Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was 64F here today. The roses are still in bloom. When I was a girl, this part of the world was a deep freeze from November 1 until about mid April. If this is global warming, I like it. I can remember freezing my butt off even in a hooded car coat while I waited for the school bus in the winter.
It was 64F here today. The roses are still in bloom. When I was a girl, this part of the world was a deep freeze from November 1 until about mid April. If this is global warming, I like it. I can remember freezing my butt off even in a hooded car coat while I waited for the school bus in the winter.
Yep! Warmer is better! Enjoy it while it lasts!
I didn't realize East Anglia University had a monopoly on the scientific consensus of climate change.
It would be nice if this could be tracked back to more than just an anonymous blogger's page and it was more then selected passages from "5000" e-mails.
The emails show pretty categorically that the CRU is the nexus for the fraud. It is amazing that Mann, Jones, Trenberth, and Briffa have been able to co-opt the science of climatology and pervert it to their ends. They have done immeasurable damage to science in general and have pretty much discredited climatology as a science. It will take decades to rehabilitate it's status as a science, if it ever does.
They were open about what they were doing only in emails amongst themselves. They certainly never intended their methods of manipulation of data and the bastardization of the peer-review process to become public knowledge.Pretty much most AGW theory is based upon the data provided by East Anglia. Much of which is now being shown to be manipulated for political purpose. (for the second time)Climategate 2? More UEA hacked emails - Telegraph
This might help, the Telegraph is usually reasonably unbiased - although as a source it is right leaning.
The University of East Anglia doesn't have a monopoly on anything... it is, however, a key part of the international research into climate change.
If it was, it's merely a reaction to rampant politicization by skeptics/deniers. These are scientists, not politicians. That's the only reason they were more open about what they're doing, than the kind of seasoned politcal pros their adversaries are employing. I doubt the skeptic think tanks would want their private emails read for political content. Now that WOULD BE revealing!!!
There is no worldwide consensus on AGW.I didn't realize East Anglia University had a monopoly on the scientific consensus of climate change.
It would be nice if this could be tracked back to more than just an anonymous blogger's page and it was more then selected passages from "5000" e-mails.
The emails show pretty categorically that the CRU is the nexus for the fraud. It is amazing that Mann, Jones, Trenberth, and Briffa have been able to co-opt the science of climatology and pervert it to their ends. They have done immeasurable damage to science in general and have pretty much discredited climatology as a science. It will take decades to rehabilitate it's status as a science, if it ever does.
Oh my, a few nefarious scientists have made the whole of the world's scientific establishment toe their mark!
Do you realize just how fucking dumb that sounds, Walleyes? Trying to get a consensus from a group of scientists where there is any doubt at all on a subject is like tryint to herd cats. The reason there is a worldwide consensus on AGW is that the evidence is overwhelming. Lie about it all you please, the Earth is rapidly warming, and will continue to do so for at least several decades. If we continue as we are doing, it will be millenia.
Global warming is a fact. However, no one has proven that man is causing it. And those who try lay the guilt at the door of the US. BUT I've been to China, where the pollution is so bad you can barely breathe. China is a coal rich country an they are not going to give it up. But when they do, they will be posed to buy every cent worth of oil and nautural gas. And where will that leave the US? China can send the US back to the stone age now if she wants. But there are peope in the US who would do it this second.
A coming ice age? So what? If man IS destroying mother earth, and I can believe man is very damaging to her, but if mand IS TRULY destroying mother earth, a coming ice age is just her way of reclaiming and healing herself. People have lived in the ice before, they will again.
A coming ice age? Not nearly so fearsome as the present dark age.
Global warming is a fact. However, no one has proven that man is causing it. And those who try lay the guilt at the door of the US. BUT I've been to China, where the pollution is so bad you can barely breathe. China is a coal rich country an they are not going to give it up. But when they do, they will be posed to buy every cent worth of oil and nautural gas. And where will that leave the US? China can send the US back to the stone age now if she wants. But there are peope in the US who would do it this second.
A coming ice age? So what? If man IS destroying mother earth, and I can believe man is very damaging to her, but if mand IS TRULY destroying mother earth, a coming ice age is just her way of reclaiming and healing herself. People have lived in the ice before, they will again.
A coming ice age? Not nearly so fearsome as the present dark age.
I agree with you right up 'tll you think an ice age isn't as bad as what is happening now. When the next ice age comes you will see the end of civilisation and the death of billions of people within a year. It will be human misery on a scale only equalled by the governments of China under Mao and the USSR under Stalin.
Global warming is a fact. However, no one has proven that man is causing it. And those who try lay the guilt at the door of the US. BUT I've been to China, where the pollution is so bad you can barely breathe. China is a coal rich country an they are not going to give it up. But when they do, they will be posed to buy every cent worth of oil and nautural gas. And where will that leave the US? China can send the US back to the stone age now if she wants. But there are peope in the US who would do it this second.
A coming ice age? So what? If man IS destroying mother earth, and I can believe man is very damaging to her, but if mand IS TRULY destroying mother earth, a coming ice age is just her way of reclaiming and healing herself. People have lived in the ice before, they will again.
A coming ice age? Not nearly so fearsome as the present dark age.
I agree with you right up 'tll you think an ice age isn't as bad as what is happening now. When the next ice age comes you will see the end of civilisation and the death of billions of people within a year. It will be human misery on a scale only equalled by the governments of China under Mao and the USSR under Stalin.
It will not be the death of people who know how to survive. So, sadly, since that is most people on earth, your scenario will be correct. But the earth will survive and heal herself, mankind will go on.
No, no, Sunshine. If the Kyoto Accords taught us anything, it's that only CO2 emitted by Western nations is harmful. All other CO2 is harmless and innocent.Global warming is a fact. However, no one has proven that man is causing it. And those who try lay the guilt at the door of the US. BUT I've been to China, where the pollution is so bad you can barely breathe. China is a coal rich country an they are not going to give it up. But when they do, they will be posed to buy every cent worth of oil and nautural gas. And where will that leave the US? China can send the US back to the stone age now if she wants. But there are peope in the US who would do it this second.
A coming ice age? So what? If man IS destroying mother earth, and I can believe man is very damaging to her, but if mand IS TRULY destroying mother earth, a coming ice age is just her way of reclaiming and healing herself. People have lived in the ice before, they will again.
A coming ice age? Not nearly so fearsome as the present dark age.
