Many complain that people from one part of the country, then go to other parts of the country, to help residents of that area decide who will be the area representatives(?). One person in particular thinks any election anywhere is "Rigged." Reporting that is not, "Fake News." In fact, it is in the U. S. Constitution. It's called the Electoral College!
he Electoral College is a ruse in U. S. Constitution designed to protect the rich--aka, the original Framers. The rich protected were slave-holders. An oligarchy rarely respects the will of the suppressed. The rule of any suppressed rarely respects the will of the Oligarchs. The rules of the USA are set up to protect a particular class. A broader concept of property and rights was further embraced, not just slaves.
Of itself, then notice, historically: There is nothing wrong that on its face. Go into history. The original "interest rates," usury, were "barley rates." You've been wandering around in the forest for 4.0 mil. years, living off roadkill. You see me growing and storing food. I loan you three bags of barley. You create a crop, repay me four bags, and keep and store the rest. We suddenly have a neighborhood. We have a stable supply of food. I made 33% interest, (Moslem Prohibited Wealth from Riba). I took some time off and even invented, "Barley Beer." A lot of religious folk might say that entirely is the problem(?). Historically, however, the problem with barley was the storage of it. All kinds of creatures prospered. Instead of pest control(?), silver rates became the norm, the rates were fairly stable at 20% for about 1000 years.
But wealth preservation was not entirely wrong. People did need material well-being, and after four million years, had finally thought something through. . . .some could say. Others would wonder about that.
Moses, in Deuteronomy 23:19-20, registered that the (non-existent) deity was opposed to all of that civilizing. Moses was educated of the Imperial House of Egypt, (Acts 7:22), which was denigrating, conquering, enslaving, brutalizing, and really a not-very-nice bunch of folks. In the Roman Times of New Testament, Egypt was a role model civilization. The Arts of Moses were basis religion, and widely accepted among religions.
Moses would not allow the civilizing math to be used within Israel, noted. Moses allowed that Israel could charge interest rates, and prosper without further labor: So screwing human civilizations out of what loot those civilizations had been able to store. The use of the arithmetic within Israel was prohibited. Exploiting civilizations was encouraged.
Many call that the source of Holocaust. Still, there is a concept of wealth and its preservation in play--if not a viable concept of a deity. Some Greek may have noted this to the New Testament people, or trained it in. Matthew 25:14-30, could be said a description of the recent foreclosure crisis--casting people into Outer Darkness. It is specifically usury applied, a fixed percentage for everyone. Set the story up as an upside down right triangle, and the greater religion of the Pythagoreans could apply. The household that should have been enriched 8 talents, was only enriched seven. The Square Root of Five Squared, Plus the Square Room of Five Squared: Is close enough, just possibly. Decimal points would happen 1000 years later.
In the household, those were slaves. Slavery was normal in the ancient ways of life. Moses was educated to be an enslaver. Before Moses, Code of Hammurabi allowed the sale of the wife and kids into slavery, as debt settlement device. The wife and kids got useful employment; food, clothing and shelter, and maybe education. Otherwise, it was back to the barley beer of civilization(?). . . .just being notable about our precious secular ways.
So there was a basis Welfare State. And so there was civilization being described: And with all its fake news and other kinds of concepts--and embracing material prosperity preservation.
A remedy of the excesses of wealth preservation is found in Matthew 20:1-16. Since the U. S. Constitution embraces the existence of all the bogus deity concepts, the remedy is never discussed(?). Mohammed, Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Keynes--and certainly not Nixon or Reagan--ever brought the subject to attention. Certainly the TV Evangelicals, and the Holy Fathers, and Her Majesty's Anglicans, and other Protestants: Never bring it up. Hare Krishna mainly finds the airports to be a Holy Refuge. Maybe that now includes some Amtrak terminals.
Notice how those kinds of creations tend to follow the original concept of Deuteronomy 23:19-20. Not one dime do they make. Donations they accept and spend--Catholics with use of a usury tithe.
In the remedy example, the market is provided basis currency to continue daily. Everyone freely spends the currency in any way deemed appropriate. The New Testament is of the Roman Empire times. Good or Evil actually is not involved in the concept. Imperial Rome people killed one another for sport.
Still at basis is political economy: Wealth Preservation, however, gone mad.
A price model is mostly about Hispanics--and all others--haggling in a market place. Adam Smith actually opposed simple civilizing usury, but then allowed that regulated it should be.
Politics could happen. Laissez Faire was dead on arrival.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations, follow different drummer entirely: Great Spirit, "Seven Come Eleven!")
he Electoral College is a ruse in U. S. Constitution designed to protect the rich--aka, the original Framers. The rich protected were slave-holders. An oligarchy rarely respects the will of the suppressed. The rule of any suppressed rarely respects the will of the Oligarchs. The rules of the USA are set up to protect a particular class. A broader concept of property and rights was further embraced, not just slaves.
Of itself, then notice, historically: There is nothing wrong that on its face. Go into history. The original "interest rates," usury, were "barley rates." You've been wandering around in the forest for 4.0 mil. years, living off roadkill. You see me growing and storing food. I loan you three bags of barley. You create a crop, repay me four bags, and keep and store the rest. We suddenly have a neighborhood. We have a stable supply of food. I made 33% interest, (Moslem Prohibited Wealth from Riba). I took some time off and even invented, "Barley Beer." A lot of religious folk might say that entirely is the problem(?). Historically, however, the problem with barley was the storage of it. All kinds of creatures prospered. Instead of pest control(?), silver rates became the norm, the rates were fairly stable at 20% for about 1000 years.
But wealth preservation was not entirely wrong. People did need material well-being, and after four million years, had finally thought something through. . . .some could say. Others would wonder about that.
Moses, in Deuteronomy 23:19-20, registered that the (non-existent) deity was opposed to all of that civilizing. Moses was educated of the Imperial House of Egypt, (Acts 7:22), which was denigrating, conquering, enslaving, brutalizing, and really a not-very-nice bunch of folks. In the Roman Times of New Testament, Egypt was a role model civilization. The Arts of Moses were basis religion, and widely accepted among religions.
Moses would not allow the civilizing math to be used within Israel, noted. Moses allowed that Israel could charge interest rates, and prosper without further labor: So screwing human civilizations out of what loot those civilizations had been able to store. The use of the arithmetic within Israel was prohibited. Exploiting civilizations was encouraged.
Many call that the source of Holocaust. Still, there is a concept of wealth and its preservation in play--if not a viable concept of a deity. Some Greek may have noted this to the New Testament people, or trained it in. Matthew 25:14-30, could be said a description of the recent foreclosure crisis--casting people into Outer Darkness. It is specifically usury applied, a fixed percentage for everyone. Set the story up as an upside down right triangle, and the greater religion of the Pythagoreans could apply. The household that should have been enriched 8 talents, was only enriched seven. The Square Root of Five Squared, Plus the Square Room of Five Squared: Is close enough, just possibly. Decimal points would happen 1000 years later.
In the household, those were slaves. Slavery was normal in the ancient ways of life. Moses was educated to be an enslaver. Before Moses, Code of Hammurabi allowed the sale of the wife and kids into slavery, as debt settlement device. The wife and kids got useful employment; food, clothing and shelter, and maybe education. Otherwise, it was back to the barley beer of civilization(?). . . .just being notable about our precious secular ways.
So there was a basis Welfare State. And so there was civilization being described: And with all its fake news and other kinds of concepts--and embracing material prosperity preservation.
A remedy of the excesses of wealth preservation is found in Matthew 20:1-16. Since the U. S. Constitution embraces the existence of all the bogus deity concepts, the remedy is never discussed(?). Mohammed, Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Keynes--and certainly not Nixon or Reagan--ever brought the subject to attention. Certainly the TV Evangelicals, and the Holy Fathers, and Her Majesty's Anglicans, and other Protestants: Never bring it up. Hare Krishna mainly finds the airports to be a Holy Refuge. Maybe that now includes some Amtrak terminals.
Notice how those kinds of creations tend to follow the original concept of Deuteronomy 23:19-20. Not one dime do they make. Donations they accept and spend--Catholics with use of a usury tithe.
In the remedy example, the market is provided basis currency to continue daily. Everyone freely spends the currency in any way deemed appropriate. The New Testament is of the Roman Empire times. Good or Evil actually is not involved in the concept. Imperial Rome people killed one another for sport.
Still at basis is political economy: Wealth Preservation, however, gone mad.
A price model is mostly about Hispanics--and all others--haggling in a market place. Adam Smith actually opposed simple civilizing usury, but then allowed that regulated it should be.
Politics could happen. Laissez Faire was dead on arrival.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations, follow different drummer entirely: Great Spirit, "Seven Come Eleven!")
