The Contiuum of Psycosis.

[NYcarbineer]

I'm still cracking over the thread title.

The what of what??

I used to be a Grammar Nazi too. But after a while I realized that it adds nothing to the conversation. I don't correct peoples speech when I'm talking to them directly, so why would I do it on a message board?

Given the OP's inability to civilly engage anyone who disagrees with her, given her propensity for snark and attempted ridicule in lieu of a cogent argument,

your sanctimony is both ironic and misplaced.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm still cracking over the thread title.

The what of what??

I used to be a Grammar Nazi too. But after a while I realized that it adds nothing to the conversation. I don't correct peoples speech when I'm talking to them directly, so why would I do it on a message board?

You got to admit it's a little perplexing..and funny all at once.

I think the thread title is the tragic consequence of PoliticalChic embarking on a dangerous voyage into the realm of original thought.

 

[Mad Scientist]

I'm still cracking over the thread title.

The what of what??

I used to be a Grammar Nazi too. But after a while I realized that it adds nothing to the conversation. I don't correct peoples speech when I'm talking to them directly, so why would I do it on a message board?

Given the OP's inability to civilly engage anyone who disagrees with her, given her propensity for snark and attempted ridicule in lieu of a cogent argument,

your sanctimony is both ironic and misplaced.

If you really believe that then why didn't you just engage her on the points in her original post? Perhaps it's because you can't?

Plus, if you know this to be true of the OP, then why do you even bother to post in her threads at all?

There's an "ignore" function on this board you know.Just use it, you'll be happier for it. (I have 3 posters on ignore)

 

[PoliticalChic]

Came across a passage about Lenin that reminded me of a connection to Obama...see if you find same:

1. In a speech delivered at the Riverside Church in New York on Human Rights Sunday, President Carter's 'golden boy,' Andrew Young said by way of explaining the famines under the Soviets:

“. . One lives in a land where, in most of that land, the sun sets as early as three o’clock in the afternoon, and where the planting season is minimal. Under those circumstances the struggle for human rights inevitably becomes far more economic in its expression than it would in a country such as ours, where we almost take it for granted that anything can grow almost anywhere year ’round.”

a. Nonsense, of course: "The rich dark soil and the vast fields of wheat and other food products have earned Ukraine the nickname "bread basket of Europe." According to the CIA World Factbook, Ukraine produced 25% of all agricultural output in the former Soviet Union. Today, Ukraine exports substantial amounts of grain, vegetables, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, milk and meat. The Bread Basket of Europe — Infoplease.com

b. Obviously, Andrew Young is not a farmer…On the other hand, one might say that the Soviet Union has endured poor weather since, roughly, October 1917.

c. One must ask why this Carter cabinet member felt it necessary to engender sympathy for the Soviets, and downplay the depredations of communism.



2. Before anyone begins to believe that the communists began their war on their own people after the Revolution, read Lenin’s embracing of the cleansing effects of famine, as far back as 1891, in order to facilitate the creation of “a new industrial proletariat which would take over from the bourgeoisie…Famine, in destroying the outdated peasant economy, would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism.” Coutois, et.al., “The Black Book of Communism,” p. 123, 124.

a. Once in power, the communists built their own famines.

So, the Soviet Communists has zero concern for lives, even the lives of their own people. Can we find similar thinking in the United States?



3. Who was personally selected by Barack Obama to be his director of Obama’s Office of Science and Technology Policy-? Our very own Lenin, John Holdren:

a. "...in Human Ecology, where Holdren and the Ehrlichs wrote: “Political pressure must be applied immediately to induce the United States government to assume its responsibility to halt the growth of the American population.”
Obama Adviser’s Green Manifesto: Americans Will Be Better Off When They Work, Produce and Earn Less - HUMAN EVENTS

b.•Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
•The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
•Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
•People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
•A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

Confederate Yankee: Obama's Science Czar Wrote Book Advocating Forced Abortions, Sterilizing Americans By Poisoning Our Drinking Water

Once a vote is cast for a leftist who would agree with and appoint a John Holdren, then one is agreeing with the same insanity that produced one hundred million deaths.


A line can be drawn in the thought processes, such as they are, from Lenin, to Carter and Andrew Young, to Obama and John Holdren.
You down with this?

Do you come across Lennin passages often? How does that happen, just comming across a Lennin passage? Did you mean to say that you were reading one of his books, or perhaps you were reading a book on communism that quoted him? It seems to me that one would have to actively look for passages by Lennin. I came across a post by Political Chic that reminded me Lennin, check out the above, see if you can find the same? Draw your own conclusions.

I do quite a bit of reading,...I recommend you try same.
Commentay magazine, "The World According to Andrew Young," by Carl Gershman.
and
Courtois, et. al., "The Black Book of Communism," p. 123,124