Discussion in 'Environment' started by skookerasbil, Jun 12, 2018.
A reductio ad absurdum fallacy framed on an ad hominem.
air water and soil are local..and are not climate...part of the problem with climate warriors such as yourself is that you seem to be unable, or unwilling to differentiate between climate and pollution...one is a serious problem with a solution, the other is a non problem which is sucking all the air out of the room and all the money out of the coffers which could be used to alleviate the other.
Not so absurd when coupled with the fact that you can't provide a single piece of observed, measured evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...that being the case, what do you suppose drives the climate "consensus" if not money?
You really have no idea what Null Hypothesis means.
This is what I posted that you are skirting:
"You have yet to show there is a valid climate concern.
Do you know what the NULL hypothesis is and how it relates to Weather/Climate?"
Warmists have failed to show that current warming rate is outside of natural variation.
They have IGNORED the evidence of climate models predictive failures for years now. It is clear they are captive of ecoloony propaganda.
Please explain that to the Inuit people and the polar bears, the inter-glacial period has lasted over 11,000 years. What changed during the last 2 centuries?
Thanks so much for sharing. Your premise, "all scientists are fakes" is more informational than you must have expected.
Do even realize that the INTERGLACIAL period is better for them than Glaciation period?
Polar Bears are CURRENTLY enjoying a large population growth of several decades.
Low summer sea ice levels has little impact on Polar Bear dietary habits.
You are so clueless.
I never stated or implied that "all scientists are fakes", that came from you, don't try putting words in my mouth again!
It is a FACT that warmists do indeed ignore prediction/projections climate models failures. I have posted the evidence in the forum many times now, that gets ignored too.
Can't answer the question what has changed in the last two centuries? I have no clue.
What has not changed though in the last 25 years is people's total lack of interest in doing anything about climate change. It's so off people's radar it's laughable. Evidently the climate scientists have yet to make their case!
Separate names with a comma.