The debt and foreign policy

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Kevin_Kennedy, Jun 10, 2011.

  1. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    18,020
    Thanks Received:
    1,612
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    So we know that conservatives are worried about the debt and our profligate spending, but we also know that many conservatives support our continued military involvement around the world. So my question is how can we honestly address the debt and maintain our current foreign policy? Obviously we know that conservatives would like to "reform" or end entitlement programs, but that's only one portion of the problem. So what would conservatives on USMB change about our foreign policy, if anything, to try to help reign in the debt?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. sparky
    Offline

    sparky VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,329
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    paradise
    Ratings:
    +350
    well, first off, how is anything with as much collusion as our foriegn policy going to assume some sort of 'honest' approach when so many biased entites are all about their own self enlightened interests KK?
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2011
  3. Richard-H
    Online

    Richard-H Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,211
    Thanks Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,151
    I'm not a conservative, but I suggest a simple solution for dealing with our debt:

    Give Alaska to the Chinese.

    First, it would settle our debt with the Chinese.

    Second, we could let the Russians & the Chinese could fight out who owns it after that and just sit back and watch.

    Third, and best of all, Sarah Palin goes with it!
     
  4. sparky
    Offline

    sparky VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,329
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    paradise
    Ratings:
    +350
    and the Ruskies would kill for Palin>
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    18,020
    Thanks Received:
    1,612
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    One could say the same of anything government does. The question, however, is what would you do, assuming you could do anything.
     
  6. Wacky Quacky
    Offline

    Wacky Quacky Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    337
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +421
    I don't understand how Republicans can justify keeping every foreign military base open. It costs us over 600 billion a year and serves no purpose. There is a tiny shred of validity to continuing the wars, but the foreign military bases seem like a no brainer.
     
  7. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    18,020
    Thanks Received:
    1,612
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    How much have the wars cost us? Not that that cost is actually on the books. I'm not sure about the validity of continuing these wars if you're serious about dealing with the debt.
     
  8. Wacky Quacky
    Offline

    Wacky Quacky Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    337
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +421
    I'm all for ending the wars too.

    The argument comes from whether or not Iraq and Afghanistan will devolve into chaos once we leave. Personally, I don't give a shit about those countries. Our troops and national solvency are more important to me than some moronic backwards ass countries.
     
  9. Flopper
    Offline

    Flopper Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    17,170
    Thanks Received:
    3,048
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Washington
    Ratings:
    +6,437
    The foreign policy question that needs to be answered is , should the United States continue to be the policeman of the world? Should we go to war to protect American interest abroad? If the answer to these questions are yes, then we have no choice but to maintain a large military and fight endless wars around the world.

    The alternative is do what most other countries in world do. Protect their boarders and stay out of the business of other countries.
     
  10. Wacky Quacky
    Offline

    Wacky Quacky Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    337
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +421
    Both are a double edged sword. By protecting our interests we create hatred and contempt towards us. It was one of Osama Bin Laden's driving forces.

    Conversely, if we do nothing then we leave our interests abroad up the winds of fate. That is, unless we get off our lazy asses and secure alternative means to fulfill our interests locally.
     

Share This Page