Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by C_Clayton_Jones, Aug 27, 2011.
More at the link:
The constitutional inevitability of same-sex marriage : SCOTUSblog
This really clears things up, then! What the hell is that supposed to mean? Vicissitudes my ass. IF I want to marry my fucking wheelbarrow, one day that is going to be “Constitutional”? Or, it isn’t. Depends. Maybe. We have this nailed down here. Thanks for the disambiguation thread, buck-o.
Back in the 60s and 70s, the left deemed marriage antiquated and passé....Now that one of the DNC's prized identity pressure groups makes a fuss, marriage is next to the gold standard of social acceptance.
Over ten percent of the population now has gay marriage available to them. Once California institutes gay marriage, we will reach a tipping point. With gay couples moving between states and the military having to extend benefits to gay couples it will only be a matter of time before courts will be overwhelmed with cases on gay marriage rights
Ten years from now, everyone will wonder what the fuss was about
California uber ales. Maybe not. Do we really Want to do this? I mean, give gays this "right"? Me personally, no. WHY? But given modern" vicissitudes" heaven knows, ANYTHING goes. To borrow a line from Broadway. Gays never hurt me. But, they never earned nor deserve the right of marriage. They have all the same rights I do, anyway, why are they bitching? NO gay marriage. No fucking way, Jose.
What did you do to earn the right to marry?
You are trying to make a point here, I suppose. I have as many rights as YOU do, no less, no more...Want a medal?
No...just trying to figure out your rambling brain farts
Rightwinger, how many guys do YOU want to marry then? Please. Don't be modest or anything. Put it out there, girlfriend! Testify!
Separate names with a comma.