The Commencing Final Solution To The Presbyterian Question

[mascale]

There is, for example, the Holy Father's own Christian Hitler youth. Adam Smith was not involved.

The Republicans appear to be discontented with the pace of Bush-Paulson-Bernanke, and their Ivy League Counterpart, Bernanke-Bush-Paulson-Obama. Bernanke initially created aggressive interest rate cutting. Bush got the Stimulus rebate checks in the mail. Bernanke-Paulson engineered all the bailouts, and Obama held back on the rapid deployment of stimulus monies and programs. The Obama Administration may want to aver that it was letting the GOP racketeering play out.

Adam Smith, however, was not involved.

Laizzes faire was not involved. And so apparently now it starts to become more or less official. Discussions abound regarding what further the Obama Administration can do, and announce, pre-Holiday Season.

Possible Strategies Obama's Job Creation Plan Could Employ - CNBC

Adam Smith is not involved.

Any price model tends to rely heavily on arithmetic. The arithmetic appears on a currency, which is generated from a credit market. The currency becomes its own kind of measuring device, which is an income scale. Any market prices tend to be paid from the income scale, at the basis, human level of consumption. All economies rely on the humanity of the incomes in the scale. Government tends to back and support the currency, and including the distribution and taxation thereof.

In all of that paragraph, Adam Smith is not involved. In all of that paragraph, great social and socialist intervention is involved. In the measures that the Obama Administration could do, and which the Republicans can agree upon: Then direct public works kinds of intervention are involved, including roads and other kinds of public works. In supporting any manner of distribution of income, then Adam Smith is therefore not involved. Government policy is everywhere involved--and is heavily engaged, even in primitive economies--developed along the same lines. In the alternative economies, nothing tends to work very well at all.

In the Obama measures, (no "pun" intended, though deliberate, conscious, intent is everywhere involved, and is planned), then the refundable tax credit starts to kick in at the first part of the year. That is similar to the equal amount Bush Stimulus, and the Clinton equal amount Child Tax Credits, the 1986 U. S. federal income tax, equal amounts reform, (indexed equal amount standard deduction and personal exemptions), and the Ford Administration equal amount rebates, (Before Reagan): Then anyone sees that a lot burying of basis-free Adam Smith concepts has been underway--going onto 35 years.

Adam Smith could actually create a concept of "Laizzes Faire," even given that arithmetic is a planned, and intentional, and consciously decided human behavior.

Entire universities tend to follow along Adam Smith--and get paid a lot of currency amounts in the process.

Human beings die intentionally as a consequence: Generally having no such access to the bales and bales of currency amounts. Banks currently at least: Understand about the bales and bales of mega-bucks intended by them to be used for personal income.

And so there commences the more likely shovel ready projects, of the Final Solution To the Presbyterian Question.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Her Majesty's government, even, now famously understands about the sources and uses of credit. In fact, Her Majesty's PM led the year off with great patience, and understanding of the credit market problem--even though also in fact: Somehow there were former Colonials, in some manner otherwise engaged. The Church of all The English is, of course, Not At All To Be Said In Any Manner, Presbyterian. Economics generally, would clearly be better off: If only it could so-state!)

 

[Oddball]

Do you have access to a padded room and a good supply of Thorazine?

 

[mascale]

Dude Poster would tend to show the problem: That if in fact any arithmetic at all was ever learned, it never got applied to economics.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Exepting of course, it in fact was entirely learned, and simply not discussed--for the sundry reasons!)

 

[Oddball]

mascale the poster would tend to show the problem: If any independently verifiable facts ever applied to his posts, they would have be copied-n-pasted from somewhere else.

 

[mascale]

Dude Poster, claiming to follow mascale posts, failed to the note that the tabulation of the U. S. Credit market alone: At an excess of $50.0 tril. Federal Reserve even accounts for it in various human institutions. U. S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U. S. Department of Labor, and even the U. S. Internal Revenue Service: Tends to follow along what becomes of it all, nearly every instant of every 24 hours.

In the alternative understanding, then of course that was linked. The moderators tend to require the links.

Then anyone should be aprised that even the academic department, at Indiana University, Bloomington, now famous for Nobel Laureate, Elinor Ostrom--bonged the whole concept, 35 years ago. The Ostroms were drawing pay there, even then. There is actually more than one of them. Their surprise was that I myself was another one of someone else they knew about: Pretty much with the same name.

"Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(And even again we come to the holiday season, wherein the U. S. Nationals give to others: The food, and the blankets, and the body armor--That Americans won't keep for themselves!)

 

[Oddball]

If anything has been proven here, it's that you have zero understanding about how economics really works, Adam Smith and/or how his models relate to today (Hint: they don't, in any other way than noting that they're being ignored).

Throwing in a few links to various unrelated media sources or references to obscure economists can't mask that fact.

 

[mascale]

The big hint about Adam Smith is that the concept could never work, since basis economics was generally ignored. Elinor Ostrom also: Is of a Political Science department, and "political economy" is of more common history than is "economics."

"The Doom Coffin" is actually geometry, and is not a link. It is five-quadrant, credit-based forecasting arthmetic--against which behavior is measured.

How do humans know what they know? Usually, some quantification is involved. The problem is a "scaling" problem, which is everywhere a problem in the social sciences.

So Dude Poster, and the academic posters, fail at the understanding of "economics," clearly failing at the understanding of "scaling," in modern science. The physical sciences have similar problems, Hey Nano, Nano(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Half-Wit Father In Washington, have all kinds of scaling problems to address(?)! Banks having different scaling problem!)

 

[Neubarth]

Do you have access to a padded room and a good supply of Thorazine?

Dude, that is not fair. I have long suspected that he is nutz, so I have looked deeper into his posts, and I have found little of substance. Occasionally a rhyme and occasionally a reference to historical fact. Lets just try to make it look like he is some sort of mystery genius and let the other figure out the content of his posts. I now find them amusing.

 

[mascale]

Mortgage lenders, left to their own devices, were stroked by the "Invisible Hand," and otherwise blew it.

The "Enlightened Self-Interest" originated of direct intervention, into the profiteering market-place, created in the income scale reliant market.

Regardless if the market has been regulated or not--the profiteers have been able to blow it all along.

See, for example: Schools. Clearly, Teaching is not possible, at any grade level, without the doctoral degree: Unless it is believed some kids are better than other kids, and that all the other kids are not worth the extra effort. On the one hand, the little kids are taught by academic slime-balls. On the other hand, the most "brilliantly" educated--do wrong things, even wrongly drawing percentage adjusted pay.

California, by comparison, engineered pay cuts for UC faculty, and even yesterday for elected state officials.

Socialists have famously blown it all along, short in time frame though that has been!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Love, American-Style, is like that! Little kids get the slime-balls crap and crud, instead of the more qualified product. In the season of giving, clearly even Afghanistan will get the food, blankets and body armor: That Americans won't keep for themselves! Many will come to say, "Jesus Christ!")

 

[mascale]

Melted down coins would have to be said a non-starter, but in economics class. . . .

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Czechs," is sometimes the usual answer--to the profound Conservative, Republican, Less Government, More Defense Spending, kind of policy advocacy! "Where Does The Money Come From?" Probably guys!)