a great crime.* But that's a subject for another day.
That Rush Limbaugh quote was said to lampoon liberals.

Here is a link to the entire transcript, since you won't get it if you rely on the person with the depth and usefulness of a puddle of piss who posted the snippet.

Making Complex Understandable: On the Rich Versus the Wealthy

And the rest of the quote, which makes it clear who is Rush is talking about.

This is where Obama's gone off the rails. This is where he is a jackass, an ignoramus on economics and particularly capitalism. And I do believe both. I believe he is an ignoramus on capitalism and is also purposely destroying capitalism, and I think the two go hand in hand. The only reason you'd want to destroy capitalism is if you've been lied to about how unfair, unjust, and immoral it is. And I believe he has been maleducated, ill-educated, he has been lied to by a bunch of angry people his whole life who turned him into an angry person, and who believe that the ills of this world are rooted in capitalism. I mean it's right out of the Engels and Marx belief system.
Thank you for showing what a raving lunatic Stuttering LimpTard THE Jackass is!!!

Now the context I posted the quote was the poster I was replying to accused Libs of "demonizing the rich" after he just finished demonizing rich Libs so I pointed out that hypocritical CON$ have no problem demonizing the rich when the rich are Liberals, and your snippet does nothing to change that fact. But it does show how insane your MessiahRushie is, so thank you again.

BTW, the real context of his rant was that the truly wealthy will be able to avoid any tax increase from the scheduled Bush tax increases because "the tax code is not multiple thousands of pages for no reason," a theme he has hit on many times before. Reread his title for the rant again.

His foaming at the mouth about Obama was just his obsessive jealousy of Obama seeping through. His insane jealousy of Obama seeps into every one of his mindless rants, he is incapable of stopping it from happening. You have to understand that Obama lives rent free in LimpTard's perverted mind.

October 6, 2010
Making Complex Understandable: On the Rich Versus the Wealthy
RUSH: * But here's the dirty little secret, and this is what Obama and his little gang of Marxist socialists do not understand, and they never will understand, they won't understand it while it's happening right before their very eyes.* The thing that they don't get is how industrious and clever, creative, and entrepreneurish, productive Americans can be, particularly in coming up with legal tax avoidance plans.* That tax code isn't multiple thousands of pages for no reason.

Now, we're talking about the wealthy here, folks.*
* We're not talking on the $250,000 or $500,000 a year people.* They're not going to have access to that multiple thousands of page tax code.* They're earning wages.* They have income.* Income taxes, there aren't a whole lot of shelters anymore, and that's not the people we're talking about.*
 
the economy is a facility of society. a capitalist economy at once promotes health and prosperity in society while feeding off of this health and prosperity. this is why regulation/legislation and tax/expenditure done right empowers corporations.

the bottom line is that perceiving corporations as the kings of economic prosperity is plain stupidity. these corporations, like my own, owe their economic prosperity to their customers.
 
Except that the US is 0% capitalist. There are absolutely no free markets in the US, a prerequisite for capitalism to exist.
this is nonesense. the only prerequisite to capitalism is private ownership of the means of production. free markets as defined today are a fallacy in my view, anyhow.

the US is capitalistic up to the rate of tax burden, because of the implication tax has to ownership of the means whereby revenue is obtained. that's the way i'd try to put a % on the matter, at least.

edit: about 50% - 70%??? maybe inflation is relevant, but it hurts my head to imagine how.
 
Last edited:
The wealth of corporations is unparallelled, except perhaps, some governments. For the (parasite) progressive, it's the goose that lays the golden egg. Profits mean tax revenue, contributions to "infrastructure" that would be unachievable without the voluntary collectivism of the corporation, yielding far more wealth than its parts alone.

But the (parasite) progressive wants to kill corporations? Why?

Only reason I can think of is they think they can replace the abundance of the voluntary collectivism of the corporation with their own, failed compusory collectivism.

They hate them because they work.

Your think piece is based on a couple givens that you expect your readers to accept as truth without question

For examples:

But the (parasite) progressive wants to kill corporations?

Do they?

They hate them because they work

Do they?

How do you know these things?

Can you prove it?
 
Last edited:
They hate them because they work.

idiot.

bill and melinda gates
warren buffet

liberals...

nah, they don't earn any money.

you are proving yourself even more useless than expected.

You've probably named the two liberal CEOs in America. Remember John Mackey? CEO of Whole Foods. HE was a liberal icon until he proposed health care reform that didnt involve a gov't takeover of the system. Then he was scum, attacked relentlessly by the Left.
You are more incoherent than usual.

That's funny coming from you.... mr. 'the facts don't matter'. :cuckoo:

there are more liberal CEO's. But I'll grant you that more are rightwingers because they're corporatists and benefit from a corporatist agenda.

however, you're a liar when you say liberals hate people who work. that's one of your more stupid statements. because in the next breath, i'll wager that you'll call liberals 'elitists' and talk about harvard liberals.

then you'll talk about 'rich trial lawyers'...

and spoiled rich limosine liberals.

so why don't you just admit you're jealous of people who are educated and successful.

it's a pity... you actually seem to have a brain somewhere in there.... a deceptive, propagandist, lying rightwingnuttilcious type brain, but a brain nonetheless. pity you don't use it to make an honest argument instead of making yourself sound like a hack.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top