The climate crusaders say coal is dying! LOL!!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Jun 12, 2018.

  1. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    44,429
    Thanks Received:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +16,847
    A reductio ad absurdum fallacy framed on an ad hominem.
     
  2. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,074
    Thanks Received:
    1,201
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,662
    air water and soil are local..and are not climate...part of the problem with climate warriors such as yourself is that you seem to be unable, or unwilling to differentiate between climate and pollution...one is a serious problem with a solution, the other is a non problem which is sucking all the air out of the room and all the money out of the coffers which could be used to alleviate the other.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    12,074
    Thanks Received:
    1,201
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,662
    Not so absurd when coupled with the fact that you can't provide a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...that being the case, what do you suppose drives the climate "consensus" if not money?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  4. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    2,023
    Thanks Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,874
    Oh dear!

    You really have no idea what Null Hypothesis means.

    This is what I posted that you are skirting:

    "You have yet to show there is a valid climate concern.

    Do you know what the NULL hypothesis is and how it relates to Weather/Climate?"

    Warmists have failed to show that current warming rate is outside of natural variation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2018
  5. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    2,023
    Thanks Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,874
    They have IGNORED the evidence of climate models predictive failures for years now. It is clear they are captive of ecoloony propaganda.
     
  6. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    44,429
    Thanks Received:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +16,847
    Please explain that to the Inuit people and the polar bears, the inter-glacial period has lasted over 11,000 years. What changed during the last 2 centuries?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    44,429
    Thanks Received:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +16,847
    Thanks so much for sharing. Your premise, "all scientists are fakes" is more informational than you must have expected.
     
  8. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    2,023
    Thanks Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,874
    Gawad!

    Do even realize that the INTERGLACIAL period is better for them than Glaciation period?

    Polar Bears are CURRENTLY enjoying a large population growth of several decades.

    Low summer sea ice levels has little impact on Polar Bear dietary habits.

    You are so clueless.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2018
  9. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    2,023
    Thanks Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,874
    You welcome.

    I never stated or implied that "all scientists are fakes", that came from you, don't try putting words in my mouth again!

    It is a FACT that warmists do indeed ignore prediction/projections climate models failures. I have posted the evidence in the forum many times now, that gets ignored too.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2018
  10. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    31,510
    Thanks Received:
    3,617
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +12,128
    Can't answer the question what has changed in the last two centuries? I have no clue.

    What has not changed though in the last 25 years is people's total lack of interest in doing anything about climate change. It's so off people's radar it's laughable. Evidently the climate scientists have yet to make their case!:hello77:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

best cameras