Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Progressive-Totalitarians can't handle the truth.
But that isn't going to deter either Willow or me from speaking up.
What is the truth?
That the FDA removed the indication for Avastin for breast cancer because of the cost?
I've heard people mention that on here, but I have not seen any PROOF for that accusation.
Last week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revoked its regulatory approval of the drug Avastin to treat late stage, metastatic breast cancer. Each year, the practicing oncologists chosen by 17,500 American women to save them from their life-threatening, heavily progressed cancer prescribe Avastin to treat them.
The FDA explained that it was revoking approval of the drug for that use because it decided that the drug does not provide "a sufficient benefit in slowing disease progression to outweigh the significant risk to patients." Risk? The drug is prescribed for women who are otherwise going to die from cancer unless the drug saves them at least for a time. The far greater risk to these women is from the FDA, not the drug.
As The Wall Street Journal said last Friday in response to the FDA's explanation:
Ponder that [word] "sufficient." The agency is substituting its own judgment about clinical meaningfulness for those of practicing oncologists and terminally ill cancer patients.
The American Spectator : The Death Panel's First Murder
way to go dems. some snatching victory,, reach around and give yourselves a good pat on the back.
We've already covered this in depth.
You have proven yourself unqualified to discuss this topic as you have clearly been lead down the path of fear by a biased opinion blog that does not base their writing on facts.
We've already covered this in depth.
You have proven yourself unqualified to discuss this topic as you have clearly been lead down the path of fear by a biased opinion blog that does not base their writing on facts.
she thinks if she repeats the same trash often enough, that somehow makes it true.
Last week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revoked its regulatory approval of the drug Avastin to treat late stage, metastatic breast cancer. Each year, the practicing oncologists chosen by 17,500 American women to save them from their life-threatening, heavily progressed cancer prescribe Avastin to treat them.
The FDA explained that it was revoking approval of the drug for that use because it decided that the drug does not provide "a sufficient benefit in slowing disease progression to outweigh the significant risk to patients." Risk? The drug is prescribed for women who are otherwise going to die from cancer unless the drug saves them at least for a time. The far greater risk to these women is from the FDA, not the drug.
As The Wall Street Journal said last Friday in response to the FDA's explanation:
Ponder that [word] "sufficient." The agency is substituting its own judgment about clinical meaningfulness for those of practicing oncologists and terminally ill cancer patients.
The American Spectator : The Death Panel's First Murder
way to go dems. some snatching victory,, reach around and give yourselves a good pat on the back.
We've already covered this in depth.
You have proven yourself unqualified to discuss this topic as you have clearly been lead down the path of fear by a biased opinion blog that does not base their writing on facts.
So! State the facts man. State em.
Cancer specialists said this week that Avastin never lived up to its initial promise
We've already covered this in depth.
You have proven yourself unqualified to discuss this topic as you have clearly been lead down the path of fear by a biased opinion blog that does not base their writing on facts.
she thinks if she repeats the same trash often enough, that somehow makes it true.
The truth is what then? And while yer at it would you explain the waivers please?
We've already covered this in depth.
You have proven yourself unqualified to discuss this topic as you have clearly been lead down the path of fear by a biased opinion blog that does not base their writing on facts.
So! State the facts man. State em.
I already did, and so did he in another thread. The drug did not do what they said it would do, it has life threatening side effects with little results.
Here is one of the quotes from what I already posted.
Cancer specialists said this week that Avastin never lived up to its initial promise
So! State the facts man. State em.
I already did, and so did he in another thread. The drug did not do what they said it would do, it has life threatening side effects with little results.
Here is one of the quotes from what I already posted.
Cancer specialists said this week that Avastin never lived up to its initial promise
what's more life threatening than cancer? oh, that's right demonRats.
what's more life threatening than cancer? oh, that's right demonRats.
So! State the facts man. State em.
I already did, and so did he in another thread. The drug did not do what they said it would do, it has life threatening side effects with little results.
Here is one of the quotes from what I already posted.
Cancer specialists said this week that Avastin never lived up to its initial promise
what's more life threatening than cancer? oh, that's right demonRats.
I already did, and so did he in another thread. The drug did not do what they said it would do, it has life threatening side effects with little results.
Here is one of the quotes from what I already posted.
what's more life threatening than cancer? oh, that's right demonRats.
do you think avastin would save the life of a breast cancer patient?
what's more life threatening than cancer? oh, that's right demonRats.
do you think avastin would save the life of a breast cancer patient?
That FDA judgment was determined last summer by an internal agency panel of 13 experts, only two of whom were breast cancer oncologists, and none of whom were breast cancer patients.
Was this the same bunch of dunderheads who decided that women didn't need yearly mammograms? Yes, I trust these mother fuckers implicityly.
do you think avastin would save the life of a breast cancer patient?
That FDA judgment was determined last summer by an internal agency panel of 13 experts, only two of whom were breast cancer oncologists, and none of whom were breast cancer patients.
Was this the same bunch of dunderheads who decided that women didn't need yearly mammograms? Yes, I trust these mother fuckers implicityly.
only two breast cancer oncologists?
how did they vote?
NO PATIENTS?
lol, willow, seriously.
Brewer 'Death Panels'? - Fox News Video - FoxNews.com
The first Death Panel victim was in "Arizona". Here is Republican Gov. Brewer dancing around that fact.
That FDA judgment was determined last summer by an internal agency panel of 13 experts, only two of whom were breast cancer oncologists, and none of whom were breast cancer patients.
Was this the same bunch of dunderheads who decided that women didn't need yearly mammograms? Yes, I trust these mother fuckers implicityly.
only two breast cancer oncologists?
how did they vote?
NO PATIENTS?
lol, willow, seriously.
I can only tell you what I know. Let's hear from the Doctors who prescribe the stuff. Let's see the FDA's data on it's position. I'm looking for it. obie wan cares for the poor, he takes one jet and his wifey gets her own jet, fuck those carbon footprints. Do I sound as if I don't trust what demonRats say? Why yes, I guess I do
Let's hear from the Doctors who prescribe the stuff.
only two breast cancer oncologists?
how did they vote?
NO PATIENTS?
lol, willow, seriously.
I can only tell you what I know. Let's hear from the Doctors who prescribe the stuff. Let's see the FDA's data on it's position. I'm looking for it. obie wan cares for the poor, he takes one jet and his wifey gets her own jet, fuck those carbon footprints. Do I sound as if I don't trust what demonRats say? Why yes, I guess I do
i can tell that you don't know much.
try to keep the political bullshit about the demonrats out of this if you are seriously interested.
you even added moar shit. fuck.
this is not about obama.
