The debates

Discussion in 'Israel and Palestine' started by P F Tinmore, Apr 26, 2017.

  1. RoccoR
    Offline

    RoccoR Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    9,241
    Thanks Received:
    2,308
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Reynoldsburg, OH
    Ratings:
    +6,025
    RE: The debates
    ⁜→ toobfreak, ForeverYoung436, P F Tinmore, et al,

    To best describe the Arab Palestinians one has to understand → a psychological problem that runs rampant in depressed territories and regions. They are a population of “politically effected long-termers” in in the depressed territories and regions. It is a population that is familiar with the technology that is updated, but beyond them in terms of the impact both socially and pschologically. They are unable to adapt in terms of social, economic and political policies; much of which is tribal and outdated.

    (COMMENT)

    Most of the Arab Palestinian legacy beliefs of today are actually scwabbles held over from Lost Generation (a Gertrude Stein term), born 1883 and 1900. The Arab Palestinians were never able to push past the era of the Greatest Generation (born ≈ 1901 to 1927) and through the The Silent Generation, The Baby Boomers (Korean, Viet Nam, both Gulf Wars, Afghanistan and the Conflicts in the darker places like Somalia and Yemen), Generation X, The Millennials, and into today's Generation Z'ers. Less than 10% of today's Arab Palestinian population was alive during the lifetime of Albert Einstien (1879-1955) and Neils Bohr (1885-1962) contemplated the inner workings and hidden mechanism of those great men (BTW: Both had at least one Jewish Parent - and - both had are Nobel Laureates.). OH! The Arab Palestinians know how to use today's technology but have no experience and made no real contribution to the development of these wonders or today's technology.

    The Arab Palestinians generally have no respect due to all fellow sentient beings (especially the Jewish), and kill on the basis of a sense of entitlement and issues that were determined more than half a century ago, and before the creation of a Palestinian State.

    The Arab Palestinians expect a reward for something they did not earn, yet want surrendered to them. None, I repeat, none of the Arab Palestinians were alive to remember a time when their generation established sovereignty, let alone during any time in which some generation defended their sovereignty.

    AND, the Arab Palestinians of today were never alive in a time when they politically accept the consequences of their actions or respected the international laws protecting life.

    Just My Thought →
    Most Respectfully,
    R
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. ILOVEISRAEL
    Offline

    ILOVEISRAEL Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    3,732
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +1,911
    If the U.S. were “ neutral “ what would be the outcome? It would be “ nothing “ like it is now
     
  3. P F Tinmore
    Offline

    P F Tinmore Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    55,502
    Thanks Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +5,892
    :laugh::laugh::laugh: Where do you get this shit? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
     
  4. P F Tinmore
    Offline

    P F Tinmore Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    55,502
    Thanks Received:
    2,178
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +5,892
    :boohoo::boohoo::boohoo:
     
  5. Hollie
    Offline

    Hollie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    33,065
    Thanks Received:
    2,889
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +10,989
    The usual cartoons that define your ability to respond.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. RoccoR
    Offline

    RoccoR Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    9,241
    Thanks Received:
    2,308
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Reynoldsburg, OH
    Ratings:
    +6,025
    ⁜→ toobfreak, ForeverYoung436, P F Tinmore, et al,

    Well, it is a good question (Neutral or non-neutral), but more a very low probability for any nation that has the political influence of a super-power (commercial, industrial, economic, military or political). And at the top of the pyramid, the more likely a superpower might have multiple measures of influence.

    (COMMENT)

    Counter-Question: Do you really think that a country like the US could be "neutral" on any major issue that might have a significant influence on a fragile regional stability issue? (RHETORICAL) Certainly, you can see that the Middle East Quartet [the United Nations (Biased towards the Arab Palestinians), the United States (Biased towards the Israelis), the European Union (Biased towards the Arab Palestinians), and the Russian Federation (biased towards the Arab Palestinians)] each having its own bias and influence and pressure they bring to the table and can bring to bear. Even the People's Republic of China (another world power biased towards the Arab Palestinians) has a hat in the ring and floated a peace initiative [known as the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) vision] for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and settlement.

    A: If in such of an event → then yes, the world would once again write yet another chapter on the continuing saga and persecution → of the Jewish People under some re-worked version of history and done under the appearance of legal authority, when in fact, no such right or authority exists. This is an ongoing attempt to recraft the meaning of certain laws and suggesting certain agreements make the State of Israel somehow an invalid creation through self-determination. ​

    Most Respectfully,
    R
     
  7. Natural Citizen
    Offline

    Natural Citizen Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    7,849
    Thanks Received:
    1,802
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Ratings:
    +7,125
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. RoccoR
    Offline

    RoccoR Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Messages:
    9,241
    Thanks Received:
    2,308
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Reynoldsburg, OH
    Ratings:
    +6,025
    RE: The debates
    ⁜→ Natural Citizen, et al,

    I was born in Pittsburgh myself. I find it hard to criticize a homeboy.

    (COMMENT)

    Under the Ron Paul philosophy, the US can never go back and correct its mistakes or try a solution or mitigate the effects. We cannot even try to make things right, as we perceive "right" today. If you believe that, then you must also concede that Israel cannot go back and render what was once done wrong and attempt to make it right. Things like reconciliations, settlements payments, reparations and alike are not in your playbook. You should just fold your arms and do nothing.

    Most Respectfully,
    R
     
  9. danielpalos
    Offline

    danielpalos Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    53,590
    Thanks Received:
    1,130
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +8,182
    We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.

    A warfare-State economy on a for-profit basis should be considered immoral. Even the Nazis had better morals concerning a warfare-State economy:

     
  10. rylah
    Offline

    rylah Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Messages:
    9,600
    Thanks Received:
    1,506
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +5,910
    Who said there's no interest solving it?
    And what modern state doesn't profit from its military industry?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1

Share This Page