The coup by the U.S. disguised as humanitarian efforts towards Venezuela

Hospital in Colombia.

53496287_1495830713887048_153561753895043072_n.jpg
 
''same old'' ?? name some imperial ''takeovers'' [ hahaha ] since 1975
Most of Central and South America; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

Surely you aren't going to make an idiot of yourself by pretending we are promoting humanitarian efforts. The people do not want us there. The Right wing candidate was not legally elected. They don't even know who he is. The U.S. elected him,not the people.
you just made an idiot of yourself--most of those are pre-1975
AND--you don't even know the meaning of your own OP words
im·pe·ri·al
Dictionary result for imperial
/imˈpirēəl/
adjective
  1. 1.
    relating to an empire.
Pre- 1975 is still going on today. Your point is totally moot. We are conquerors of nations and their resources, disguised as humanitarians, while placing sanctions on this country, punishing them for not having the kind of government we demand, while promoting a coup. It's been our MO.
if the US wanted to, we would really takeover
we want to take resources so bad, we backed Israel NOT the oil countries!!
WE already control much of the oil flow in the ME. What do you think Iraq 1 and II were about?" Oil flow. The Bush's and Cheney made sure we locked that down.
that's why there was an oil crisis---?
https://www.history.com/topics/1970s/energy-crisis
 
Anybody with an ounce of brain matter can see there is an ongoing political coup in the U.S. but lefties worry about their socialist guy in freaking Venezuela. No surprises here.
When it is about robbing another country, dimbos and repukes suddenly form a unity. So it doesn´t wonder that Trump is just continuing Obama´s Venezuela policy.
 
Yea right. Piss in my ear and tell me it's raining. It's the same old imperial takeover by the U.S., disguised as a humanitarian effort to help the people of Venezuela. Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources. And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S. There is no humanitarian concern. If it were, we wouldn't have sanctions placed on Venezuela. We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in. The desired president of the U.S. who would hand the country over to the U.S. and its resources, who was not actually elected, need this coup to happen on behalf of the U.S. and its wealth interests. It has nothing to do with the interests of the people. And yet, we know as a country, that these imperial practices have been going on for decades by the U.S. It's about the oil, gold, and diamonds. Disgusting and chilling.
 
Most of Central and South America; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

Surely you aren't going to make an idiot of yourself by pretending we are promoting humanitarian efforts. The people do not want us there. The Right wing candidate was not legally elected. They don't even know who he is. The U.S. elected him,not the people.
you just made an idiot of yourself--most of those are pre-1975
AND--you don't even know the meaning of your own OP words
im·pe·ri·al
Dictionary result for imperial
/imˈpirēəl/
adjective
  1. 1.
    relating to an empire.
Pre- 1975 is still going on today. Your point is totally moot. We are conquerors of nations and their resources, disguised as humanitarians, while placing sanctions on this country, punishing them for not having the kind of government we demand, while promoting a coup. It's been our MO.
if the US wanted to, we would really takeover
wWhat's this have to do with us taking over oil production e want to take resources so bad, we backed Israel NOT the oil countries!!
WE already control much of the oil flow in the ME. What do you think Iraq 1 and II were about?" Oil flow. The Bush's and Cheney made sure we locked that down.
that's why there was an oil crisis---?
https://www.history.com/topics/1970s/energy-crisis
What's this have to do with taking over oil production in Venezuela? It's their country, not ours. What does our oil crisis have to do with Venezuela and their affairs?
 
Yeah, because there is no humanitarian crisis going on in Venezuela.

:disbelief::disbelief:
 
Yeah, because there is no humanitarian crisis going on in Venezuela.

:disbelief::disbelief:
The one we created, by imposing $30 million dollars worth of sanctions on Venezuela.
There IS a humanitarian crisis in Venezuela, period. I'm not interested in your opinion on how it came about. It is common knowledge that the social policies of that nation have failed dramatically and created this crisis.

/thread.
 
Yeah, because there is no humanitarian crisis going on in Venezuela.

:disbelief::disbelief:
The one we created, by imposing $30 million dollars worth of sanctions on Venezuela.
There IS a humanitarian crisis in Venezuela, period. I'm not interested in your opinion on how it came about. It is common knowledge that the social policies of that nation have failed dramatically and created this crisis.

/thread.
Lie.
 
Yea right. Piss in my ear and tell me it's raining. It's the same old imperial takeover by the U.S., disguised as a humanitarian effort to help the people of Venezuela. Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources. And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S. There is no humanitarian concern. If it were, we wouldn't have sanctions placed on Venezuela. We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in. The desired president of the U.S. who would hand the country over to the U.S. and its resources, who was not actually elected, need this coup to happen on behalf of the U.S. and its wealth interests. It has nothing to do with the interests of the people. And yet, we know as a country, that these imperial practices have been going on for decades by the U.S. It's about the oil, gold, and diamonds. Disgusting and chilling.

It doesn’t look disguised to me. It is clearly an effort by assholes in our government, to overthrow the elected government of Venezuela. Our government even backed some jackass who was not elected by the Venezulan people, demanding the elected leader resign. Not very democratic. No doubt the unelected jackass is a CIA plant, more than willing to let multinational corporations rape the country. Then use those enormous profits to continue buying corrupt American politicians.

Tried and true tactics of our criminal government, yet many Americans still don’t see it.
 
Yea right. Piss in my ear and tell me it's raining. It's the same old imperial takeover by the U.S., disguised as a humanitarian effort to help the people of Venezuela. Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources. And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S. There is no humanitarian concern. If it were, we wouldn't have sanctions placed on Venezuela. We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in. The desired president of the U.S. who would hand the country over to the U.S. and its resources, who was not actually elected, need this coup to happen on behalf of the U.S. and its wealth interests. It has nothing to do with the interests of the people. And yet, we know as a country, that these imperial practices have been going on for decades by the U.S. It's about the oil, gold, and diamonds. Disgusting and chilling.


Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources.

Wealth of resources? Chavez and Maduro were such fucktards that the country with the largest
oil reserves of any nation on the planet can barely export a million barrels of low quality oil a day.

And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S.

Yes, I blame Chavez and Maduro for the refugees from Venezuela who are heading to the US.
And the ones heading to Brazil and Colombia.

We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in.

Yes, your idiocy has sunk in.
Can you tell me if Putin will let Maduro fly to Russia before he's forced to eat a bullet?
 
you just made an idiot of yourself--most of those are pre-1975
AND--you don't even know the meaning of your own OP words
im·pe·ri·al
Dictionary result for imperial
/imˈpirēəl/
adjective
  1. 1.
    relating to an empire.
Pre- 1975 is still going on today. Your point is totally moot. We are conquerors of nations and their resources, disguised as humanitarians, while placing sanctions on this country, punishing them for not having the kind of government we demand, while promoting a coup. It's been our MO.
if the US wanted to, we would really takeover
wWhat's this have to do with us taking over oil production e want to take resources so bad, we backed Israel NOT the oil countries!!
WE already control much of the oil flow in the ME. What do you think Iraq 1 and II were about?" Oil flow. The Bush's and Cheney made sure we locked that down.
that's why there was an oil crisis---?
https://www.history.com/topics/1970s/energy-crisis
What's this have to do with taking over oil production in Venezuela? It's their country, not ours. What does our oil crisis have to do with Venezuela and their affairs?
..we backed Israel--NOT the oil countries = we don't always want resources/etc
your quote: = .
WE already control much of the oil flow in the ME. What do you think Iraq 1 and II were about?
not in the 70s we didn't
...you're jumping all over the place--first pre-1975....then post 1975 we control the oil---so why do we Venezuela??/etc?
 
Yea right. Piss in my ear and tell me it's raining. It's the same old imperial takeover by the U.S., disguised as a humanitarian effort to help the people of Venezuela. Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources. And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S. There is no humanitarian concern. If it were, we wouldn't have sanctions placed on Venezuela. We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in. The desired president of the U.S. who would hand the country over to the U.S. and its resources, who was not actually elected, need this coup to happen on behalf of the U.S. and its wealth interests. It has nothing to do with the interests of the people. And yet, we know as a country, that these imperial practices have been going on for decades by the U.S. It's about the oil, gold, and diamonds. Disgusting and chilling.


Like all South American and Central American countries, we want their wealth of resources.

Wealth of resources? Chavez and Maduro were such fucktards that the country with the largest
oil reserves of any nation on the planet can barely export a million barrels of low quality oil a day.

And then, we blame them later, as they become refugees heading to the U.S.

Yes, I blame Chavez and Maduro for the refugees from Venezuela who are heading to the US.
And the ones heading to Brazil and Colombia.

We are responsible for the very humanitarian effort we claim to want to assist with. Let that sink in.

Yes, your idiocy has sunk in.
Can you tell me if Putin will let Maduro fly to Russia before he's forced to eat a bullet?

Why liberal media is not condemning Phrump´s attack on Venezuela?

Here´s were Phrumptards and their regime and leader can go to in my opinion:
klobrstesckvv.jpg
 
The only coup being attempted is the one aimed at Trump by the Obama clowns....
 

Forum List

Back
Top