The Crusades and Islam Conflict -- In Five Minutes:

MikeK

Gold Member
Jun 11, 2010
15,930
2,494
290
Brick, New Jersey
Even though things presently seem relatively peaceful here in the U.S. all of the West is in serious danger. Islam is rising steadily and is fanatically dedicated to assuming control of Europe, Scandinavia, and the U.S. -- and enslaving all of its indigenous, non-Muslim inhabitants. This conflict with Islam is not new. Unfortunately we in the modern West have come to ignore a very important part of our history -- The Crusades and our violent conflict with the Middle East.

It is important that we in the West know what the Crusades were and why the conflict hasn't ended. So take five minutes to educate yourself on this critically important topic. Go here:

 
Even though things presently seem relatively peaceful here in the U.S. all of the West is in serious danger. Islam is rising steadily and is fanatically dedicated to assuming control of Europe, Scandinavia, and the U.S. -- and enslaving all of its indigenous, non-Muslim inhabitants. This conflict with Islam is not new. Unfortunately we in the modern West have come to ignore a very important part of our history -- The Crusades and our violent conflict with the Middle East.

It is important that we in the West know what the Crusades were and why the conflict hasn't ended. So take five minutes to educate yourself on this critically important topic. Go here:



Christians everywhere are also increasingly victims of Crusader Guilt taught in history courses at every level of our education systems. How many Christians on the fence in believing in the faith of their fathers or adolescent Westerners verging on adulthood have turned to atheism over hatred inspired by false narratives of the Crusades? Further, how many modern, relatively uneducated Western leaders and parliamentarians have implemented pro-Muslim biased immigration and state policies--including special political protections-- out of guilt for their ancestors so-called uncalled for "savagery" during the Crusades?

Muslims and Westerners can coexist, but only in so far as Christianity and Western traditional heritage remain the dominant culture, and Western democratic law and political theory rules the day. In Western societies Muslims must allow themselves to be assimilated into Western culture if they seek to live in peace and enjoy the benefits of Western prosperity. Anywhere in the West that allows or champions the politicization of Islam, and election of radical Islamic candidates to its public offices, will undergo complete cultural change and suffer the loss of its most sacred heritage and way of life.
 
To be fair, the First Crusade in 1095 started with Pope Urban II calling on his flock to rise up against the infidels who were living in the Holy Land (mostly Jews, Muslims, and other Xtians). So, they marched from Europe to Constantinople to take up his call.

Pausing only occasionally to wipe out some Jewish communities on the way.
 
Jews during that time period immigrated to Muslim controlled lands for protection from the hoards of Christian barbarians who slaughtered everybody who wasn't of the Catholic faith. .... :cool:
 
To be fair, the First Crusade in 1095 started with Pope Urban II calling on his flock to rise up against the infidels who were living in the Holy Land (mostly Jews, Muslims, and other Xtians). So, they marched from Europe to Constantinople to take up his call.

Pausing only occasionally to wipe out some Jewish communities on the way.
Actually it was a group (name escapes me) who were on their way to Israel, discovered they were too lazy and stopped in Spain to practice racism
 
To be fair, the First Crusade in 1095 started with Pope Urban II calling on his flock to rise up against the infidels who were living in the Holy Land (mostly Jews, Muslims, and other Xtians). So, they marched from Europe to Constantinople to take up his call.

Pausing only occasionally to wipe out some Jewish communities on the way.

During the first Crusade, as Count Emicho of Leiningen and his renegade troop of criminals raped and pillage Jewish communities along the Rhine, local bishops tried to stop them and the Church strongly condemned theirs and all other anti-Jewish violence. Attacking and plundering Jews was neither approved by the Church or the goal or policy of the majority of the Crusaders. Narrating the history of the Crusades in that light his highly misleading.

The words of St. Bernard just prior to the Second Crusade:

"Ask anyone who knows the Sacred Scriptures what he finds foretold of the Jews in the Psalm. "Not for their destruction do I pray," it says. The Jews are for us the living words of Scripture, for they remind us always of what our Lord suffered.... Under Christian princes they endure a hard captivity, but "they only wait for the time of their deliverance."
 
To be fair, the First Crusade in 1095 started with Pope Urban II calling on his flock to rise up against the infidels who were living in the Holy Land (mostly Jews, Muslims, and other Xtians). So, they marched from Europe to Constantinople to take up his call.

Pausing only occasionally to wipe out some Jewish communities on the way.
Actually it was a group (name escapes me) who were on their way to Israel, discovered they were too lazy and stopped in Spain to practice racism

The first wave of Pope Urban's Crusade, the 'People's Crusade' consisted of about 20,000 ordinary peasants led by a guy named 'Peter the Hermit' who walked from modern-day Germany through Romania and Bulgaria to arrive in Constantinople. From there, they branched off into modern day Turkey, Syria, and Israel.

The main contingent of French knights of the First Crusade, went from France through Italy and Greece to Constantinople before marching through modern day Turkey to the Holy Land.
 
Nothing says Crusaders were just nice guys out to defeat the evil Muslims like the Crusaders sacking Christian Constantinople.

Along with a few other Christian cities along the way.
 
charles_martel.JPG

This was the beginning of a counter attack against Muslim Invasion. The Battle of Tours stopped the Muslims from possibly taking all of Europe.

From that point forward......the countries finally banded to get the church to create a crusade to drive the invaders back home and retake Jerusalem.
 
Muslims wants to depict the modern-day conflicts with Christian-majority Western powers (and Russia) invading, occupying, bombing Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Chechnya, etc as 21st century crusades.

The real stupidity lies in the fact that they want to claim this is a continuum of Christian “aggression” towards the Muslim world dating back to the 11th century. In reality, even those atracks of antiquity were mere defensive actions to Islamic invasions and conquests of- what was then, 2/3 of the Christian world- which raged onwards for 400+ years before the first Crusade.

Islam is the prime enemy of Christianity, a tool of Satan dating back to its very inception. Never forget the 60 Million Christians killed by Jihad over the past 1400 years, the tens (if not 100s) of thousands of Churches destroyed/converted into mosques, the Christian lands lost or the Christians forcibly Islamized through sword and jizya. The Christian faith survives today because of Jan Sobieski, Charles Martel and countless other heroes. The British and French dismantling of the Ottoman caliphate is the root cause of Muslim hostility in the modern era!
 
Even though things presently seem relatively peaceful here in the U.S. all of the West is in serious danger. Islam is rising steadily and is fanatically dedicated to assuming control of Europe, Scandinavia, and the U.S. -- and enslaving all of its indigenous, non-Muslim inhabitants. This conflict with Islam is not new. Unfortunately we in the modern West have come to ignore a very important part of our history -- The Crusades and our violent conflict with the Middle East.

It is important that we in the West know what the Crusades were and why the conflict hasn't ended. So take five minutes to educate yourself on this critically important topic. Go here:




"Islam is rising steadily ... This conflict with Islam is not new ..."




"So take five minutes to educate yourself on this critically important topic: (The Crusades and our violent conflict with the Middle East.)"






I know I don’t need that long [5 minutes]





“Government forces in Afghanistan managed to free 149 people-- including women and children--who were abducted by the Taliban just hours earlier in the province of Kunduz . . . . There was no comment from the Taliban but the area of the incident is under Taliban control.”




God Help Us All
 
charles_martel.JPG

This was the beginning of a counter attack against Muslim Invasion. The Battle of Tours stopped the Muslims from possibly taking all of Europe.

From that point forward......the countries finally banded to get the church to create a crusade to drive the invaders back home and retake Jerusalem.

'retake Jerusalem'

I just find that amusing- because none of the European countries invading had ever 'owned' Jerusalem.

I absolutely agree that the Crusades were the result of the Muslim invasions and the European invasion of the Middle East were just as 'justified' as any other invasions of the era- but the French and English and German crusaders viewed the Byzantines as being almost as foreign as the Muslims- and didn't invade Jerusalem to return it to the Byzantines who had owned it 500 years before.

And by the way- the story of ISIS and the other Muslim extremists who want to portray the modern world as part of the Crusades is idiotic also.
 
charles_martel.JPG

This was the beginning of a counter attack against Muslim Invasion. The Battle of Tours stopped the Muslims from possibly taking all of Europe.

From that point forward......the countries finally banded to get the church to create a crusade to drive the invaders back home and retake Jerusalem.

'retake Jerusalem'

I just find that amusing- because none of the European countries invading had ever 'owned' Jerusalem.

I absolutely agree that the Crusades were the result of the Muslim invasions and the European invasion of the Middle East were just as 'justified' as any other invasions of the era- but the French and English and German crusaders viewed the Byzantines as being almost as foreign as the Muslims- and didn't invade Jerusalem to return it to the Byzantines who had owned it 500 years before.

And by the way- the story of ISIS and the other Muslim extremists who want to portray the modern world as part of the Crusades is idiotic also.
All maps on Earth are from war.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top